Tuba
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2007
- Messages
- 5,691
- Reaction score
- 67
I guess it was over in Sidebar 17 that I was pursuing C.M. at law for slandering Juan Martinez. She had accused him on network T.V. of lying & withholding evidence. However, let's not leave it there. She also stated that she was disappointed in her own counsel because they hadn't reached for photos & testimony (in California) that would have corroborated her black and blue/bruising claims. She indicated that this was just one of her grievances. Nurmi & Willmott would have had reasons for their inability to procure this evidence; it was not negligence nor indifference. Why didn't the defendant herself persuade Angela to offer substantiation? She had family visits. It didn't help that she called her sister "stupid", of course. I didn't see Angela in court after that came out. But C.M.'s mother could have intervened & the family could have located the photos if they exist. Anyway, her slurs against counsel definitely reflected upon them in the exercise of their profession injuriously and were therefor slanderous. I do think WS are correct in suspecting the attorneys corrected some of the highly questionable material on C.M.'s website. "Artist & Survivor" my left elbow. She sits convicted of premeditated aggravated capital murder, verdict of a jury of her peers. That does not = a judgment of survivor, that = judgment aggressive, intentional killer, cruelest kind. Without justification, a term at law.