Paint tote

[JMO8778]

There are plenty of inaccuracies on wiki,it's no different from that last tv special Patsy and JR did..the one where Moriarty (rolling eyes) stated that 'police had info that would have cleared the Ramsey's' ..oh please...she knows better...that old,degraded 'rogue' DNA that wasn't even placed there at the same time as JB's doesn't clear them at all.

 

[DeeDee249]

Wikipedia is written by anyone and everyone. Anyone can write whatever they want there, it isn't a bastion of truth.

 

[DeeDee249]

DeeDee rules:

Rule No. 1: Anyone who is not a US citizen is unable to use American slang.

Rule No. 2: Anyone who is not a US citizen is unaware of US slang.

Rule no. 2 1/2: 'southern common sense' is exclusively American.

Rule no. 3: Once one address is used in a ransom note, a true stranger would not change that address later in the note.

Rule no. 4: If the note uses really familiar terms, it could not have been written by a stranger.

Rule no. 5: True kidnappings are never accompanied by handwriting that is similar to one of the parents.

YES! That's absolutely right!
I have many more rules where than came from, too.

 

[coloradokares]

LE is non-prosecutorial when it comes to the R's. The Secret Service branch of the US government said PR didn't write the note. These conclusions are made by people with access to all the information, unlike you or me. This should tell you something.

The idea that LE has 'biz' with R lawyers, as suggested by SD, is ridiculous. It looks like LE just doesn't buy any of these RDI make-believe stories.

It was a brutal murder by a pedophile. Thats what the hard evidence says.

There's no brutal pedophile living at the R's.

Intead of repeating once again what you claim, that PR did not write the note, Prove it!

 

[coloradokares]

Intead of repeating once again what you claim, that PR did not write the note, Prove it!

Sorry I meant to add Prove it... Wikipedia is not proof. Prove your secret agent man was right and that was not just an opinion.

 

[Solace]

W-i-k-i-p-e-d-i-a

"no evidence to indicate that Patsy Ramsey executed any of the questioned material appearing on the Ransom Note."

--Richard Dusak, ABFDE, Secret Service

That the R's received special treatment is just a figment of your imagination.

Not so Holdon. It was a family murder and a staging by same later on to cover the murder - there is prior abuse also.

 

[JMO8778]

Not so Holdon. It was a family murder and a staging by same later on to cover the murder - there is prior abuse also.

absolutely,and IDI's want us to believe otherwise,when the evidence shows chronic infiltrate into the cells.

 

[JMO8778]

deleted-double post.

 

[DeeDee249]

A pedophile killer would not have re-dressed his victim. Would not have wiped his victim down, nor wrapped her in a blanket, and there would almost certainly have been much more damage in the vaginal area. And would have almost certainly have removed his victim from the home. Pedophile killers do not have much consideration for the victim after gratification, and never ask for ransom. The victim is discarded after the crime, usually buried somewhere or simply left exposed.
Kidnappers for ransom, on the other hand, would need the victim alive. They would never risk capture and/or prosecution for an inane sum like $118,000.
Neither would a kidnapper be likely to sexually abuse his victim, because IF the kidnapping goes as planned, and they collect ransom in exchange for the victim, they would not want anything that could be traced back to them (DNA).

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

A pedophile killer would not have re-dressed his victim. Would not have wiped his victim down, nor wrapped her in a blanket, and there would almost certainly have been much more damage in the vaginal area. And would have almost certainly have removed his victim from the home. Pedophile killers do not have much consideration for the victim after gratification, and never ask for ransom. The victim is discarded after the crime, usually buried somewhere or simply left exposed.
Kidnappers for ransom, on the other hand, would need the victim alive. They would never risk capture and/or prosecution for an inane sum like $118,000.
Neither would a kidnapper be likely to sexually abuse his victim, because IF the kidnapping goes as planned, and they collect ransom in exchange for the victim, they would not want anything that could be traced back to them (DNA).

You're right. A pedophile killer would not do these things. Neither would a ransom kidnapper.

So are these the only choices IDI is allowed? Pedophile killer and ransom kidnapper? What about pedophile kidnapper? Sadistic or ritualistic killer?

 

[DeeDee249]

You're right. A pedophile killer would not do these things. Neither would a ransom kidnapper.

