BBMFF: So then why go to the extreme measure of tossing it in the river? RG didn't "clean" the computer, he utterly destroyed it. For 99.99% of the population, using cleaning software would be enough for them to be confident that their electronic data had been scrubbed. Also, wasn't this his work laptop, i.e., government property vs. his own private computer? I'm not clear on whether he just used this laptop for work purposes or if indeed it was county-issued and the property of the government, i.e., something he would need to turn back in to the county when he retired.
ITA w/ you that the laptop may be unrelated; however, I see the probability of it being unrelated as extremely low. Again, JMO. For that reason, illegal activity of some kind is definitely high on my list of what that laptop may have contained. The biggest stumbling block to evidence of illegal activity in my mind is that this was RG's work computer. He was clearly an intelligent man, it's hard to envision him deciding to conduct illicit activities on a piece of public property (if it was indeed property of the county).
For RG to "fry" his hard drive by driving miles away and toss the whole kit and caboodle into the river right in the same timeframe that he goes missing screams of it being a piece of the "Why and where did RG go?" puzzle.
It was an old laptop. Neither the case nor the HD were worth much at all because of age. He had been issued the laptop 3 or so years before. The loss of the thing would have necessitated paying just a small amount if the county sent him ( or his next of kin) a bill for it. It's becoming a red herring again.
Maybe the river drop was exactly what I said from my family members in IT. That if the HD was not found early on, the sandy water would corrode the parts.
Not to say " Foul play" but just as a reminder that he left his way and left things the way he wanted them.
He didn't throw in the laptop's carrying case. He left the case it usually stayed in where it usually was kept, in the top of his closet. Patty got the case down for LE, and we are led to believe that's when she and the policeman witnessed the computer being missing. He may have wanted to delay knowledge of it being missing.
He or someone unscrewed the HD from the case and pulled it out and separated it from the computer body, which was a deliberate act to goof up the HD.
He was meticulous. He wanted the computer gone and destroyed, so he took it to Lewisburg, as he was going there anyway, minus the storage/ carry case, and destroyed it.
It's not a huge piece of valuable evidence, and we determined why a long time ago. It was not a laptop which would have been re- issued to someone else when Ray turned it in upon his retirement 6 months later. It was old and considered to be obsolete.
Whatever was on the HD was HIS intellectual property. He had every right to obliterate it for his own reasons, and for all we know, may have left money somehow with a friend that would have paid the $200 or so for its market value. We aren't privy to much case information, but the fact is, he did a very minor wrong thing if he did destroy the old laptop with no compensation to the county.
If that's the worst thing he ever did, or any of us ever do in the same situation, we are practically saints.