Prosecutors New Motion for Private Meeting w/Judge but w/out Defense #2

[kaRN]

This is copied from Hal B's latest blog. How much do you want to bet this new obsession will replace RK here at WS, at least while we absorb the new doc's tomorrow.


http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/en...k-the-stand.html/comment-page-2#comment-66553

Posted by: Juror 13 Too | Monday, February 15, 2010 at 4:54 PM
As I am going through the “Grand Canyon” can someone answer a question before going on to ask Casey more: Why isn’t the trash lady being held responsible for tampering with evidence? And why hasn’t the law officials/investigators taking the trash from her to investigate more? Seems like valuable evidence in that bag. Your take? Or am I behind on times with this?

 

[kaRN]

Does any of it really make any difference? Does JB's bad writing skills make Kc guilty of premeditated murder? Are there laws against bad writing skills? I think the Judge understands the motion the way it is written. IMO

No but it will sure help to convict her. His verbal skills are even worse lol!

 

[Tulessa]

I wonder if tomorrow's doc dump has anything to do with this?

 

[dsntslp]

It is said that cases and contracts have been won or lost based on "and, if, or & but". Yes, writing skills speak to the education level and attentiveness to detail of the writer, imo.

Once trash is set out on the curb here in Fl it is up for grabs, the exception is the recycling material. Trash lady did nothing wrong.

Even if LE were to confiscate the trash there is a chain of custody issue. IMO

 

[Just Jayla]

I wonder if tomorrow's doc dump has anything to do with this?

Me, too-They said at the last hearing that 90% of the discovery had been turned over, so it could still be a dud-But here's hoping for a least a little something to chew on for a while.

 

[Macushla]

Does any of it really make any difference? Does JB's bad writing skills make Kc guilty of premeditated murder? Are there laws against bad writing skills? I think the Judge understands the motion the way it is written. IMO

Jb's lack of skill in his chosen profession most certainly does not make KC guilty of premeditated murder - she did that all by herself!

 

[steadychick]

Is it possible that the private hearing has already taken place and the delayed release of evidence was denied? And maybe that is what we will see tomorrow?

 

[cyberborg]

I wonder if tomorrow's doc dump has anything to do with this?

I wondered if the Prosecution were trying to protect something damning for KC but with the Defense objection to the private hearing they decided to just go ahead and dump it into Discovery and let the Defense deal with it. Here's your sign.

We can dream can't we?

 

[Tulessa]

I wondered if the Prosecution were trying to protect something damning for KC but with the Defense objection to the private hearing they decided to just go ahead and dump it into Discovery and let the Defense deal with it. Here's your sign.

We can dream can't we?

I'm going to bed and gonna dream for big things tomorrow.

 

[kew17]

Is it possible that the private hearing has already taken place and the delayed release of evidence was denied? And maybe that is what we will see tomorrow?

Wouldn't that be a treat! Doubt it, but yummy to think about!

 

[CarolinaMoon]

Bill Sheaffer talks to Kathi Belich about the new evidence. After that, he says a great deal about the motion. Very good video, and I finally understand what's going on with the State and why the defense goofed again.

http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

 

[The World According]

Maybe Brad, Lee or someone will advise the Anthonys to try to implore upon Casey to change lawyers. This is not even funny anymore how horribly the case is being mishandled, it is borderline malpractice, imo!!!!

He explains here that the state was well within the rules to ask for what they did and the defense had no hope, none, whatsoever of prevailing.

I agree with Bill. BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis Of Evidence Released 02/16/10
http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

 

[A_News_Junkie]

Maybe Brad, Lee or someone will advise the Anthonys to try to implore upon Casey to change lawyers. This is not even funny anymore how horribly the case is being mishandled, it is borderline malpractice, imo!!!!

He explains here that the state was well within the rules to ask for what they did and the defense had no hope, none, whatsoever of prevailing.

