Such as, why did it take sooooo very long for a coroner to show up at a murder scene in the first place. Was he not called immediately, or was he called and he was just busy with it being the holidays and all?[/quote
It's funny you should mention it, but this very matter came up on a tv programme I watched just two evenings ago called "Real CSI". I don't normally watch TV at this time of night, but I was muddling about and it caught my attention.
The case was one of a man found shot in a building site in California. It explained that in the first instance, the scene of crime officers go in because they have such a very short period of time in which to collect evidence before the crime scene becomes contaminated. In this particular case, the body was found in the morning and the scene of crime officers worked all day and into the evening collecting evidence from the surrounding area. They took casts of footprints and tyre tracks and when it grew dark, they floodlit the area so they could keep working. Only when they had finished, did they call the coroner and tell him he could come to the body now. By that time, the body had been discovered for almost 24 hours.
I was surprised at this because I thought - surely it was important to determine TOD etc, however, I suppose a dead body isn't going anywhere, whereas microscopic evidence could be destroyed by a single person walking through the crime scene.