Travis was dead just over a week after this exchange. CMJA had to drive over 1,000 miles to kill him.
Dr. F characterized it as a rant, yet the person ranting ended up slaughtered and the doc blithely repeats that Arias didn't know what the argument was all about. Yet she is able to go merrily on her way to visit him and somehow he is the one who ends up dead. But Travis
was ranting.
Makes no sense at all. We all know this. Everyone wants to know what happened to set off that argument. Including this new jury.
I just hope that nothing Dr. F said on the stand sticks with this jury. The two things I am most concerned about are the inferences to child




/pedophilia and the repeated use of the phrase "master manipulator".