Blondieskatz
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2004
- Messages
- 1,336
- Reaction score
- 5
How do you know this? Or is this just another assumption? RDI is riddled with assumptions just like this, including the assumption PR owned the tape AND the cord, when there's no evidence they owned either the tape OR the cord. Very important missing evidence for RDI, that would naturally be missing evidence if an intruder brought the tape and cord. See what I mean?
I don't know that he sat down at the table and wrote the note....who knows where he/she actually wrote the note. But, you can bet it was written inside of that house.
And, you ask which theory. Why would you have more than one? Just give us the most believeable one you have that makes sense according to what evidence is available.