freespeech
Inactive
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 933
- Reaction score
- 5
A good "once over" with a vacuum cleaner and a "wipe down" would have taken care of any evidence at the crime scene.
Inparadise, I agree as well. A "hazemat" suit as suggested by a previous poster would not have been necessary here. The carpet could have easily been vacuumed and surfaces wiped down. I have read that dry sheets are especially effective in removing fingerprints. I recall seeing a dryer sheet in one of the evidence photos. I wonder if the knives, door frames etc. were tested for dryer sheet residue. That should have been an easy test.
I tell you what I think is so odd about this case is that sdso failed to perform an elementary and basic investigation. Something as simple as checking for dryer sheet residue on the knife blades doesn't seem to have been done. The standard and unscientific sdso response to answer why something was not done is to state that they didn't do it because all the evidence pointed to suicide. The problem with that is when you try to extract their suicide evidence there isn't any because none was tested so you end up going into an illogical, reasonless and circular argument. This is why I feel they should have a brand new investigation here to wash away the previously unfounded sdso assertions. As long as sdso has any say-so in the matter they are going to try to avoid embarrassment by defending their erroneous findings.
However, sdso cannot go back and try to edit their blunders because Bremner and the Zahaus have the original version of what was done. I wonder if the Zauhas will ever release those records to the public. I would think that they would have that right if they wanted to do that, no?