I'm confused about everyone continuously claiming he hid the gun and the car. The gun was turned over to police the day after the shooting by Kepler's attorney. They literally handed the smoking gun over to the cops. If they wanted to hide it or destroy it, they could have.
Same thing with the car. It was parked somewhere in a parking lot accessible to the public. Just because cops didn't know where and SK wouldn't tell them doesn't mean it was hidden. He has a constitutional right to remain silent and I'm sure his attorney told him not to answer any questions. Using the word "hidden" suggests that it was their intent at the time to put it some place it wouldn't be found. Again, if they'd wanted to hide the car, they could have. All they would have had to do is park it in someone's garage and close the door. Or take the license plate off. Or drive it somewhere obscure out of town. Or drive it into a lake. Leaving it in a parking lot in Tulsa city limits is hardly "hiding" it. Why was it there? I don't know. It was at a hotel, right? Maybe that's where SK met up with his lawyer to talk about everything before the lawyer drove him to the jail to turn himself in.
Why did he turn himself in? Because the alternative was to be arrested by the police in public or to try to run and hide from them. You're accusing him of hiding evidence (which is a false description of what actually happened) and criticizing him for NOT hiding from the cops.
Discrediting someone as a reliable witness just because they have mental health issues is wrong. But on the other hand, some mental health issues can potentially make someone a legitimately unreliable witness. It depends on the issues and the context, and we don't have enough information at this time to know which it is.
And I don't think they are claiming his defense is that the witness has mental health and/or credibility issues. I think they are claiming that he has a defense, and also that the witness has credibility issues.
Same thing with the car. It was parked somewhere in a parking lot accessible to the public. Just because cops didn't know where and SK wouldn't tell them doesn't mean it was hidden. He has a constitutional right to remain silent and I'm sure his attorney told him not to answer any questions. Using the word "hidden" suggests that it was their intent at the time to put it some place it wouldn't be found. Again, if they'd wanted to hide the car, they could have. All they would have had to do is park it in someone's garage and close the door. Or take the license plate off. Or drive it somewhere obscure out of town. Or drive it into a lake. Leaving it in a parking lot in Tulsa city limits is hardly "hiding" it. Why was it there? I don't know. It was at a hotel, right? Maybe that's where SK met up with his lawyer to talk about everything before the lawyer drove him to the jail to turn himself in.
Why did he turn himself in? Because the alternative was to be arrested by the police in public or to try to run and hide from them. You're accusing him of hiding evidence (which is a false description of what actually happened) and criticizing him for NOT hiding from the cops.
Discrediting someone as a reliable witness just because they have mental health issues is wrong. But on the other hand, some mental health issues can potentially make someone a legitimately unreliable witness. It depends on the issues and the context, and we don't have enough information at this time to know which it is.
And I don't think they are claiming his defense is that the witness has mental health and/or credibility issues. I think they are claiming that he has a defense, and also that the witness has credibility issues.