OK OK - Jamison Family; Truck, IDs, money, & dog found abandoned, Oct 2009 - #5

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
Oh! So THAT explains why, when I called the guy up and started chewing him out for possibly passing prejudicial information about the Oklahoma Jamison family, that he kept saying, "But I'm in Durham, North Carolina! But I'm in Durham, North Carolina!"

LOL. My fault too. 918 is my own area code and I should have caught that.

Mea culpa wfgodot. One # off and my tired fingers didn't cooperate. Hopefully the # is now corrected.
Sorry to the poor guy who at least tried to explain. Hey, on the plus side, maybe now he's looking up the Jamison's! (Or else, ya know. Filing a harrassment suit against you.)
 
  • #182
Mea culpa wfgodot. One # off and my tired fingers didn't cooperate. Hopefully the # is now corrected.
Sorry to the poor guy who at least tried to explain. Hey, on the plus side, maybe now he's looking up the Jamison's! (Or else, ya know. Filing a harrassment suit against you.)

Drat. Now I wish I'd called that number.
 
  • #183
Good morning WS'ers! What, you all go to sleep when I go to work?? Shame on you! The Jamison's need to be found!

Perhaps this will perk todays interest. You know how upthread I mentioned that Sherilyn and Madyson were listed on the original victim report, but not Bobby?

Bobby is listed under the Uniform Incident/Offense report (a separate report) as 'Not cleared Exceptionally'

The additional categories listed under Cleared Exceptionally are:
-Death of Offender
-Prosecution Declined
-Extradition Declined
-Victim Refused to Cooperate
-Juvenile/No custody
and.....
-Not Cleared Exceptional

Are ya'll getting the picture that something was amiss in the reporting of this initial MP report? Why was Bobby recorded....umm...differently than the rest of his missing family?

Sleuth away, my friends. I am off to make breakfast because I have not slept in oh, approximately 396 hours, and the breakfast of champions is calling my name.
 
  • #184
Now...what? I've done the classic "takes off his glasses and rubs his eyes real hard, then puts them back on and reads the material again" take. Twice. Um, clerical error? Probably by a former student of mine, they were prone to all sorts of shenanigans. Who filled out this report, Officer Nutley?

What doth it portend?
 
  • #185
Good morning WS'ers! What, you all go to sleep when I go to work?? Shame on you! The Jamison's need to be found!

Perhaps this will perk todays interest. You know how upthread I mentioned that Sherilyn and Madyson were listed on the original victim report, but not Bobby?

Bobby is listed under the Uniform Incident/Offense report (a separate report) as 'Not cleared Exceptionally'

The additional categories listed under Cleared Exceptionally are:
-Death of Offender
-Prosecution Declined
-Extradition Declined
-Victim Refused to Cooperate
-Juvenile/No custody
and.....
-Not Cleared Exceptional

Are ya'll getting the picture that something was amiss in the reporting of this initial MP report? Why was Bobby recorded....umm...differently than the rest of his missing family?

Sleuth away, my friends. I am off to make breakfast because I have not slept in oh, approximately 396 hours, and the breakfast of champions is calling my name.

Could you scan a copy of the report or a photo of the report?
I would assume that they suspected he did something with his family an hence him not being listed but in that case a BOLO or warrent should have been issued.

In Addition here is a link explaining cleared and not cleared and exception.
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/offenses/clearances/index.html

It seems to imply Bobby may be facing charges of some sort that his mssing status has not cleared. IMO from reading the link I posted
 
  • #186
Now Im really confused!!!! I'm going back to bed!
 
  • #187
Could you scan a copy of the report or a photo of the report?
I would assume that they suspected he did something with his family an hence him not being listed but in that case a BOLO or warrent should have been issued.

In Addition here is a link explaining cleared and not cleared and exception.
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/offenses/clearances/index.html

It seems to imply Bobby may be facing charges of some sort that his mssing status has not cleared. IMO from reading the link I posted

Soul, I would love to scan it, however believe it or not I am sitting in my work vehicle actively working another case and the Jamison's are- sadly may I add- my downtime. Which is why you see me come and go so sporadically as of late. Long story short- I don't want to contaminate the command centers scanner with a different case than their own, kwim? I will do so when I get home and begin to breathe again.

