Paladine
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2008
- Messages
- 3,762
- Reaction score
- 65
Very good discussions......
To get a better understanding we can use the cliche "It is what it is". In this case a suicide is a suicide and a homicide is a homicide. The events that lead up to the death will indicate which it which.
If we witness a person jumping from a bridge (no one pushing him) the conclusion of a suicide can be made easily. If there are no eye witnesses then information is needed to validate the claim of suicide.
Going back to the cliche a suicide would/should have been cut and dry with a note and a simple death. Often you see the event occur in a closet or such. The more elaborate it gets the further away from the norm it goes. At a certain point past the norm deception starts to take form. When deception is identified the scales starts to tip to homicide and the many different facets (Murder, criminal and so forth).
In RN's case the initial investigation starts off questionable in that the scene was altered which compromises the investigation (no one saw RN in the natural position of death.) This starts the questioning of events.
Questions are further induced by AS claim to make a revival attempt with the found positioning of RN questioning his account not to mention the nudity of her body this takes the case off the norm.
I don't think someone set out to murder her, It does not look like she was in a state of depression to commit suicide which leads to the potential of an accidental death and a cover up that followed.
Here is the point that brings AS first in the pool of suspects. A body that has been hung has certain conditions in place which some of those conditions are visually disturbing and indicates death. For AS to think that he could have revived her he had to have been near the TOD.
A jump to death would have broken the neck and the visual signs of death would have been present negating the need for revival.
These factors plays an important part and the forensic results will validate the true cause of death and the inconsistencies be eliminated.
I think LE has the scene mapped out they just need the forensic to collaborate it and it does have a twist other wise they would have stated the facts long ago.
Inobu
Verbatim quotes from Police presser:
"reporting party told the responding officers he had found Nalepa with a rope around her neck and hanging from a balcony off the main house."
"Adam S. informed us that he cut her down when he found her"
"When the first units from Coronodo Police arrived they believed she was deceased yet they performed life saving measures, anyway, until the fire dept. showed uo to pronounce her"
Was she hanging by the neck? "That is what we were told from the reporting party (AS) when he found her""
"numerous items of evidence, the scene was quite suspicious"
"Not ready to disclose what the material was for the bindings, there was a rope suspending her"
911 caller said: "there was a woman on the property who appeared to be dead"
Did Adam heard any sign of struggle on property? "We're not ready to disclose that information"
Last seen alive: "Tuesday evening by Adam".
http://www.cbs8.com/story/15075598/...oCatNo=default&clipId=6051226&redirected=true