From the timeline above.....
Hanlin says (In my own words) that she is 100% certain her son was not present when the "activities" occurred....
I guess she had not seen the photo of her son carrying the girl?
Hmmmmmm?
Hmmm, I'll have to give it a think about how a piece of evidence which was discussed at length in open court is sweeping it under the rug. Of course, that was after it was described fairly accurately in the 9/2/12 Plain Dealer article.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...lits-town-between-big-red-and-guy-fawkes.html
...He added that the picture that seems to show M<modsnip> and his client carrying the girl from one room to the next as she’s seemingly unconscious is not what it seems.
“Out of context, it’s outrageous,” Madison said. “In context, maybe the shutter flashed when her eyes were blinking. I can tell you she was not unconscious.”...
I've only just started reading about this case in the last day and I am horrified that kids, verging on adults, can behave in this way. And I am sickened at the lack of charges against more of these 'men'. Just watched the video and that guy is an a class freak. I hope he is ostracised for a long time and works hard to earn a valued placed in society again. If only someone that night had the foresight and courage to call the police during the rapes.
If she was not unconscious then WHY was she being carried from party to party
by her wrists and ankles? What conscious girl allows herself to be carried like a corpse from place to place like that?
The young men who are carrying the girl are the two who are being charged.
http://websleuths.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=8721804
From what I've seen, the coverage of this case in local media has been terrible. Judging from the comments on recent articles, many local people feel that way too.
In case it's not obvious by this point, people feel the evidence is being swept under the rug because despite the photos, videos, tweets and witnesses to this crime, it appears that only two people are facing minimal charges.
Anyone else notice how quiet the Sheriff has been lately? Phew-this case doesnt need any more distractions. JMVHO.
It's part of the court record, testified under oath by lead detective in October 2012. Derndit again!
Ironic to your point, IMO, is that the reporter is crediting Goddard in this article for much of the information and for it being saved & archived...one of those durn biased social media types who didn't sweep it under the rug.Hmmm, I'll have to give it a think about how a piece of evidence which was discussed at length in open court is sweeping it under the rug. Of course, that was after it was described fairly accurately in the 9/2/12 Plain Dealer article.
Thank you for the clarification....
I am going into lurk mode....
Obviously the twists and turns in this case have gone over my head...
:blushing:
I noticed the girl too walking in with a boy near the end of the video. She stood out to me because I'm having a problem with a girl who would be around this pack talking and joking about the rape of this girl. WTH hasn't she been identified and why the heck didn't she come forward. Maybe she is the girl who helped the ex-boyfriend dupe this girl into going to the party.
I noticed the girl too walking in with a boy near the end of the video. She stood out to me because I'm having a problem with a girl who would be around this pack talking and joking about the rape of this girl. WTH hasn't she been identified and why the heck didn't she come forward. Maybe she is the girl who helped the ex-boyfriend dupe this girl into going to the party.
http://www.morningjournalnews.com/p...5434/Spaite-keeping-his-whistle.html?nav=5006
Spaite keeping his whistle
January 14, 2013
By KATIE SCHWENDEMAN - Staff Writer ([email protected]) , Morning Journal News
Save | Post a comment |
COLUMBIANA - Bob Spaite believes it is time to step down from two positions he has held in the city school district the last several years.
The board of education accepted Spaite's retirement resignation last week and on June 1 he will no longer be teaching social studies or serve as athletic director. He will remain on as head football coach, a position he had held 19 seasons.
Part of the record, yet for some reason the fact the video existed or that there were large number students who were either witnesses or had heard about the rape but didn't help or report it, wasn't considered of enough public interest to be published. From reading local press in the early days, it was simply a rape by two football players at a party. Meanwhile, the narrator of the video is on scholarship, probably attending parties on campus and making new female acquaintances. For others involved, life in high school went on as usual... sports were participated in, the football team cheered and paraded, dances and parties attended, honors bestowed and scholarships applied for and awarded.
One of the school district's teachers and her little league coach husband take in one of the accused rapists, appearing on national media with his attorney, talking about what a nice young man he is. After taking him on a little vacation in California, approved by the judge. The coach threatens a reporter for the NYT while one of his assistants says the girl was only trying to cover up her night of partying. The school superintendent says he left decisions about discipline of involved students up to the coach. The State AG says there were no deals, later we find his office did issue letters of immunity. It takes Hanlin two weeks to remember she knows kids involved and the local sheriff, after making Barney Fife look like a PR whiz, decides decisive action by his department is possible - when directed toward social media reporting on the case. Distrust of Goddard or Anonymous are posted here repeatedly - the poster will only trust local media - but is relieved that a pig like Stranahan shows up on the scene. I don't know what "Derndit" means so think I'll stick with "Oy Vey!"