- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,335
- Reaction score
- 42,778
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 10s 10 seconds ago
Martinez just named the affidavit witness again. Willmott objects. Sidebar.
Then he's doing this deliberately!
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 10s 10 seconds ago
Martinez just named the affidavit witness again. Willmott objects. Sidebar.
Ok...how do you go from January 2001 to December 2001. That's quite a gap.
Yup! No pseudonyms or paper bags needed, only barf bags.Surely, the name would be common knowledge just from the sequence of events and particulars, anyway? Like, no one would figure this out?
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 10s 10 seconds ago
Martinez just named the affidavit witness again. Willmott objects. Sidebar.
Then he's doing this deliberately!
McGee is the secret Witness #1Is McGee the convicted JA's boyfriend?
BK did...
Haha. He is doing it on purpose. Just like he asked John Smith for his name and online name.Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 10s 10 seconds ago
Martinez just named the affidavit witness again. Willmott objects. Sidebar.
I thought the 'clarification' letter from 4 days ago said it happened in Dec 2001?
michael kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 8s 8 seconds ago
martinez immediately uses the name again in the first half of his question after sidebar, then stops, throws up his hands and says "crap!"
Juan Martinez does not make 'mistakes'. If he is 'accidentally' naming this witness there is a reason. IF they go for a mistrial over this Juan can bring up the fact that this witness identity never 'needed' to be hidden for 'protection' nor from 'online bullying'. He can very well show that this witness is all over the internet telling these tales and it is this witness threatening people. Bring it on Nurmi and Wilmott- you are both stupid enough to try this.