Identified! PA - Philadelphia, 'Boy in the Box', WhtMale 4-6, 4UMPA, Feb'57

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,541
  • #1,542
Okay, I will send them an email asking them to consider it, if they aren't already.
 
  • #1,543
Thank You so much.That would be awesome.Does Law Enforcement or the medical examiner have to request it?
Okay, I will send them an email asking them to consider it, if they aren't already.
 
  • #1,544
This case should be suggested to the DNA Doe Project, if it hasn't already.

DNA Doe Project has mentioned that they specifically have decided not to take on any child Doe cases because child Does are most often killed by family and that creates complications when it comes to their relationship with GEDmatch, the DNA database they use... too much potential upset basically as people who submitted their DNA to GEDmatch could have unwittingly implicated family members in a crime & could raise a huge stink about that. It's very sad but I guess they had to make that calculation.

This isn't relevant to Boy in the Box but I also know they are avoiding non-white cases (sadly) because there are so few non-white people that have uploaded to GEDmatch that it makes finding their identities such a huge long shot to the point that they can't justify spending the resources at this point in time. They are optimistic that will change in the upcoming years though.
 
  • #1,545
DNA Doe Project has mentioned that they specifically have decided not to take on any child Doe cases because child Does are most often killed by family and that creates complications when it comes to their relationship with GEDmatch, the DNA database they use... too much potential upset basically as people who submitted their DNA to GEDmatch could have unwittingly implicated family members in a crime & could raise a huge stink about that. It's very sad but I guess they had to make that calculation.

This isn't relevant to Boy in the Box but I also know they are avoiding non-white cases (sadly) because there are so few non-white people that have uploaded to GEDmatch that it makes finding their identities such a huge long shot to the point that they can't justify spending the resources at this point in time. They are optimistic that will change in the upcoming years though.

Totally agree with the reason why they may not take on children's cases, but, most likely, with this case, the perpetrators are most likely deceased, it's been 60 years. But, I get it.
 
  • #1,546
Totally agree with the reason why they may not take on children's cases, but, most likely, with this case, the perpetrators are most likely deceased, it's been 60 years. But, I get it.

I'm pretty sure they've decided to not take children's cases across the board because even if the perps have died in this case, their descendants are still around, you know? And it's a pretty gruesome family situation to be pulled into. I guess it doesn't hurt to ask them though! You might get a quicker response through their facebook
 
  • #1,547
That's sad.I personally think they should take this poor little boys case.Is there any other place that does this type of DNA testing and see if they can take The boy in the box's case? I hope and pray LE is really checking DNA with possible relatives to the boy in the box like the article said they were.
DNA Doe Project has mentioned that they specifically have decided not to take on any child Doe cases because child Does are most often killed by family and that creates complications when it comes to their relationship with GEDmatch, the DNA database they use... too much potential upset basically as people who submitted their DNA to GEDmatch could have unwittingly implicated family members in a crime & could raise a huge stink about that. It's very sad but I guess they had to make that calculation.

This isn't relevant to Boy in the Box but I also know they are avoiding non-white cases (sadly) because there are so few non-white people that have uploaded to GEDmatch that it makes finding their identities such a huge long shot to the point that they can't justify spending the resources at this point in time. They are optimistic that will change in the upcoming years though.
 
  • #1,548
I'm pretty sure they've decided to not take children's cases across the board because even if the perps have died in this case, their descendants are still around, you know? And it's a pretty gruesome family situation to be pulled into. I guess it doesn't hurt to ask them though! You might get a quicker response through their facebook

I'm fine with the email. If they choose not to take it, at least I tried.

I
 
  • #1,549
Thank You for trying.Maybe if they do not take his case we can all brain storm and find someone else that will take his case and do this type of DNA testing for him.I very strongly believe DNA will tell who he is.I believe it.
I'm fine with the email. If they choose not to take it, at least I tried.

I
 
  • #1,550
I agree, Ms. Suzanne, only I'm not sure of any other groups who may do this sort of thing. From what you stated, it sounds like investigators may already be going in that route, but these things can take years and years.
 
  • #1,551
Thank You.I tried to send this message to thier facebook page.I hope and pray other people will ask them too. Hi my name is Suzanne.May I please ask you if you can check a unidentified boy for DNA He was found February 25th 1957 in Philadelphia Pennsylvania.I care very much for this little boy and him getting his real name back.My heart really goes out to him.It has very sadly been way too long for him to not know who he is.Who ever is responsible for killing him has probably died a long time ago.This little boy deserved his real name a long time ago.Please help him. http://americasunknownchild.net/
This case should be suggested to the DNA Doe Project, if it hasn't already.
 
  • #1,552
Thanks, Suzanne.
 
  • #1,553
They did answer me back on facebook.They said Hi Suzanne, Thank you for suggesting this case. We will add it to our list for possible future consideration.

They seem very nice.They said they might consider him later.I pray they do.It is really so good for them to do this for other Jane and John does.It really might help find out who they are.DNA is so very powerful.
 
  • #1,554
That is hopeful!
 
  • #1,555
Tomorrow February 25 is the anniversary of when he was found.It makes me very sad he is still unidentified and without his real name.I pray he is Identified soon.
 
  • #1,556
I pray he is Identified soon.I care very much about him .Please keep him in your prayers and please do not forget about him.
 
  • #1,557
I hope and pray we hear of a update he has been Identified soon.It's been a very long time for this sweet little boy.
 
  • #1,558
If I may please put this here.I am very honored to put Jim Hoffmanns book here.He has helped this little boy so much.He is very sweet to do this for this sweet little boy.I just bought his new book.I am very honored to be obsessed with this sweet little boy also.I pray this litlle one is Identified very soon.I KNOW he will be one day. https://www.amazon.com/Boy-Box-Amer...preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch
 
  • #1,559
Here's what DNA Doe Project said on facebook when I asked them if they still weren't taking on child cases:

'you're correct. Due to the age of the Boy in the Box it is unlikely we'd be able to take his case. Too likely that family was involved since no one reported him as missing. There could certainly be scenarios where the family is innocent, but we can't take that chance. It's possible that Colleen could analyze the Y-DNA, but that would not be through DNA Doe Project.'

And they are going to see the Boy in the Box's agency at Rootstech this week, which I guess is a conference about these things
 
  • #1,560
May I please ask what this is and what this is about? And they are going to see the Boy in the Box's agency at Rootstech this week, which I guess is a conference about these things
Here's what DNA Doe Project said on facebook when I asked them if they still weren't taking on child cases:

'you're correct. Due to the age of the Boy in the Box it is unlikely we'd be able to take his case. Too likely that family was involved since no one reported him as missing. There could certainly be scenarios where the family is innocent, but we can't take that chance. It's possible that Colleen could analyze the Y-DNA, but that would not be through DNA Doe Project.'

And they are going to see the Boy in the Box's agency at Rootstech this week, which I guess is a conference about these things
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
2,427
Total visitors
2,528

Forum statistics

Threads
633,230
Messages
18,638,280
Members
243,453
Latest member
Herlock3267
Back
Top