Oh I agree.If she was being harassed and he had multiple phones, she might not have known who he was, what his name was, or how he close he was.
JMO
Oh I agree.If she was being harassed and he had multiple phones, she might not have known who he was, what his name was, or how he close he was.
JMO
Also as a reference, if anyone is searching Keon’s priors: Oreland, Jenkintown, Abington, Elkins Park are all townships located just outside of the City of Philadelphia, to the north.
She did not show up to court so charges were dropped.I can’t find a record of the prior kidnapping /strangulation charges. I take this to mean that the charges were dropped prior to any court proceedings, such as arraignment. There would be no record if no court proceedings took place. This suggests, imo, that the alleged prior victim was unavailable to the ADA assigned to the case. Moo.
I feel your anger. Truly. But it’s almost impossible to prosecute a case when the alleged victim does not cooperate.It's difficult for me to reason why on earth this man was released just because the victim did not appear in court. WTH? Now look where we are.
I feel your anger. Truly. But it’s almost impossible to prosecute a case when the alleged victim does not cooperate.
An obvious move on the part of the defense would be to demand a jury trial. Well, what jury would convict without a witness?
Hence, the charges are dropped.
I don’t like it, but it happens all of the time.
Moo.
Spot on. Well said.And often happens because of the mental health spiral caused by the crime
Agree on sharing the info as widely as possible. A lot of people don't want to get involved but we owe a debt of gratitude to the alert citizen who called in to report the car. This may be the key piece of evidence to find Kada.The tips which came in after that press conference this morning helped LE find a potential crime scene and the car.
Proves IMO, why LE needs to share information with the public and enlist their help!! Millions of sets of eyes, vs. a handful - over the entire geographical region!!
My thoughts continue to be with Kada’s family.
So well said: do not blame yourself. You protected yourself. I wish we had a better option for you. Be well, and move forward.Awful reading the updates - unfortunately I do think shes not going to be found alive now.
My thoughts are with her family as they await news.
Can I also just give my thoughts to the lady who was strangled by this man earlier this year and decided against taking it through the courts (likely due to being absolutely terrified of him and possible repercussions)- I dread to think the guilt that shes likely feeling now - do not blame yourself.
I totally understand that but there should be a way that this criminal could be tried without the testimony of the victim. Now, he has most likely done the very same thing, except she is still missing.I feel your anger. Truly. But it’s almost impossible to prosecute a case when the alleged victim does not cooperate.
An obvious move on the part of the defense would be to demand a jury trial. Well, what jury would convict without a witness?
Hence, the charges are dropped.
I don’t like it, but it happens all of the time.
Moo.
JMO bc IANAL but i think it’s bc the accused has the constitutional right to confront their accuser. According to cornell law it is explicitly stated in the sixth amendment to the constitution.I feel your anger. Truly. But it’s almost impossible to prosecute a case when the alleged victim does not cooperate.
An obvious move on the part of the defense would be to demand a jury trial. Well, what jury would convict without a witness?
Hence, the charges are dropped.
I don’t like it, but it happens all of the time.
Moo.
Honestly, I don’t know how. The real fix to stuff like this is a better funded victim’s services and advocates network to support survivors in feeling safe enough and stable enough to testify.I totally understand that but there should be a way that this criminal could be tried without the testimony of the victim. Now, he has most likely done the very same thing, except she is still missing.
I totally agree, but I wonder if they thought the jury wouldn't convict without the victim testifying.I totally understand that but there should be a way that this criminal could be tried without the testimony of the victim. Now, he has most likely done the very same thing, except she is still missing.
I really hope that now that the suspect is in custody and LE is going to open again the earlier case, I hope that the victim feels like she can now testify.Awful reading the updates - unfortunately I do think shes not going to be found alive now.
My thoughts are with her family as they await news.
Can I also just give my thoughts to the lady who was strangled by this man earlier this year and decided against taking it through the courts (likely due to being absolutely terrified of him and possible repercussions)- I dread to think the guilt that shes likely feeling now - do not blame yourself.
I truly understand this, I'm just very frustrated that there isn't a way around this. If Kada is deceased, he will still be tried. Now that he is locked up maybe the other victim will be willing to testify.JMO bc IANAL but i think it’s bc the accused has the constitutional right to confront their accuser. According to cornell law it is explicitly stated in the sixth amendment to the constitution.
The Accuser in such a case is the Commonwealth of PA. Therefore, the Commonwealth could theoretically move forward with a case, even if the alleged victim was not available to testify. The problem is this: in a jury trial, the jury expects to hear from the alleged victim. If that victim does not appear, the jury can only speculate. If a trial moves forward without an alleged victim, they can assume anything they want. It’s exceptionally easy for the defense to put forth a case that cannot be refuted by the prosecutor. Hence, most prosecutors would decline to move a case forward without a witness.JMO bc IANAL but i think it’s bc the accused has the constitutional right to confront their accuser. According to cornell law it is explicitly stated in the sixth amendment to the constitution.
Most likely. I'm guessing she was terrified to come forward. Now, she should feel better about it.I totally agree, but I wonder if they thought the jury wouldn't convict without the victim testifying.
jmopinion