In the meantime....I truly do not know what to make of this. Have I checked for outstanding warrants and forgotten about it?

ETA: I know you have to take my word for it (and therfore, I guess...rumor?) But I typed it exactly as written.
 
  • #188
This sort of document muddling is probably typical of obfuscating the trail when people go into witness protection. Like, maybe.
 
  • #189
  • #190
This sort of document muddling is probably typical of obfuscating the trail when people go into witness protection. Like, maybe.

Actually I happen to know quite a lot about WITSEC. (Don't ask.)
Bobby, I highly doubt, qualifies. But then again....I still don't know why the chips aren't in evidence, so what do I know??

wfgodot, perhaps you can help me with a few other minor details regarding the area.
Where is "Southside"? Is this the same as "Stigler"?
Where is "Cravens"?
Where is "Brooken"?
Where is "Lona Valley"?

And last but not least, being, I believe an educator yourself...in your professional opionion, can ANYONE in Oklahoma spell in the English language? Or is there some Okie language of which I am unfamiliar?

(No offense to locals. I love you guys. But these reports are heinous.)
 
  • #191
Soul, I would love to scan it, however believe it or not I am sitting in my work vehicle actively working another case and the Jamison's are- sadly may I add- my downtime. Which is why you see me come and go so sporadically as of late. Long story short- I don't want to contaminate the command centers scanner with a different case than their own, kwim? I will do so when I get home and begin to breathe again.

In the meantime....I truly do not know what to make of this. Have I checked for outstanding warrants and forgotten about it?

ETA: I know you have to take my word for it (and therfore, I guess...rumor?) But I typed it exactly as written.

I would not say it would be an outstanding warrent just yet. It may be charges not yet filed . An incomplete investigation? I will say if we were to reveiw the case and take into account the

1. They believe people are following them.
2. They have video camras set up arround there house.

It may have been a police investigation that caused them to behave this way and also why the ATF could be looking at the case.
I have no clue but it does open up a very different veiw than I had before.
 
  • #192
I would not say it would be an outstanding warrent just yet. It may be charges not yet filed . An incomplete investigation? I will say if we were to reveiw the case and take into account the

1. They believe people are following them.
2. They have video camras set up arround there house.

It may have been a police investigation that caused them to behave this way and also why the ATF could be looking at the case.
I have no clue but it does open up a very different veiw than I had before.

Soul, I agree. Which is why I cannot figure out wht is going on here. This is from the initial intake. Who was providing LE with this information? If they already had an active investigation going (barring the whole business with Bobby SR....) then what was it? I'm not finding that. And everything they allegedy seized was seized after the 23rd. (I think- I need to double check that.) The 8th was just the MP and the Offense report. It makes no sense to me.
 
  • #193
Actually I happen to know quite a lot about WITSEC. (Don't ask.)
Bobby, I highly doubt, qualifies. But then again....I still don't know why the chips aren't in evidence, so what do I know??

wfgodot, perhaps you can help me with a few other minor details regarding the area.
Where is "Southside"? Is this the same as "Stigler"?
Where is "Cravens"?
Where is "Brooken"?
Where is "Lona Valley"?

And last but not least, being, I believe an educator yourself...in your professional opionion, can ANYONE in Oklahoma spell in the English language? Or is there some Okie language of which I am unfamiliar?

(No offense to locals. I love you guys. But these reports are heinous.)

Brooken and Craven, are roads near Stigler.
 
  • #194
Actually I happen to know quite a lot about WITSEC. (Don't ask.)
Bobby, I highly doubt, qualifies. But then again....I still don't know why the chips aren't in evidence, so what do I know??

wfgodot, perhaps you can help me with a few other minor details regarding the area.
Where is "Southside"? Is this the same as "Stigler"?
Where is "Cravens"?
Where is "Brooken"?
Where is "Lona Valley"?

And last but not least, being, I believe an educator yourself...in your professsional opionion, can ANYONE in Oklahoma spell in the English language? Or is there some Okie language of which I am unfamiliar?

(No offense to locals. I love you guys. But these reports are heinous.)

