When the complainant is a child , the situation presented is somewhat different, no court,no judge is going to make a child testify. If the child really cannot do it and plenty cannot, it's a rare child that can the case is not exactly dropped, but put aside for adjudication at some later stage of the childs life.
The summons those unfortunate police men were serving on Filby that day, may well have been the same case, with the child now older..It is not improbable.. my own opinion is, it is a different plaintiff and I base this on the premise that child molesters don't start out at 51. He's been doing this a long time . thanks for your perspective though, even though it is erroneous in this instance.