DeeDee249,
BBM: I think it does. Depending on your favorite theory it can demonstrate that it might be inconsistent with what we know, i.e. James Kolar's BDI, which has JonBenet moving from the breakfast bar to the basement, or ST's PDI?
If Patsy made the bottom ponytail on arrival back from the White's, preparing JonBenet for bed, e.g. Pink Barbie Nightgown, then allowed JonBenet to snack pineapple, well James Kolar might be on the button.
Else if Patsy prepared a pineapple snack for JonBenet, allowed her to consume it, then readied her for bed, fashioning her ponytail, etc, that allows for a different scenario.
Sure, I agree, yet when fabricating a crime-scene, Patsy's own construction is contradicted by the addition of the white gap top, and size-12's, items that appear inconsistent with a child that has been prepared for bed, never mind not removing the bottom ponytail, so to match their version of events?
It looks to me as if JonBenet enjoyed a harmonious pineapple snack, chaperoned by Patsy after which her bottom ponytail was fashioned and she dressed for bed?
After the Pineapple Snack JonBenet would not need any ponytail if she simply headed down to the basement, never to return?
If it was PDI, as alleged by Steve Thomas, surely Patsy would pay more attention to the crime-scene details?
That Patsy is willing to lie and distance herself from the evidence is not proof that she knew what took place?
I think, on balance JonBenet had her snack, then dressed for bed, shortly after which, she was sexually assaulted, in her own bedroom, e.g. bloodstain on the pillow, bed unmade, and her bedtime gown later dumped in the wine-cellar?
I raised the possibility of the lower ponytail being staging, simply for completeness, since whilst I agree with your interpretation, i.e. Patsy made the usual bedtime hairstyle, there is the possibility that a prior staging incorporated the lower ponytail so to support a version of events that has JonBenet safely reaching her bed?
.
