I can't post his name but there is a twitterer who seems to know who this could be. He has the screen shots of the weirdness this person claims, including that he was a friend of Travis and confronted Travis over pictures he found of children in sexual poses, among other things. Guys, it's BS and if he's called he will be promptly dismantled. This man did not know Travis.
I cant believe the anger I still have inside concerning this one defendant but when I read such nonsense as this it boils to the top again.
To know Travis' character will once again be slaughtered just like she slaughtered his body makes me truly ill.
If this is allowed by JS I will go ballistic. No one should be able to come in and say such despicable things unless they have something concrete to support it. And of course there will be no photos or videos showing this to be true. Just another 'he said.'
Why is this even being allowed? What does this have to do with Arias slaughtering Travis? Even she said what happened that day was to do with her dropping his camera.
It is so wrong on every level. It shows the deceased victim is just as vulnerable to character assignation in death as they were when viscously murdered based only on words and nothing more.
If he really did any of these things there would have been evidence on his computer or in his home and there is nothing. Travis had no clue he was a dead man walking when he told Arias 'no more' yet not one thing to do with little children posed in a sexual manner was ever found on his computer or in his home. But Arias wanted the last jury to believe that he casually had photos scattered about on his bed for anyone to see. Ugggh that is beyond ridiculous.
To know all of this sickening vile carp is coming once again disturbs me greatly making me realize just how hard it is going to be for me to stomach what is going to be said about this young man.
HOW is this a mitigating factor? Is she simply wanting the jury to believe that Travis was a pedophile (without evidence) and for that he deserved to be slaughtered?
I have never seen a trial like this and I hope to never see one again. Mitigating factors to the DT seems to be retrying the guilt phase. How is that possible? What other defendant does that or DT?
So this will not be about what SHE did when she drove 1000 miles to slaughter Travis for daring to reject her. This is going to be nothing but another round of trashing Travis once again. She will not let this poor man rest in peace even in death which she caused.
She is so wicked and pure evil that she must destroy him in every conceivable way crushing him into the ground even further. Since this is the penalty phase she shouldn't be allowed to do this.
So now all of a sudden 6 years later this guy pops up?
Gah, I hope Juan rips him a new one.
