Curiosity1234
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
- Messages
- 931
- Reaction score
- 4,960
JS needs to have a tooth pulled by the prison dentist. Load him up with truth serum and watch him sing like a bird in a cage. How fitting.
They can add additional charges at anytime. It doesn't have to be before, or at the preliminary hearing. The same holds true for the plea bargain. That can be offered at anytime up until the trial starts, and even after the trial ends before the jury deliberates.He might be holding out per advice from his lawyer to see if they are going to add more serious charges or more charges in general thereby positioning himself to exchange info for a better deal. We have to wait for court appearance on July 21st for that correct ? It seems so so far away.
Thank you Rocky1, for the info., obviously my legal knowledge is limited.They can add additional charges at anytime. It doesn't have to be before, or at the preliminary hearing. The same holds true for the plea bargain. That can be offered at anytime up until the trial starts, and even after the trial ends before the jury deliberates.
What will happen at the preliminary hearing, is, the evidence will be presented to a judge based on the current charges, and he/she will decide if there is probable cause to bring the case to trial, and if there is probable cause, the judge will bind over to a grand jury. If not, the case will be dismissed.
If he has retained an attorney, I find it odd that he'd be telling a guard "no body no conviction" The very first thing an attorney would be telling him would be to keep his mouth shut, period. Does anyone have the link for that statement? Thanks in advance.
What you say is true.Thank you Rocky1, for the info., obviously my legal knowledge is limited.
The plea deal. Can it come from either side DA or attorney ? Is it more common for the DA to broach the subject or the Attorney. TIA. ?What you say is true.
They may very well add additional charges before the preliminary hearing, but my point is, they don't have to at this time.
If they do, that may not be a smart move on the DA's part, unless they have enough evidence to support the additional charges. It would be smarter to wait and add them later when/if they gather more evidence.
There was another post above asking why JS just doesn't talk and tell LE where the body is.
If he does know, (he's still presumed innocent) That would be a bargaining chip in his favor if/when a plea deal is reached. So for example, he'll tell them where the body is for a reduced sentence. By talking, that would seal his fate, as far as a murder charge goes.
95 % of criminal cases are resolved through a plea bargain.
What you say is true.
They may very well add additional charges before the preliminary hearing, but my point is, they don't have to at this time.
If they do, that may not be a smart move on the DA's part, unless they have enough evidence to support the additional charges. It would be smarter to wait and add them later when/if they gather more evidence.
There was another post above asking why JS just doesn't talk and tell LE where the body is.
If he does know, (he's still presumed innocent) That would be a bargaining chip in his favor if/when a plea deal is reached. So for example, he'll tell them where the body is for a reduced sentence. By talking, that would seal his fate, as far as a murder charge goes.
95 % of criminal cases are resolved through a plea bargain.
The DA will offer the deal. He/she does not have to offer, and the defendant does not have to accept.The plea deal. Can it come from either side DA or attorney ? Is it more common for the DA to broach the subject or the Attorney. TIA. ?
My strongest suspicion is a landfill that does not do recycling. Those routes that just collect trash and go straight to a landfill are most likely. It think those type routes and landfills are most common in rural areas. Does anyone have more specific information on trash routes or any knowledge of which trash company picks up in the area where Linda lived and was abducted?What you say is true.
They may very well add additional charges before the preliminary hearing, but my point is, they don't have to at this time.
If they do, that may not be a smart move on the DA's part, unless they have enough evidence to support the additional charges. It would be smarter to wait and add them later when/if they gather more evidence.
There was another post above asking why JS just doesn't talk and tell LE where the body is.
If he does know, (he's still presumed innocent) That would be a bargaining chip in his favor if/when a plea deal is reached. So for example, he'll tell them where the body is for a reduced sentence. By talking, that would seal his fate, as far as a murder charge goes.
95 % of criminal cases are resolved through a plea bargain.
The plea deal. Can it come from either side DA or attorney ? Is it more common for the DA to broach the subject or the Attorney. TIA. ?
Our sixth amendment provides the defendant the right to a speedy trial, for the very reason you stated.... so the prosecution can't drag their feet.I agree, additional charges are coming imo. Imo it's just a matter of time.
There simply is no need to do so at this time.
This case is similar to most other missing person murder cases.
What many DAs are doing now is bringing other charges first. As you know kidnapping is a very serious felony within itself. Imo, JS will remain remanded to jail on the offenses against him now.
This gives the investigators ample time to gather the evidence they will need for first degree murder charges to be added at some point in time. There is no need to rush.
I'm not sure the DA will consider a plea even if offered by the defendant/attorney.
I've seen several prosecutors who refused to plea in missing body cases even if the suspect said they would give up the body location.
When the trials were held without ever locating the bodies the cases were filled with an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence proving the cases BARD.
I firmly believe with or without Linda's body he will be charged with first degree murder. CE is very powerful evidence, and much more reliable than eyewitness direct evidence testimony because DE has been shown to be inaccurate. That is why the DAs have been highly successful in conviction rates by entering CE concerning these very kind of missing body murder cases.
Jmho
'Hopefully, justice will be served, and they find Linda'Fox43.com has an interview with Rueben King owner of King's Paint and Wallpaper next to Harvest Structures. SJ called someone from his cell phone while at Harvest Structures. I found interview under Hopefully justice will be served, Linda will be found. I can't link it.
Our sixth amendment provides the defendant the right to a speedy trial, for the very reason you stated.... so the prosecution can't drag their feet.
Although it becomes a game of both sides stalling as much as possible (so the prosecution can gather evidence, and the defense will hope that people forget) Judges frown on a case dragging on.
"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied".
The defendant will not be offering a plea deal. The DA may. Plea deals are offered because of two reasons. The DA may think he/she may not have enough evidence to win, and bluffs, The second reason is due to courts being backed up, along with heavy case loads pending in the DA's office. (and I am sure they will be even more after this Covid virus subsides)
I could see a defense attorney offering to charge bargain after a trial, if he thinks the defendant doesn't stand a chance of the jury returning a not guilty verdict.Yes, I was just thinking if JS will invoke his constitutional right to have a speedy trial.
Imo, I think he will waive his right to a speedy trial like most all do.
I don't believe a plea deal will be the case here. I dont see a plea happening.
The very few I've seen in four decade of following murder cases and trials it was the defense attorneys who came to the DA with an offer. Two, iirc were when the juries were deliberating. One, the defendant plead G down from murder 1 to murder 2. The other one agreed to murder one. It was DP trial.
One of the criminal cases I served on as a juror, we later learned the defense attorney/ defendant wanted to make a plea deal. It was a double homicide with the DP. The DA refused to plea so it went to trial.
I don't think this DA wil agree to a plea deal especially due to the circumstance surrounding it, and how vulnerable the victim was.
I do know most cases end in plea deals with both adversarial parties hashing it out.
Imo this is not going to be one of those cases.
Jmho
.
Interesting. Thanks
Interesting. Thanks