Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/09-11

[Myvice]

I don't understand if BN is trying to introduce from these working clones or from the original.

Can he show on the original where the is?

If he can't show it on the original I don't see how it could be used?

I'm super lost.

 

[LaLaw2000]

Why do they need 90-minute lunch breaks? This ain't Paris. :gaah:

And it ain't Mexico where everyone gets a siesta!

 

[Shadowboy]

From bk....HD #1 he looked at was the one dworkin used for trial. Made 12/09. It is an exact image of the original 2008 (clone?) HD 2-4 are not in same format. EO-1.

Just to further confuse everyone Here are a few tweets from the first evidentiary hearing. Neumeister being questioned:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial • 3s 3 seconds ago
Juan asking BN about 2 trips to Mesa PD.
BN inspected TA's drive.
1st visit took photo of hard drive, 2nd cloned. #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer • 1m1 minute ago
Neumeister: "You guys have the original, I'm just taking a picture of it."

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial • 3s 4 seconds ago
Juan wants to confirm that BN provided him an image of the very first image he took of TA's drive. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial • 24s 24 seconds ago
Juan requests that the Judge require him to turn it over.
Judge says yes.
BN says it's encrypted so he won't be able to open it. #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer • 4m4 minutes ago
Stephens says Willmott can return to redirect examination. Martinez reiterates that he wants unencrypted image. Fragments of conversation.

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts • 3m3 minutes ago
Neumeister asks if he heard Martinez say correctly that Dworkin's copy was created in 2008. Wilmott says yes. #JodiArias

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts • 3m3 minutes ago
Neumeister asks why all the files on it say they were created in 2009? Wilmott: good question. #JodiArias

 

[Hope4More]

Bk....the incinerator file was empty and hidden in recycle file. JM said the deleted 7k files could have been in it.

 

[bsk]

I know 0 about computers but is the implication that meister installed the incinerator file to get rid of other files then added files and tried to get rid of the incinerator file? JMO

That certainly appears to be where Juan is heading. He could prove it if BN would turn over what he started with, but of course he's hiding that for that very reason it seems.

 

[04009margaret]

Just a couple of points re BN testimony. On 1st day of hearing he said he went to Mesa PD & created 2 clones (this is what JM wants). He also claimed that TA searched for using key words, these links were not attributed to a virus they were specifically searched for. He said these links were in the history not in the registry so because of that they were not caused by virus. Well BN needs to go back to computer school as I just proved him wrong on my own laptop. I went to a PSP site (extra ) that is well known for these types of links. I looked at the recent xvid releases & the second I clinked onto the page 2 I got 2 extra search windows. One was for finding kinky chat friends & the other was pure . So my 1 original search window turned into 3 windows, then I clicked for the next page & another extra window opened. I now have in my history that I never entered a search for.

 

[Chelly]

This trial has become beyond absurd. Tulips will bloom before closing arguments!

 

[Tuba]

The YouPorn website could be one which is inviting personally created contributions. I am not about to pursue this by accessing it. Just a possibility because of a suspicious name. Like potboiler, I want to know the date this site was hit, for the same reason. What might Arias have contributed?

 

[Nali87]

OMG! My computers would have some on it due to the my going to certain sites during some trials/cases. Doesn't mean this old woman habitually looks at , though!
I see your point!

Uh huh. Suuuure. (JK.)

 

[wenwe4]

Just a couple of points re BN testimony. On 1st day of hearing he said he went to Mesa PD & created 2 clones (this is what JM wants). He also claimed that TA searched for using key words, these links were not attributed to a virus they were specifically searched for. He said these links were in the history not in the registry so because of that they were not caused by virus. Well BN needs to go back to computer school as I just proved him wrong on my own laptop. I went to a PSP site (extra ) that is well known for these types of links. I looked at the recent xvid releases & the second I clinked onto the page 2 I got 2 extra search windows. One was for finding kinky chat friends & the other was pure . So my 1 original search window turned into 3 windows, then I clicked for the next page & another extra window opened. I now have in my history that I never entered a search for.

Oh no . . . wait til you see the ads in your fb page now! (quick somebody send her some bleach!)

 

[MeeBee]

Just to further confuse everyone Here are a few tweets from the first evidentiary hearing. Neumeister being questioned:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial • 3s 3 seconds ago
Juan asking BN about 2 trips to Mesa PD.
BN inspected TA's drive.
1st visit took photo of hard drive, 2nd cloned. #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer • 1m1 minute ago
Neumeister: "You guys have the original, I'm just taking a picture of it."

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial • 3s 4 seconds ago
Juan wants to confirm that BN provided him an image of the very first image he took of TA's drive. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial • 24s 24 seconds ago
Juan requests that the Judge require him to turn it over.
Judge says yes.
BN says it's encrypted so he won't be able to open it. #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer • 4m4 minutes ago
Stephens says Willmott can return to redirect examination. Martinez reiterates that he wants unencrypted image. Fragments of conversation.

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts • 3m3 minutes ago
Neumeister asks if he heard Martinez say correctly that Dworkin's copy was created in 2008. Wilmott says yes. #JodiArias

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts • 3m3 minutes ago
Neumeister asks why all the files on it say they were created in 2009? Wilmott: good question. #JodiArias

So is the reason that the files say they were created in 2009 because that's when LD made his copy off the original clone?

 

[Nosey Parker]

The YouPorn website could be one which is inviting personally created contributions. I am not about to pursue this by accessing it. Just a possibility because of a suspicious name. Like potboiler, I want to know the date this site was hit, for the same reason. What might Arias have contributed?

OMG I had better go back to my vacuuming. I just read your post as ' ... because of a suspicious name like potboiler' LOL

 

[Hope4More]

Last tidbit ....if I understand correctly, only HD #4 shows massive number of files modified on October 22, 11:32 pm. Over 9k files.

Bk doesn't offer any opinions of this AM's testimony

 

[MeeBee]

The YouPorn website could be one which is inviting personally created contributions. I am not about to pursue this by accessing it. Just a possibility because of a suspicious name. Like potboiler, I want to know the date this site was hit, for the same reason. What might Arias have contributed?

It's just a video tube, like YouTube.

 

[MeeBee]

OMG I had better go back to my vacuuming. I just read your post as ' ... because of a suspicious name like potboiler' LOL

So did I! lol!

 

[Shadowboy]

Another aside here: If there was ONE actual search and it was for YouPorn, when did that search take place? That site is kinda the YouTube of (according to my search results ... done incognito :blushing: and I didn't visit the site). I'm just wondering if that entire May 26th blow up might have been over the mysterious "Steve" (or whoever it was that JA claimed had access to her computer/Google accounts) finding and posting intimate photos of TA on this site? That would certainly explain TA's grief and anger.

 

[MeeBee]

Last tidbit ....if I understand correctly, only HD #4 shows massive number of files modified on October 22, 11:32 pm. Over 9k files.

Bk doesn't offer any opinions of this AM's testimony

The date they decided to frame the prosecutor, maybe?

 

[Nosey Parker]

So did I! lol!

Poor potboiler. Now he/she has been dragged into the issue.

 

[wenwe4]

Wasn't today specifically set aside for the upcoming witness (who wasn't available for 3 days)? The DT better bring on the PROOF of prosecutorial misconduct and child today (MOO).

If not toss it out, move on with trial and put the actual proof of "mitigating factors" on.

 

[04009margaret]

Thanks MeeBee.
This is what disturbs me.

It would have been in the field he's qualified in though, which is audio & video.