bluesneakers
not today satan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2014
- Messages
- 19,144
- Reaction score
- 120,069
A very clear reason for the correct identity to be released is because the wrongly ID'd man has a family.
And neighbors and friends and co-workers and enemies...
A very clear reason for the correct identity to be released is because the wrongly ID'd man has a family.
I disagree. This guy is dead. Whatever notoriety he hoped to gain is pointless to him now. Maybe it's our sick obsession with fame and fortune - at any cost - that is skewing people's perception of reality.
Yes, this is how I'm thinking too. I want to know everything and I want us to be free to find and learn whatever we can, but I don't like how killers can be turned into anti-heroes and become household names. Is there a line? I think it's possible to be curious and want more knowledge without creating the over-the-top characters we end up with. But I'm not sure how we go about it.
I have to disagree about the Europe comment.Western europeans are much more open and educational about sex than the US.They do not make a big deal about sex as being something negative.I am always suprised at what I see over there.
I disagree. This guy is dead. Whatever notoriety he hoped to gain is pointless to him now. Maybe it's our sick obsession with fame and fortune - at any cost - that is skewing people's perception of reality.
And did anyone stop you? Were those posts remove? No. So please don't allow anyone to confuse the issue for you. No one has taken the "sleuth" out of Websleuths.THANK YOU. I thought I just jumped the train to crazytown. I was about to back slowly out of this thread not making any sudden movements because I totally named him and posted links to some stuff I thought was very creepy.
A lot of these guys, though, are not mentally ill in the same way as those who need traditional mental health care. Mostly they're misanthropic, angry, loners - and for every one that goes on a shooting spree there are probably thousands who only ever dream about it. They can't be forced into mental health treatment, and they're very unlikely to accept treatment if it's offered since they see the problem in society, not themselves. I think more can be done from a prevention and early intervention angle, and addressing the causes, but I'm not so sure that is the same thing as fixing a failing mental health system. Other countries also have inadequate mental health care, and angry awkward young men, but it doesn't escalate into one mass shooting after another. For me, this is closer to the debate about young men becoming radicalised to violence (e.g. in Australia and the UK) than it is about mental health. There are definitely overlaps, but it's not the same thing.
![]()
"We are UCC" said at vigil
"We are family"
Candles raised one last time
![]()
http://archive.kgw.com/legacy/iframes/breaking-video.html
I disagree. This guy is dead. Whatever notoriety he hoped to gain is pointless to him now. Maybe it's our sick obsession with fame and fortune - at any cost - that is skewing people's perception of reality.
IT’S A MATTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY
http://nonotoriety.com/The quest for notoriety and infamy is a well known motivating factor in mass killings and violent copycat crimes. In an effort to reduce future tragedies, we CHALLENGE THE MEDIA – calling for RESPONSIBLE MEDIA COVERAGE FOR THE SAKE OF PUBLIC SAFETY when reporting on individuals who commit or attempt acts of rampage mass violence thereby depriving violent like minded individuals the media celebrity and media spotlight they so crave.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303309504579181702252120052Underlying this grim national ritual, and the pronouncements from all quarters that mass shootings are "senseless," is the disturbing feeling that these acts are beyond our understanding.
So we focus our efforts on thwarting future mass shooters—catching them through the mental health system, or making it harder for them to get guns, or making it easier for others with guns to stop them.
But the criminologists and psychologists who study mass killings aren't so baffled.
He notes that rampage shootings tend to follow a definite pattern, what he called a "program for murder and suicide." The shooter, almost always a young man, enters an area filled with many people. He is heavily armed. He may begin by targeting a few specific victims, but he soon moves on to "indiscriminate killings where just killing people is the prime aim." He typically has no plan for escape and kills himself or is killed by police. Among the more pervasive myths about massacre killers is that they simply snap. In fact, Dr. Mullen and others have found that rampage shooters usually plan their actions meticulously, even ritualistically, for months in advance. Like serial killers, massacre killers usually don't have impulsive personalities; they tend to be obsessive and highly organized. Survivors typically report that the shooters appear to be not enraged but cold and calculating.
Instead, massacre killers are typically marked by what are considered personality disorders: grandiosity, resentment, self-righteousness, a sense of entitlement. They become, says Dr. Knoll, " 'collectors of injustice' who nurture their wounded narcissism." To preserve their egos, they exaggerate past humiliations and externalize their anger, blaming others for their frustrations. They develop violent fantasies of heroic revenge against an uncaring world.
