- Joined
- Nov 29, 2012
- Messages
- 5,393
- Reaction score
- 59,807
What does any of this have to do with DP vs LWOP?
Well... er... nothin' at all.
Why do you ask?
This is JA's show, and all the jurors and judge are merely players.
What does any of this have to do with DP vs LWOP?
Several WSer's have commented on the lack of child porn.
This is true, of course, but Team Trash Travis have re-defined their definition of child porn to include "teen porn".
On January 8, she/they made it overt on the especially cruel lying torture murderess's Twitter page:
View attachment 67495
Doesn't make sense. Those cities are all in Southern California, this guy is from San Jose- Northern California.Here are the cities for California's 909 area code in case anyone is interested...
"Major Cities in Area Code 909
Chino, CA
Chino Hills, CA
Claremont, CA
Colton, CA
Diamond Bar, CA
Fontana, CA
Highland, CA
La Verne, CA
Montclair, CA
Ontario, CA
Pomona, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Redlands, CA
Rialto, CA
San Bernardino, CA
San Dimas, CA
Upland, CA
Yucaipa, CA"
link http://www.allareacodes.com/909
What?
The prosecution is on trial now, and the jury is going to make that decision?
When did that happen?
I don't understand why this is in front of the jury in the first place.
Yes, the judge has made this about Travis being on trial and the prosecutor being on trial. Shameful.
They think the DP will be removed due to prosecutorial misconduct and that she will be freed today.I am wondering what Nurmi's next strategy will be to delay trial or make demands that no other court would even consider (let alone allow).
Bets on him having no other witnesses who are willing to testify (if not in secret) on Jodi's behalf?
I wonder if the witnesses are trying to show some sort of solidarity for Jodi wanting to testify in secret or if this was just a DT ploy that was announced up front to the potential witnesses?
Well... er... nothin' at all.
Why do you ask?
This is JA's show, and all the jurors and judge are merely players.
Is Sue finished testifying??? Thanks
What does any of this have to do with DP vs LWOP?
A sample of clients using Encase software:
https://www.guidancesoftware.com/about/Pages/our-customers.aspx?cmpid=nav#
US Department of Homeland Security
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
US Census Bureau
US Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA)
US Department of Commerce
US Department of Energy
US Department of Health and Human Services
US Department of Justice
US Department of State
US Forest Service
US Treasury Department
CIA
NATO
NASA
Exxon Mobil
Chevron
Apple Inc.
GM Financial
Ford Motor Company
IBM
Boeing
Microsoft
Walgreen
Comcast Cable
Cisco
Oracle
Dell
SanDisk
Ebay
Yahoo
Honeywell
Symantec
Motorola
Lowes
Intuit
McAfee
Sony
Calgary Police Services
Canadian Police College Ottawa
Clayton MO Police Department
Korean National Police Agency
London Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
New South Wales Police Force
Norwegian Police University College
Police Academy of the Netherlands
Police and Crime Commissioner for Avon and Somerset
Police College of Finland
But according to Nurmi, Encase software is grade school.
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 36s 37 seconds ago
Smith says a lot of law enforcement agencies including Homeland Security and U. Michigan labs use Autopsy. Nurmi says EnCase is grade school

Why does the defense keep putting guys from high school AV clubs on the stand?
I have no problem with his lack of credentials, I've hired many a developer without them and in a lot of ways they out performed my staff with advanced degrees. They don't get stuck in theory, they solve problems, the joy of discovery if you will. This however is not the reason for my post. The witness said that he prefers autopsy because he can view the source code to verify it. Folks if he can view it he can alter it, which is why a lot of major corporations and government agencies shy away from open source. I would find it hard to believe (I could be very wrong) that any one would guarantee the results of a product that can be altered on a whim.
I would just change one teeny word in your sentence- pawns not players.
I have no problem with his lack of credentials, I've hired many a developer without them and in a lot of ways they out performed my staff with advanced degrees. They don't get stuck in theory, they solve problems, the joy of discovery if you will. This however is not the reason for my post. The witness said that he prefers autopsy because he can view the source code to verify it. Folks if he can view it he can alter it, which is why a lot of major corporations and government agencies shy away from open source. I would find it hard to believe (I could be very wrong) that any one would guarantee the results of a product that can be altered on a whim.
I distinctively remember one of the tweeters commenting for sure that he looked Amish.