Logically, it could have been a trigger. For a very sick, flawed mind, a court mistake could have drawn his attention to his ex.
If there was a court date listed there, he should have gotten a notification regarding the court date in a certain way, right?
The lawyers in LV could not find him because he listed his work number in Nevada. But the court in Ohio could have had his personal phone number and some private Gmail account from older times. These things seldom change.
My question is, if MDM got the notification (it is not impossible to assume that he did), was there any further letter sent from Ohio court explaining their mistake? Or did they just cancel the court without any explanation?
Quite honestly, I think that MDM’s hiding from the lawsuit in Nevada was already indicative of extreme suspiciousness. Looking at the nature of malpractice suit, it makes no sense to get undercover. So just to imagine: MDM, for reasons unknown, was quietly getting “irrational”, as evidenced by hiding from the lawsuit in Nevada. Then he gets a notification, from yet another state, inviting him to a court regarding issues pertaining his old divorce. Then he gets yet another notification canceling the court, without any explanation… A different person would have been able to sort things out, but MDM might be already living in “somewhat altered reality.” So he jumps to certain conclusions without contacting anyone, and his perception of the situation is flawed.
I believe that we can’t blame a court clerk for a typo. “Clerical error” plus obsolete interface. It happens. Up to this point, I understand it all.
But humans don’t like to acknowledge mistakes, so if no letter explaining the mistake was sent to MDM, this is what I view as a wrong way of “damage control”, on behalf of Ohio court.
Courts are overwhelmed. And, they don’t know whom they might be dealing with. People can be sick, paranoid, struggling from Covid brains, totally falling apart, or in hiding from other lawyers. And then, one mistake can be a trigger prompting a person to unleash his emotions on the other person whose name is on that erroneously issued paper.
I may be wrong, of course, but the timing is close. So if it started as a “bureaucratic issue”, too sad.
Perhaps the courts should make templates of letters with apology to be sent in such cases? I know that they are overwhelmed, and that’s all that’s to it.