No, they're not given to be spellers here, necessarily. Oral culture, stories related over campfires, that's an Okie's heritage.

Where is "Southside"? Is this the same as "Stigler"?
Answer: "Probably." There's a Southside Fire Department in Stigler, and I also see (not by having a vision but by googling) that there's a San Bois Baptist Association Southside Baptist Church in Stigler.

Where is "Cravens"?
Cravens is a township not far southeast of Wilburton.

http://www.satelliteviews.net/cgi-bin/g.cgi?fid=1824662&state=OK&ftype=civil

Where is "Brooken"?
Brooken is a township - and a mountain - 13.6 miles east-southeast of Eufaula

http://www.satelliteviews.net/cgi-bin/g.cgi?fid=1824653&state=OK&ftype=civil

Where is "Lona Valley"?
Lona Valley is in Episode Six, second season, of "Twilight Zone." - wait, just teasing. Lona Valley Cemetery is about 30 miles southeast of Eufaula and the name Lona Valley itself is associated with Kinta OK.

http://maps.google.com/maps?rlz=1T4...code_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBoQ8gEwAA
 
  • #195
No, they're not given to be spellers here, necessarily. Oral culture, stories related over campfires, that's an Okie's heritage.


Answer: "Probably." There's a Southside Fire Department in Stigler, and I also see (not by having a vision but by googling) that there's a San Bois Baptist Association Southside Baptist Church in Stigler.


Cravens is a township not far southeast of Wilburton.

http://www.satelliteviews.net/cgi-bin/g.cgi?fid=1824662&state=OK&ftype=civil


Brooken is a township - and a mountain - 13.6 miles east-southeast of Eufaula

http://www.satelliteviews.net/cgi-bin/g.cgi?fid=1824653&state=OK&ftype=civil


Lona Valley is in Episode Six, second season, of "Twilight Zone." - wait, just teasing. Lona Valley Cemetery is about 30 miles southeast of Eufaula and the name Lona Valley itself is associated with Kinta OK.

http://maps.google.com/maps?rlz=1T4...code_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBoQ8gEwAA

Mucho thanks for just saving me a boatload of work, my friends.
 
  • #196
Soul, I agree. Which is why I cannot figure out wht is going on here. This is from the initial intake. Who was providing LE with this information? If they already had an active investigation going (barring the whole business with Bobby SR....) then what was it? I'm not finding that. And everything they allegedy seized was seized after the 23rd. (I think- I need to double check that.) The 8th was just the MP and the Offense report. It makes no sense to me.

So when did each agency become involved.

Was there information in a computer that would "flag" information?
To keep other agencies from impeding an on going investigation? Did the LE making the report just give what he could give out about Bobby but have his hands tied on a missing person report because of whatever was in a computer.

Is any of that even possible because I have no background in LE. My uncle was higher up in LE but he just always ruined my fun.:crazy:

I am confused now to. This does seem to imply there was alot more going on before they were reported missing. Or at least something going on. Also explains why niki is the only one really concerned with finding the Jamisons.
 
  • #197
  • #198
So when did each agency become involved.

Was there information in a computer that would "flag" information?
To keep other agencies from impeding an on going investigation? Did the LE making the report just give what he could give out about Bobby but have his hands tied on a missing person report because of whatever was in a computer.

Is any of that even possible ,because I have no background in LE. My uncle was higher up in LE but he just always ruined my fun.:crazy:

I am confused now to. This does seem to imply there was alot more going on before they were reported missing. Or at least something going on. Also explains why niki is the only one really concerned with finding the Jamisons.

If I go through and spreadsheet, I believe I can come up with dates when each agency 'became involved." Wow, that'll be fun! But I can do it.
Seems to me (JMO, of course) that there was an active investigation preceding the disappearence of the Jamisons and unrelated to the issue of Bobby Sr and possible even any inheritance that Madyson might receive.

JMO, of course. But there is waaaayyyyyy too much info here, and waaaayyyyy too many agencies involved to be a simple MP case.
 
  • #199
And lots of $$$$ being tossed around!!!
 
  • #200
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
3,495
Total visitors
3,636

Forum statistics

Threads
632,669
Messages
18,630,059
Members
243,243
Latest member
MoriMoriChan
Back
Top