Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 21

[MarVa]

Since the site that was supposedly clicked on was youporn.com, I wonder if Jodi had posted a video on that site that involved either her alone or her and Travis together. Maybe she had threatened to post something there or maybe he was just checking to see if he could find her cyber footprints on the site.

But ultimately it doesn't matter because almost every male looks at .

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

Marking my spot . Morning all today will we hear the truth?

 

[Hatfield]

Actually, we do know what the website was, as it was tweeted.

And it is a site. State didn't dispute it -- at least if they did it wasn't tweeted to my knowledge.

But I agree.

= Canard, red herring, and convenient straw man for LKN as that's his practice specialty

Thanks and sorry, I didnt realize we knew name of the link.

 

[memoriesbymichelle]

And even if the website was manually clicked to go view it, that alone could have been a mistake click. LOL

Who knows what the title of the website link was. It may have been disguised as something else and was not obvious to the user that it was a site.

The whole thing is such a distraction.
Until the DT shows images themselves saved onto the computer on the original clone copy then I personally will choose to believe it was related to the virus links.

And even if images are finally shown that in itself still doesnt convince me that Travis put it there since other people had access to his machine. Namely his roomates and even Jodi after she killed him.

The DT would have to show when image date was saved and prove it was before she arrived that day. Then it would come down to whether a roomate could have done it or Travis.

Its all so distracting at this point and if anything should be part of appeal case of original verdict. Its being used as a delay tactic by DT at this point, hoping juror numbers will deplete.

And even if ALL of that were true what difference does it make? Does it make his heinous murder look "better"? I don't understand WHY this is even an issue before this court. It should be an appeals issue if they think it would have changed the verdict. I do not think it would change the verdict because of the violent nature and over the top "ness" of his murder.

 

[Truth Detector]

And even if the website was manually clicked to go view it, that alone could have been a mistake click. LOL

Who knows what the title of the website link was. It may have been disguised as something else and was not obvious to the user that it was a site.

The whole thing is such a distraction.
Until the DT shows images themselves saved onto the computer on the original clone copy then I personally will choose to believe it was related to the virus links.

And even if images are finally shown that in itself still doesnt convince me that Travis put it there since other people had access to his machine. Namely his roomates and even Jodi after she killed him.

The DT would have to show when image date was saved and prove it was before she arrived that day. Then it would come down to whether a roomate could have done it or Travis.

Its all so distracting at this point and if anything should be part of appeal case of original verdict. Its being used as a delay tactic by DT at this point, hoping juror numbers will deplete.

BBM

And that it wasn't done by someone remotely connected to his computer.

Yes, remote connection software existed prior to 2007.

Without a technically savvy eyewitness these things can never be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, only assumed.

 

[MarVa]

I think, human nature being what it is, that it is statistically impossible that none of the jurors have peeked on the internet to get more information, especially with the trial being handled in such a bizarre manner.

At the very least, the people they live with are surely following the trial and can't resist letting some things slip. Like maybe, "I won't tell you anything I saw today on the internet but you'll regret it later if you don't vote for the death penalty."

 

[wing560]

Don't forget that she was talking to them, which she did not have to do. She could have "lawyered up" immediately and not said a word.

 

[Truth Detector]

Thanks and sorry, I didnt realize we knew name of the link.

I am loath to repeat it.

But since according to azcentral everyone here is a sordid scandal junkie, why not?

 

[Nosey Parker]

:seeya: Going to miss a good chunk of today in real time - if there is a chunk of anything at all today. I have to go blanket my horse. It's going to be -32c tonight and tomorrow. That's too much, even with his thick Canadian winter coat. Catch you later, and have fun!

 

[Hope4More]

Please pardon the one-letter correction...

Oh my. Forgive me please, sir, as I knew not my error.

 

[wenwe4]

Good Morning all! I checked in over the weekend but didn't read through the thread. Did they ever release video of the hearing last week (like they promised to do that day)?

 

[Truth Detector]

Don't forget that she was talking to them, which she did not have to do. She could have "lawyered up" immediately and not said a word.

Ah, but she was still self-convinced that she could get away with it.

To that end, it was also important to her to know what LE knew.

So she prioritized lying and appearing to cooperate over clamming up.

Just call me Captain Obvious.

 

[bsk]

Since the site that was supposedly clicked on was youporn.com, I wonder if Jodi had posted a video on that site that involved either her alone or her and Travis together. Maybe she had threatened to post something there or maybe he was just checking to see if he could find her cyber footprints on the site.

But ultimately it doesn't matter because almost every male looks at .

Who knows what it was like in 2008, but I believe someone has said it involved Alexa. The real Alexa site is mainstream - it has been linked by the Drudge Report for years. There could be Alexa sites that have a very similar name, or as we've seen in the past they take advantage of using .com instead of .net and so on.

 

[04009margaret]

http://www.examiner.com/article/jod...-desperate-for-mitigation-witnesses-and-money

"What we have yet to see from the defense is any one person taking accountability for the fact that Travis Alexander was stabbed over 25 times, shot in the head, and nearly decapitated. The defense certainly does have a record for blaming everyone for their problems. Specifically this is a pattern of Jodi Arias that seems to have been present almost all of her life based on testimony from expert psychiatric witnesses at this trial."

"We know that Jodi Arias is in jail, and we know that she is very limited on what she can create art with. She is even limited on what she can write letters on. Where is she getting oil paints and canvases?'

 

[Truth Detector]

Oh my. Forgive me please, sir, as I knew not my error.

Granted forthwith; the opposite of what JSKS should do with JA's motions this a.m.

 

[Foghorn]

Good morning!

I thought I was late ( the Newfoundland rolled in mud, wasn't planning on bathing a dog this morning, sigh) but it looks like I have not missed much - no transcripts or motions decided upon, I see.:waiting:

Thanks to all the tweeters today! :tyou:

 

[Truth Detector]

Who knows what it was like in 2008, but I believe someone has said it involved Alexa. The real Alexa site is mainstream - it has been linked by the Drudge Report for years. There could be Alexa sites that have a very similar name, or as we've seen in the past they take advantage of using .com instead of .net and so on.

I believe it probably was the Amazon-owned/operated Alexa website.

The particular site disclosed in tweeted testimony was likely popular enough to be listed on that particular website ranking page.

Prosecution had incorrectly referred to it as "Alexia".

The context had to do with the "Top Sites" page on the website: http://www.alexa.com/topsites

Using their rankings, that particular site still ranks in the Top 500 pages both globally and in the USA.

 

[Hope4More]

Ah, but she was still self-convinced that she could get away with it.

To that end, it was also important to her to know what LE knew.

So she prioritized lying and appearing to cooperate over clamming up.

Just call me Captain Obvious.

Yep, but her arrogance that she could pull it off bit her in the derrière. In addition to capturing her lies on videotape, at the end Flores was able to provide JM an excellent preview of how the defendant might handle herself on the stand, and many fine insights into her psychological makeup. Advantage: JM.

 

[pinkandgreenmom]

Good morning!

I thought I was late ( the Newfoundland rolled in mud, wasn't planning on bathing a dog this morning, sigh) but it looks like I have not missed much - no transcripts or motions decided upon, I see.:waiting:

Thanks to all the tweeters today! :tyou:

Doesn't that always happen at the worst time?

 

[Hope4More]

Granted forthwith; the opposite of what JSKS should do with JA's motions this a.m.

Thank you, fine sordid-sir. I feel now that my mitigation is fully actualized.