GUILTY Australia - 3 dead after eating wild mushrooms, Leongatha, Victoria, Aug 2023 *Arrest* #21

  • #221
  • #222

Kyle, Jackie O avoid charges over Erin Patterson mushroom trial remark​

That's a shame.
I think Kyle is vile, and Jackie is too, by default. Kyle needs to be held to account for a lot of the things he says. I can't even stand listening to his voice for a nano second.
 
  • #223
they keep getting away with it. Feels like connections count for way too much in this country because for people like them, sub judice laws don't apply apparently.
 
  • #224
That's a shame.
I think Kyle is vile, and Jackie is too, by default. Kyle needs to be held to account for a lot of the things he says. I can't even stand listening to his voice for a nano second.

Birds of a feather ...
 
  • #225
Birds of a feather ...
I still think she must be secretly in love with him, though, she shouldn’t be - he’s not worthy.
 
  • #226
I still think she must be secretly in love with him, though, she shouldn’t be - he’s not worthy.

To use another applicable proverb: If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.
 
  • #227
To use another applicable proverb: If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.
Couldn’t agree more. Erin’s rabid friends got more than fleas, IMO

It still blows my mind that she’s got her best friend by her side. Why? Why would you support a mass murderer? They didn’t even know her IRL until she was arrested. 😳
 
  • #228
It's the platonic* version of women who fall in love with serial killers and marry them.

*well, I'm assuming.
 
  • #229
December 7 all of the other episodes of the Stan doco are coming out. 2 very good friends are on it. Can’t wait 😍
 
  • #230
December 7 all of the other episodes of the Stan doco are coming out. 2 very good friends are on it. Can’t wait 😍

I don't have Stan so I'll need to wait for the reviews.
 
  • #231
I don't have Stan so I'll need to wait for the reviews.

Might be a free trial around - hopefully - because they really don’t deserve subscriptions 🤣
 
  • #232
There’s someone asking on social media what’s happening with the court case - so I’ll answer here.

One of Erin’s friends is taking another ex friend (yours truly) to court to restrict my ability to post online honestly and openly. It won’t succeed, because it’s based on ridiculous (lack of) logic and understanding of the court process. It’s a bully move, and I won’t stop sharing openly about my experiences with who I consider a psychopath (Erin) and her flying monkey friends.

They should take a defamation suit but they won’t because the things I’ve said are 100% backed up by evidence and well, they’re not famous even though they wish they were.

This person tried to have my sister evicted from the recent court hearing because seeing her name on the Webex chat allegedly made her feel “intimidated”, luckily the registrar isn’t able to be manipulated and refused.

They also took their complaint to the police but of course the police refused to act because no laws were broken.

It’s exactly what I expect from people who are friends with Erin Patterson. They’re all stupid, manipulated conspiracy theory bullies who don’t seem to be able to grasp that opinions and open communication isn’t a criminal act - they really should be reflecting on their friendships and support of someone who was planning to kill their entire family.

I proposed an undertaking whereby the person accusing me of the things they’re doing to me is restricted from doing the things I’m accused (wrongly) of, and I’d be happy to agree because I wasn’t doing what was alleged anyway, but that didn’t satisfy the person.

This person and their “friends” have relentlessly harassed, defamed and bullied me and I’m looking very forward to revealing the truth and evidence in court.

Ridiculous bullying nonsense IMO.
 
Last edited:
  • #233
There’s someone asking on social media what’s happening with the court case - so I’ll answer here.

One of Erin’s friends is taking another ex friend (yours truly) to court to restrict my ability to post online honestly and openly. It won’t succeed, because it’s based on ridiculous (lack of) logic and understanding of the court process. It’s a bully move, and I won’t stop sharing openly about my experiences with who I consider a psychopath (Erin) and her flying monkey friends.

They should take a defamation suit but they won’t because the things I’ve said are 100% backed up by evidence and well, they’re not famous even though they wish they were.

