Prosecutors have new material and information that they dont want released to the pub

[kaRN]

My recollection is that they were to sit down and figure out a schedule releasing discovery information, not to go over discovery. I may be mistaken though as that is only from memory.

The judge didn`t order the defense to get the FBI etc lawyers `in here` either. :banghead:

 

[skygirl]

Orrrrr....wasn't Mallory deposed in the last couple of months? Told some things that she is afraid will not be taken well by the A's?? Pure Speculation only

I've been holding my breath/hoping that Mallory is/has been going rogue, and needs this 'protection'.

OR better yet.........

What are the chances that KC communicated with LE finally w/out JB's knowledge? I have heard and seen her time and time again kind -of- wanting to do this, only at the 11th hour being stopped by JB. Could this be the case? Is it possible? (prolly not)

It says: “ Certain materials and information have come into the possession of Law Enforcement”

Certain materialS: - What exactly are these materials? Plural.

AND Information: - What kind of “information”?

Who could have and or give LE anything material? AND Information?

What are the ramifications if someone in JB’s office gave up the goods, and they aren’t quite sure if they fall under the ‘privilege’ law? Or the “goods giver” receiver is the one seeking protection?

Just some things I’m marinating on. All jmho.

ETA: maybe LE DID go back to universal and pulled KC's computer forensics from when she worked temp. in the HR office?


*When they refer to materials, I’m asking/wondering is this a legal term or actual materials as in noun, things?

 

[doogiesgirl]

Well well well.....I'm on pins and needles....dying to know what the "new material and info from investigators" is!!

I can't narrow it to one possibility. I think it could be any of the following:

* DC telling ALL he knows, possibly implicating either CA, GA. LA, JB as being the person
on the phone with him when he went to the remains site. That person could be who
sent him to that area to begin with, using info from KC. It's also possible that DC
may have told them that "whoever" it was on the phone either wanted the body
moved or wanted false evidence planted to implicate an innocent party IMO.

* I don't think it impossible that they've come up with information that implicates one
of the A's being involved in helping KC AFTER the fact in the disposal of Caylee's
body. Or discovered info that the A's are involved in a willing cover-up after
her Oct arrest by passing info illegally through JB some way, as to what to cover up.


* Could be a new video or pictures that someone has just recently realized the
importance of or has only recently worked up the nerve to report. Could even be
a complete stranger who just happened to be at the right place at the right time.
??? Maybe??

* Long shot---but could even be previously UNREPORTED information from TM (who
stayed with KC for what?....a week or so?)

* Annie? Could she have finally decided to come completely clean? There were a lot
of answers in her interview that didn't ring true to me and I always had the impression
that she knew much more than she was telling. MOO

* The most viable possibility to me is that tracking KC's internet activity has finally
hit on something....and they want time to continue following this. Such as the Z
myspace account or other coincidental internet activity that possibly wasn't in-
vestigated early on due to the case load. Maybe an internet expert was finally put
onto this area and has only recently been able to connect the dots (so to speak)
back to KC. Maybe they've found evidence of illegal activity in thief or porn
or KC trying to create a red herring with the "zanny" stuff....or even her ordering
some "deadly toxins" through a fake identity/to another address, to be used on
Caylee or "who knows who". If the investigative info and materials are internet
related, the possibilities are endless as to what they've found IMO, knowing what
we know of how KC's mind works.

Personally I don't think this evidence has anything to do with exonerating KC as if it did, the judge would not allow a delay IMO. But I know next to nothing about how our legal system works so that is purely my own supposition on the situation.

:cow:

 

[Spangle]

Nanny has been found?
The Blackberry has been found?

 

[Tulessa]

The State Attorney's Office has asked for a private hearing with Orange Circuit Court Judge Stan Strickland to discuss "certain materials and information" that have "come into the possession of Law Enforcement."

According to the state's latest motion, the materials and information are releasable to Anthony's defense and the public through the discovery process.

"There is good cause to delay disclosure of these materials and information," Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton wrote in the motion filed Wednesday.

Ashton's request asks the private hearing be recorded by a court reporter.

Article:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...0,917467.story

 

[notthatsmart]

Maybe this does have something to do with the Judge's authority. The SA says to the Judge, you do not have the authority to force the Fbi or the Body farm to turn over discovery. The Judge says to Jb, you will have to ask for the discovery from the Fbi and Bodyfarm. If they say no, then we will have to get counsel from them in here.

So, perhaps the Judge may not have the authority to force them to turn over discovery, but he does have the authority to make them explain themselves. So, now its the moment of truth for SA. They will certainly have to expose this information now, because if they don't, the counsel's will. They want a little more time to prepare for this, and they want to put the decision on the Judge so they don't look bad. Of course I am just speculating here and Moo

 

[AutomaticAuttie]

Nanny has been found?
The Blackberry has been found?

I am thinking it's something along these lines. Because if the DA had something that benefited them, a "slam drunk" piece of evidence they why not release it? One would think that if it was in favor of the DA they would want it out there!

 

[AutomaticAuttie]

Maybe this does have something to do with the Judge's authority. The SA says to the Judge, you do not have the authority to force the Fbi or the Body farm to turn over discovery. The Judge says to Jb, you will have to ask for the discovery from the Fbi and Bodyfarm. If they say no, then we will have to get counsel from them in here.

So, perhaps the Judge may not have the authority to force them to turn over discovery, but he does have the authority to make them explain themselves. So, now its the moment of truth for SA. They will certainly have to expose this information now, because if they don't, the counsel's will. They want a little more time to prepare for this, and they want to put the decision on the Judge so they don't look bad. Of course I am just speculating here and Moo

If this were the case, then why do it behind closed doors? Why not state that in a montion?