I agree with Bill. BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis Of Evidence Released 02/16/10
http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

Yes and his face _ OMG showed his own personal utter disgust at the rookie moves and borderline incompetence. Sheaffer actually looked physcially uncomfortable at the mere mention of this debacle.

 

[QB.]

Is it possible that the private hearing has already taken place and the delayed release of evidence was denied? And maybe that is what we will see tomorrow?

I believe the private hearing has probably taken place already, just my opinion.

 

[The World According]

Is it possible that the private hearing has already taken place and the delayed release of evidence was denied? And maybe that is what we will see tomorrow?

According to Mr. Scheaffer, yes it is very likely that the hearing has taken place. He said the state was within the rules of procedure to ask for it and very likely was granted their request. The defense seems to have a very poor understanding, again.

I don't think this document dump had anything to do with it.

________________________

 

[Kentjbkent]

Bill Sheaffer talks to Kathi Belich about the new evidence. After that, he says a great deal about the motion. Very good video, and I finally understand what's going on with the State and why the defense goofed again.

http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

Picked up something that made me :waitasec:in this video....around the 7:58 marker...

BS states "There is no way the Judge WAS NOT GOING to grant this motion as it is provided by in the law" (not actual quote...paraphrased)

So I am wondering if indeed this ex parte DID already take place (or at least JS is entertaining future meeting)

BS did NOT state....."There is no way the Judge WILL NOT grant this motion as it is provided by in the law"

Past tense vs future tense?

Hmmm.....:waitasec:

 

[Kentjbkent]

Maybe Brad, Lee or someone will advise the Anthonys to try to implore upon Casey to change lawyers. This is not even funny anymore how horribly the case is being mishandled, it is borderline malpractice, imo!!!!

He explains here that the state was well within the rules to ask for what they did and the defense had no hope, none, whatsoever of prevailing.

I agree with Bill. BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis Of Evidence Released 02/16/10
http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

OT: I just LOVE BS suspenders in this video! :woohoo:

 

[cyberborg]

I believe the private hearing has probably taken place already, just my opinion.

I completely agree, .... and today's Discovery release ommitted the new evidence and materials that the Prosecution had asked to keep secret and delay until later.

:dance::woohoo::dance:

 

[denjet]

Bill Sheaffer talks to Kathi Belich about the new evidence. After that, he says a great deal about the motion. Very good video, and I finally understand what's going on with the State and why the defense goofed again.

http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

You have to love Bill!
He made my day talking about the states request for ex-parte hearing with the judge !!

Kathi Belich:
"What do you make of ... the defense's objection to the prosecutions request for an ex parte in camera meeting with the judge ... they are telling the judge to deny that based on the fact that they asked for something like that last year were denied but is it interesting that they were denied that but didn't ask for a hearing on it ... they just asked for the judge to deny it ..."

Bill Shaeffer:
This whole defense response was entirely innappropriate for the motion for ex-parte hearing that the state filed .. it was innappropriate because what they're saying is "well, wait a minute, we wanted to meet with you judge by ourselves and you woudn't let us"" well the rules of criminal procedure don't provide that the defense can do that, the rules of criminal procedure provide if there's evidence in possession of the state that is sensitive and may affect the investigation of other crimes or maybe irrelevent in the end that they are allowed by rule to go before the judge and present that to the judge so the judge says OK, I'm not going to make you turn it over to the defense yet, until we explore it thoroughly. That is provided by for the rules of procedure and the response to the state's motion didn't site any legal basis for the court not to grant that ... it was just one of the se schoolground arguements well he hit me first and now I'm gonna hit him back ... it's ridiculous ...

Kathi Belich: and does it tell you anything that they didn't ask for a hearing ?

Bill Shaeffer: because there's no basis for them to ask for the hearing ... their response is without merit and even if they had asked for the hearing, the bottom line is that the judge was not going to deny this ex-parte hearing because it is provided by for the rules ....

:dance:
Thank you Mr. Bill !!

 

[Snaz]

Order Granting The State's Motion For An In Camera Proceeding and Denying an Ex Parte Meeting

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22593009/detail.html