View attachment 88906
I kinda feel the same way about the damage Sarah, it seems relevant.... somehow. Although I am not convinced it was SA, and I think it is very possible that she left the property and then something happened. As far as I can remember, there was no DNA on that light cover too. But the damage.. the spatter on the back door... knowing she was in the back of the RAV4 at some point.... the missing tool.... I dunno.
As for her previous clients....her first appointment that day, I think the defense asked about her vehicle, he said it looked "new". No mention of damage.
I am not sure about the laws there, but here... driving around with a signal light gone... might get you pulled over, I can't imagine she drove around like that for days or weeks (and no report of an accident)
ETA: sorry the missing poster is not good.... best I could find for now lol