MHamby, didn't think about, thank you! So was he staying in this hotel before he and SF arrived or did he just check in that night?
If I'm not mistaken, he had stayed at the hotel two weeks previous to that night.
MHamby, didn't think about, thank you! So was he staying in this hotel before he and SF arrived or did he just check in that night?
Is this old or new?
"On Thursday, Fox News citing a police source reported that Van der Sloot lied during his confession in which he said he killed Flores for what she had found on his laptop. Eventually, after more interrogation from police, police were able to ascertain from Joran that he had planned to rob Stephanie, not that he killed her because she saw info on his computer, Fox News reported."
http://www.islandcrisis.net/2010/06/fox-news-joran-van-der-sloot-lied-confession/
If I'm not mistaken, he had stayed at the hotel two weeks previous to that night.
Just because someone asked about the tat, can someone snag this photo, scroll down on the left, and see if we can clear up what the tat says? (I know, meaningless, but something to do while waiting to see what charges Peru decides to bring.)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/10/joran-van-der-sloot-took_n_608079.html
I know and I knew I would get flack over what I wrote. However, we do know that all they wanted to do is get him anyway they could.
Also, the second and fourth letters (symbols) appear to me to have markings over them. Particularly, the fourth letter.
As one looking for answers after my child was killed, I can totally understand it. I would want answers no matter how much time had passed and I would most likely pay whatever I could to get them. My personal opinion, though.
I know and I knew I would get flack over what I wrote. However, we do know that all they wanted to do is get him anyway they could.
Is this old or new?
"On Thursday, Fox News citing a police source reported that Van der Sloot lied during his confession in which he said he killed Flores for what she had found on his laptop. Eventually, after more interrogation from police, police were able to ascertain from Joran that he had planned to rob Stephanie, not that he killed her because she saw info on his computer, Fox News reported."
http://www.islandcrisis.net/2010/06/fox-news-joran-van-der-sloot-lied-confession/
I understand they may have wanted to solidify their case, etc. But why not unseal the affidavit at the same time they brought the extortion complaint to light in the press conference on 6/3 rather than waiting until today? And why wasn't it filed with the court until today. That doesn't make sense to me - at all.
As one looking for answers after my child was killed, I can totally understand it. I would want answers no matter how much time had passed and I would most likely pay whatever I could to get them. My personal opinion, though.
WTH was Beth/reps EVEN thinking to go into this deal with the information Joran stated. Oh my goodness, I have a bridge to sell to them.
I can understand if this deal came about within the first year or so, but after every lie, in all forms possible, over five years and they still did this?
:censored:
My deepest sympathy to you and your family over the loss of your child in this manner.
I do apologize to anyone that I may have offended, as that was not my intention.
I have had issues from the onset regarding this case, with the initial "teen travels basically alone to Aruba". I will leave it at that and will not express my thoughts regarding their reasons to go ahead with the desire to get more information. :truce:
Uh Oh, Feds in Alabama in trouble (just as we thought). Not good.
How are we getting these documents???!!! These are not supposed to be public record????
I remember that. There was also some undercover and highly suspicious painting over of some rocks, as I recall.
This is one of the pictures from the Aruba rock painting. There was a video posted on Aru-Bay.com not long after Natalee disappeared. It showed men with search dogs looking in the rocks, then men painting the rocks white in places. Not long after, the web site was disabled. This was an area close to the lighthouse where Joran said he and the Kalpoes took Natalie. At one time Dave was searching in the area and saw a police car in the area with the trunk open. As Dave started driving to the police car they closed the trunk and took off. (this was in Dave's book) There never has really been an explanation for the rock painting. One of Joran's first stories included Natalee falling and hitting her head and her head bleeding.Thanks, Patty. No offense taken and no apology needed - from me anyway.![]()
Please don't let that keep you from expressing your opinions and thoughts. We each come from different and various perspectives and I think that enhances the discussions and helps us to try to understand these matters which are so senseless. :blowkiss:
ETA: I hope I didn't sound too defensive in my initial response. Certainly wasn't intended that way.![]()
Is this old or new?
"On Thursday, Fox News citing a police source reported that Van der Sloot lied during his confession in which he said he killed Flores for what she had found on his laptop. Eventually, after more interrogation from police, police were able to ascertain from Joran that he had planned to rob Stephanie, not that he killed her because she saw info on his computer, Fox News reported."
http://www.islandcrisis.net/2010/06/fox-news-joran-van-der-sloot-lied-confession/