What these findings suggest is that mass shootings are a kind of theater. Their purpose is essentially terrorism—minus, in most cases, a political agenda.
How might journalists and police change their practices to discourage mass shootings? First, they need to do more to deprive the killer of an audience:
Never publish a shooter's propaganda. Aside from the act itself, there is no greater aim for the mass killer than to see his own grievances broadcast far and wide. Many shooters directly cite the words of prior killers as inspiration. In 2007, the forensic psychiatrist Michael Welner told "Good Morning America" that the Virginia Tech shooter's self-photos and videotaped ramblings were a "PR tape" that was a "social catastrophe" for NBC News to have aired.
Hide their names and faces. With the possible exception of an at-large shooter, concealing their identities will remove much of the motivation for infamy.
http://peterdaou.com/2015/06/time-for-the-media-to-censor-the-names-of-fame-seeking-mass-killers/This is the age of fame for fame’s sake, the strange loop of becoming famous for becoming famous, where Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube create instant celebrities whose only achievement is becoming an Internet celebrity.
An entire generation is growing up craving shortcuts to the public spotlight, hoping for that one offbeat “viral” video that can catapult them from obscurity to national recognition.
The desire for fame is the need to prove we existed, to cheat the eternity of death, to show we mattered, to leave a mark in the minds of others in the hope that they will remember us. It is the deepest of all needs, the existential urge to mean something, to be somebody.
For a small segment of individuals, who are either evil, barbarically murderous, mentally ill, easily manipulable by the language of hate, or some combination thereof, a mass killing is the surest and quickest path to “being somebody.” It is no coincidence that of the 12 deadliest shootings in the United States, six have happened from 2007 onward. The advent of social media and the rise of instant celebrities creates the unrealistic belief that fame requires no training, no hard work, no accomplishment. Anyone can be famous for any reason – or for no reason at all.
http://www.claytoncramer.com/scholarly/JMME2.htmABSTRACT: Analyzes news coverage of mass murders in Time and Newsweek for the period 1984-91 for evidence of disproportionate, perhaps politically motivated coverage of certain categories of mass murder. Discusses ethical problems related to news and entertainment attention to mass murder, and suggests methods of enhancing the public's understanding of the nature of murder.[1]How important was the news coverage of Purdy's crime in influencing Wesbecker's actions, above and beyond identifying the weapon of choice for such an act of savagery? Police now believe Wesbecker had begun plotting the suicide rampage for at least seven months. Searching Wesbecker's house, police found a copy of a Feb. 6 Time magazine detailing mass murders in California, Oklahoma, Texas and elsewhere.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/stop-giving-murderers-publicity-kill-article-1.272193Do we actually need to know or learn much more about "the mind of a killer" or what happened in his early life?
I think not. I agree with the relative of one of the people killed in the Columbine shootings who said that too much attention is given to the killers and not enough to the people who are killed.
The Virginia Tech loon who sent photographs and videotapes of himself to NBC clearly planned to blast his way into fame. He wanted to be remembered and thought all of this out before cutting himself down at the end of his meaningless hill of murders. Actually, for him, the killings had a big meaning: making a very sick man part of the celebrity culture in which we find ourselves trapped. If you don't have talent, well, you can kill. That will bring the cameras and the discussion.
Last week, a gunman killed eight people before committing suicide in an Omaha shopping mall. "Now I will be famous," the killer wrote in a suicide note, his landlady told CNN.
Oh yes, regarding sex they are much more liberal! It is graphic violence that they restrict much more than we do here. Kids do not have access to that crap like they do here.
Was not speaking to their views about sex at all.
Well there would be no sleuthing without knowing an identity.
We don't need to splash the name and face all over every 5 minutes but I do believe we need to know the name.
And that's the truth, Ruth! :loveyou:No one has taken the "sleuth" out of Websleuths.![]()
Sex equates to power, and perhaps the shooter was rejected? Isolation and rejection are very well hidden in some people, and could have been bullied. How old is he? 20?
I have to disagree about the Europe comment.Western europeans are much more open and educational about sex than the US.They do not make a big deal about sex as being something negative.I am always suprised at what I see over there.
Yes, this is how I'm thinking too. I want to know everything and I want us to be free to find and learn whatever we can, but I don't like how killers can be turned into anti-heroes and become household names. Is there a line? I think it's possible to be curious and want more knowledge without creating the over-the-top characters we end up with. But I'm not sure how we go about it.