 

[Tulessa]

Maybe this does have something to do with the Judge's authority. The SA says to the Judge, you do not have the authority to force the Fbi or the Body farm to turn over discovery. The Judge says to Jb, you will have to ask for the discovery from the Fbi and Bodyfarm. If they say no, then we will have to get counsel from them in here.

So, perhaps the Judge may not have the authority to force them to turn over discovery, but he does have the authority to make them explain themselves. So, now its the moment of truth for SA. They will certainly have to expose this information now, because if they don't, the counsel's will. They want a little more time to prepare for this, and they want to put the decision on the Judge so they don't look bad. Of course I am just speculating here and Moo

With all due respect, from everything I have read the SA has been above board on EVERYTHING. If we have a moment of truth, it will be from Casey Anthony, and we ALL know, that's not gonna happen.:innocent:

 

[Tulessa]

If this were the case, then why do it behind closed doors? Why not state that in a montion?

Bingo. Thank you.

 

[Intermezzo]

Do you think that maybe after all this time someone was going over security video from back in the day and spotted KC and turned it over to LE? I know that's a looooog shot but I guess it could happen. How long do companies keep security tapes?

BBM
I do not know
I will take a guess and say that it is dictated by company policy and the technology used.

 

[A_News_Junkie]

Nanny has been found?
The Blackberry has been found?

Do you mean the BlackJack cell phone she supposedly lost at JBP?

 

[sumbunny]

Correct me if i'm wrong. Wasn't there some sort of camera on a lampost near the dump area on suburban?

I thought for sure there was a picture taken of the street lamp, and what clearly looked like a camera.

 

[AutomaticAuttie]

What if this……Upon their facts and findings the prosecution has stumbled upon another possible person of interest. They are don’t want to tip their hand if turns out to be nothing. They also don’t want the person who they are investigating to catch on he/she is being investigated. And lastly, they don’t want the defense to know yet either in case it turns out to be nothing. That would show a weakness and possible reasonable doubt the defense could use against them if it turns out to be nothing. JMO

 

[skygirl]

What if this……Upon their facts and findings the prosecution has stumbled upon another possible person of interest. They are don’t want to tip their hand if turns out to be nothing. They also don’t want the person who they are investigating to catch on he/she is being investigated. And lastly, they don’t want the defense to know yet either in case it turns out to be nothing. That would show a weakness and possible reasonable doubt the defense could use against them if it turns out to be nothing. JMO

I see what you are saying, but wouldn't it qualify as an "on-going investigation"-therfore the SA doesn't have to submit this info as discovery?

 

[kaRN]

Whatever this motion means, the defense silence is deafening isn`t it? A week ago they repeated the mantra that the SA was witholding discovery. Yesterday the SA office files a motion requesting that officially.
Morning news shows pass, Insession is off the air in 1.5hrs and not a single word of protest from the defense. Usually they can`t keep quiet. Very curious indeed. :waitasec:

 

[JWG]

Maybe this does have something to do with the Judge's authority. The SA says to the Judge, you do not have the authority to force the Fbi or the Body farm to turn over discovery. The Judge says to Jb, you will have to ask for the discovery from the Fbi and Bodyfarm. If they say no, then we will have to get counsel from them in here.

So, perhaps the Judge may not have the authority to force them to turn over discovery, but he does have the authority to make them explain themselves. So, now its the moment of truth for SA. They will certainly have to expose this information now, because if they don't, the counsel's will. They want a little more time to prepare for this, and they want to put the decision on the Judge so they don't look bad. Of course I am just speculating here and Moo

I don't think the judge's authority is at issue at all. The prosecution motion reads, in part (emphasis mine):

1. Certain materials and information have come into the possession of Law Enforcement.
2. Those materials and information are discoverable under F.R.C.P. 3.220.
3. There is good cause to delay disclosure of these materials and information pursuant to F.R.C.P. 3.220(k).

So they have some stuff that they feel should not be disclosed to the defense just yet. My opinion is the judge will grant the motion to see the evidence without the defense present, and then will decide whether or not to delay disclosure.

 

[chefmom]

Whatever this motion means, the defense silence is deafening isn`t it? A week ago they repeated the mantra that the SA was witholding discovery. Yesterday the SA office files a motion requesting that officially.
Morning news shows pass, Insession is off the air in 1.5hrs and not a single word of protest from the defense. Usually they can`t keep quiet. Very curious indeed. :waitasec:

Yes! Crickets from their side of the hall! Me thinks the SS Anthony has just hit an iceburg!

 

[gibby207]

Whatever this motion means, the defense silence is deafening isn`t it? A week ago they repeated the mantra that the SA was witholding discovery. Yesterday the SA office files a motion requesting that officially.
Morning news shows pass, Insession is off the air in 1.5hrs and not a single word of protest from the defense. Usually they can`t keep quiet. Very curious indeed. :waitasec:

That's what I was thinking.... If it were damning to the prosecution, I'd expect JB to be prancing around already. Question is WHO is SA trying to protect?

 

[sumbunny]

Perhaps it isn't politically correct to destroy baez's career as a (cough) attorney in the public eye. So the S.A wants a meeting with JS behind closed doors without Jose to discuss what needs to be done prior to letting this discovery be released?

Seeing as the trial has been pushed way back, without much fuss from the SA, perhaps they know a new attorney may be needed? ( dc comes to mind with this latest new discovery)