Virginal and naive :giggle:
I'm serious! Know you're trying to catch up (via tweets, no less) ... but one of Dr F's assertions was that, using her scientifically-sound data points, TA was the more sexually experienced and sexually assertive of the two (if I understood the Trial Twitter-verse correctly). And it was this sexualized, controlling "T-Dogg" persona that demeaned and used the less-experienced, emotionally-invested JA.
As to catching up: Probably the most significant "stuff" is the assertion of Prosecutorial Misconduct and innuendo of police misconduct arising from the latest analysis of TA's laptop. Can't hope to give you a synopsis, because ... WTF? I don't pretend to understand how both the Mesa Police and the DT's first computer expert can find ONE truth in zeroes and ones ... and the latest DT expert (remember the "reflection in the eye" guy?) can find a completely different "truth" in zeroes and ones.
The evidentiary hearing for this was released on video (no jury present ... can't tell you the date) ... and another hearing is coming up on Dec 4th. Since this will be without a jury present, I'm assuming we'll be able to actually see it. But who knows
