- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 1,973
- Reaction score
- 21,101
Anyone know if Ziggy is going to court today? I can't remember if she said she would be there.
Yeah when her phone was dying yesterday, she said that she would bring her charger today.
Anyone know if Ziggy is going to court today? I can't remember if she said she would be there.
Anyone know if Ziggy is going to court today? I can't remember if she said she would be there.
If I were a juror this is something, right or wrong as per jury instructions, that would give me great pause. I couldn't help but wonder why no family members have come to speak on her behalf (although I could see how some could think her parents refused b/c they were pissed either that she told on them or lied about them), and why those that have elected to do so gave an affadavit rather than come in person.
I am hoping that the judicial system will be changed.....hired guns, jury consultants and defense attorneys who are able to step on the constitution have ruined the system. It is not working like it was intended. I would like to see death penalty trials held under a severe scrutiny.. This trial is a travesty along with several others in the past few years. Many people are making huge amounts of money on these trials but justice is not always served....IMO
You know bsk, I think sometimes jurors don't make the hard decision of sentencing someone to death because they know that the DP system in most states is flooded with appeals, expanded rights for the accused, and anti-DP advocates that it is unlikely the person will ever be put to death anyway. Of course, except in Texas.
AZL...if you pop in today...
Are these options for JA on the stand accurate?
1. She can take the stand again to testify. If she does so, her secret testimony also becomes subject to cross examination.
2. She can decline to testify on the stand again. JSS has the option of either striking her secret testimony or allowing it in as allocution.
3. If the secret testimony is allowed in as allocution, JM will not be able to cross on it.
4. If allowed in as allocution, JA can choose whether or not to continue allocuting on the stand without cross by JM.
5. If she continues with allocution, she can say whatever she wants for as long as she wants? What happens if she goes flat out for residual doubt? As in denies she premeditated the murder?
Another question for AZL. Geff managed to slip in that MM saw her bruised and told her to get a restraining order. I'm assuming he's basing that on what JA told him, not on affadavit testimony. You've said that JM can cast doubt on affadavit testimony by asking the jury to consider why those folks didn't testify in court.
What options does he have to challenge JA's assertions about MM if she doesn't repeat this lie in testimony or allocution?
So if we only have CMJA word on it, how do we know that she and TA actually had anal sex or any of the proclivities she testified to? I am now wondering if she sought to paint a picture of sodomy to perpetuate her pedophile story. Anyone else?
I'd like to see trials of this caliber judged by judges, not by everyday people.
All it takes is another William Zervakos who said in interviews that Jodi Arias was a perfectly normal 27 yo woman living a perfectly normal life until she met Travis Alexander and her life spiraled downhill. I hope her July 28 letter shows this jury that, even if JA is mentally ill, she poses too much of a danger to other inmates to be allowed to live among them.
So if we only have CMJA word on it, how do we know that she and TA actually had anal sex or any of the proclivities she testified to? I am now wondering if she sought to paint a picture of sodomy to perpetuate her pedophile story. Anyone else?
You know bsk, I think sometimes jurors don't make the hard decision of sentencing someone to death because they know that the DP system in most states is sooo flooded with appeals, expanded rights for the accused, and anti-DP advocates that it is unlikely the person will ever be put to death anyway. Of course, except in Texas.
So if we only have CMJA word on it, how do we know that she and TA actually had anal sex or any of the proclivities she testified to? I am now wondering if she sought to paint a picture of sodomy to perpetuate her pedophile story. Anyone else?
I wouldn't be surprised if Bianca got a restraining order against JA, or MM told JA Bianca would if she ever confronted her again.
I'd like to see trials of this caliber judged by judges, not by everyday people.
BBM. Not true in California. I know for a fact. We got a Temporary Restraining Order against my neighbor directly across the street from us who was schizophrenic and making threats and acting crazy.The problem with that is, I believe, that in most states you can only get a restraining order against an intimate partner. In some states, you could maybe get a stalking order.... In my state, it takes a lot of convincing to persuade a judge to issue a stalking order, plus the aggressor has to have threatened to hurt the victim. My landlord has been stalking me: this is how I know.
I'm in the minority on this but I don't think she will testify again. I hope for sanity's sake that the Defense rests today.
Ok...who is Bianca?