JMO8778,
Steve Thomas is not going to tell the world what the investigators lead theory is along with all the evidence, he might want to tell everyone how the case became messed up, who followed false leads, who promoted bogus theories etc, but little new forensic evidence is supplied in his book.
He tells us how he analysed the White's party pictures, but leaves out if he noticed JonBenet was wearing pigtails, or if her black velvet pants seemed bulky because she was wearing size-12's, or even if a forensic comparison had been done on the fibers in her velvet pants. He does
not tell us much about the warrants issued to search for child
, or about the collection of photographs of JonBenet that sparked the search. Also there was nothing about all those soiled pants in JonBenet's underwear drawer, which just underlines my point about him being disingenuous, I am not saying he was outright dishonest.
Sure but read it carefully and he tells you himself its
not conclusive, its just one of the many theories developed and dropped by the investigators, thats why its in the book, his real theory will be inside his head. In his book he has two goals one was to explain why nobody was in court, and the second, to point a finger directly at the Ramsey's and away from Lou Smit's fantasy intruder.
.