This person tried to have my sister evicted from the recent court hearing because seeing her name on the Webex chat allegedly made her feel “intimidated”, luckily the registrar isn’t able to be manipulated and refused.

They also took their complaint to the police but of course the police refused to act because no laws were broken.

It’s exactly what I expect from people who are friends with Erin Patterson. They’re all stupid, manipulated conspiracy theory bullies who don’t seem to be able to grasp that opinions and open communication isn’t a criminal act - they really should be reflecting on their friendships and support of someone who was planning to kill their entire family.

I proposed an undertaking whereby the person accusing me of the things they’re doing to me is restricted from doing the things I’m accused (wrongly) of, and I’d be happy to agree because I wasn’t doing what was alleged anyway, but that didn’t satisfy the person.

This person and their “friends” have relentlessly harassed, defamed and bullied me and I’m looking very forward to revealing the truth and evidence in court.

Ridiculous bullying nonsense IMO.

They obviously don't have anything better to do with their time.
I am sorry to hear that they are wasting your time.

imo
 
  • #234
There’s someone asking on social media what’s happening with the court case - so I’ll answer here.

One of Erin’s friends is taking another ex friend (yours truly) to court to restrict my ability to post online honestly and openly. It won’t succeed, because it’s based on ridiculous (lack of) logic and understanding of the court process. It’s a bully move, and I won’t stop sharing openly about my experiences with who I consider a psychopath (Erin) and her flying monkey friends.

They should take a defamation suit but they won’t because the things I’ve said are 100% backed up by evidence and well, they’re not famous even though they wish they were.

This person tried to have my sister evicted from the recent court hearing because seeing her name on the Webex chat allegedly made her feel “intimidated”, luckily the registrar isn’t able to be manipulated and refused.

They also took their complaint to the police but of course the police refused to act because no laws were broken.

It’s exactly what I expect from people who are friends with Erin Patterson. They’re all stupid, manipulated conspiracy theory bullies who don’t seem to be able to grasp that opinions and open communication isn’t a criminal act - they really should be reflecting on their friendships and support of someone who was planning to kill their entire family.

I proposed an undertaking whereby the person accusing me of the things they’re doing to me is restricted from doing the things I’m accused (wrongly) of, and I’d be happy to agree because I wasn’t doing what was alleged anyway, but that didn’t satisfy the person.

This person and their “friends” have relentlessly harassed, defamed and bullied me and I’m looking very forward to revealing the truth and evidence in court.

Ridiculous bullying nonsense IMO.
Keep calling them flying monkeys because that's exactly what they are. Go ahead try to sue me Erin!!!
 
  • #235
Keep calling them flying monkeys because that's exactly what they are. Go ahead try to sue me Erin!!!
Oh they are absolutely flying moneys and I’ll continue referring to them as such . Birds of a feather….
Years ago they succeeded in silencing me because their bullying along with Erin was relentless and I was having personal issues and felt extremely overwhelmed, so I backed away. I’m a different person now and won’t tolerate it for a second.
 
  • #236
About the upcoming Stan documentary

 
  • #237
Well. Not going to spoil it but it’s a bit haphazard and bizarre with the focus on the (free) journalists who work for channel 9, who owns Stan.

It seems rushed, poorly told and hard to follow even for someone who knows every detail of the case.

Was glad to see her flying monkey friends pretty much completely excluded though, even though they told everyone they are stars on it. 🤣🙄

I was a bit miffed at really important points being brushed over - and the focus on her (fake) eating disorder being taken as fact.

One of my text messages was read out but nothing from our knowledge of Erin was exposed - which is great because they weren’t allowed to.

The cinematography and Dr Chris were fabulous, though.

IMO
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
1,323
Total visitors
1,451

Forum statistics

Threads
635,569
Messages
18,679,248
Members
243,301
Latest member
lexlex7
Back
Top