So are these the only choices IDI is allowed? Pedophile killer and ransom kidnapper? What about pedophile kidnapper? Sadistic or ritualistic killer?

IDI may have as many choices as they wish.

Sadistic killer? Sure- but unlikely to ply his trade IN THE HOME with parents upstairs. Those killers like to take their time- keeping a victim alive for days or longer.
Pedophile kidnappers of course, exist, and we see it all too frequently in the news. They don't ask for ransom as that is not their motive. The sexual assault of the child is their goal. They usually will kill their victim, but again- they remove their victims from the home/or parent(s) to carry out the assault and murder away from the child's home and parents. (examples would be Polly Klaas-taken from her home; Samantha Runion- from her front yard; Adam Walsh- from a store where he was with his parent; Megan Kanka- from her neighborhood) Neither of these types of killers would be likely to kidnap a child TO HER OWN BASEMENT and/or assault and kill her there as well.


RDI have only one choice - an R did it.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Sadistic killer? Sure- but unlikely to ply his trade IN THE HOME with parents upstairs. Those killers like to take their time- keeping a victim alive for days or longer.
Pedophile kidnappers exist. They don't ask for ransom as that is not their motive. The sexual assault of the child is their goal. They usually will kill their victim, but again- they remove their victims from the home/or parents. (examples would be Polly Klaas- from her home, Samantha Runion- from her front yard, Adam Walsh- from a store where he was with his parent.) Neither of these types of killers would be likely to kidnap a chikd TO HER OWN BASEMENT and/or assault and kill her there as well.
IDI may have as many choices as they wish.

RDI have only one- an R did it.

Yeah, but redressing and wrapping in a blanket seems like prep for removing JBR from the house. RDI's 'lovingly wrapping like papoose' is just explaining away this phenomenon, IMO.

 

[DeeDee249]

Yeah, but redressing and wrapping in a blanket seems like prep for removing JBR from the house. RDI's 'lovingly wrapping like papoose' is just explaining away this phenomenon, IMO.

Sure- IF SHE WAS ALIVE. The killers you mentioned would not bother to remove a corpse.
Keep in mind, LE never saw JBR's body in situ in the wineceller. JR brought her up from the basement unwrapped, leaving the blanket(s) and tape in the wineceller.

 

[Ames]

W-i-k-i-p-e-d-i-a

"no evidence to indicate that Patsy Ramsey executed any of the questioned material appearing on the Ransom Note."

--Richard Dusak, ABFDE, Secret Service

That the R's received special treatment is just a figment of your imagination.

You do know that anybody can get onto Wikipedia and change whatever they want to, don't you?

 

[Ames]

Sorry I meant to add Prove it... Wikipedia is not proof. Prove your secret agent man was right and that was not just an opinion.

And that Secret Service man...if he said that Patsy wasn't the author...is just ONE person...what about the other ten or so that said that Patsy WAS the author.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Sure- IF SHE WAS ALIVE. The killers you mentioned would not bother to remove a corpse.
Keep in mind, LE never saw JBR's body in situ in the wineceller. JR brought her up from the basement unwrapped, leaving the blanket(s) and tape in the wineceller.

Tape and blanket makes more sense on a child about to be removed forcibly from the house than on a corpse.

 

[Blondieskatz]

Hold,
Why would the tape be needed? At what point was the blanket used to wrap JB other than after she had died? Don't forget she sat in the kitchen and had pineapple with her kidnapper.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Hold,
Why would the tape be needed? At what point was the blanket used to wrap JB other than after she had died? Don't forget she sat in the kitchen and had pineapple with her kidnapper.

The idea that JB was wrapped like a papoose after she died is an RDI fabrication. Unless you know somehow she was wrapped after she died, you're kinda just making claims.

For example, how is it you know she sat in the kitchen?

 

[Littledeer]

holdontoyourhat:

In your intruder theory, do you believe that the intruder(s) were already in the house when the Ramsey's came home that night or they came in later?

Just asking............

 

[JMO8778]

And that Secret Service man...if he said that Patsy wasn't the author...is just ONE person...what about the other ten or so that said that Patsy WAS the author.

keep reading...there is a WHOLE lot there he left out,re: the other side of the coin-that Patsy was the author.