Sorry guys but I'm getting a little worried...This is not sounding good for prosecution at this point.
Mahalo I thought his name sounded familiar.
What are the dates that jodi originally went pro se...and had atty client priveledge with others? And what timeframe in relation to this incident? TIA
Oh! So sorry. Shouldn't have opined my opinion about JSS. I forgot...
I really don't think much of this matters at all, the crux is where is the mirror image the defense made that shows all thisthey say their expert found?
Based on what's been filed by both parties, JM's version of events makes a lot more sense to me. I'm just saying that to keep the record clean for appeal the judge needs to let the defense try to prove their version today.
the issue will be that this is something Jodi will use as appellate material, whatever the outcome of this hearing she now has something she will use to argue her conviction is unsafe, not very professional by all those who were present and either powered up or watched as it was powered up against proper forensic protocola