Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 34

[dog.gone.cute]

From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 21s 21 seconds ago


For some reason documents on screen are under the name settings/Deanna Reid. #jodiarias

 

[josie1986]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 1m 1 minute ago
Travis didn't deserve to be murdered over checking out hub and going on dating websites....the jury looks bored. #jodiarias

yep,we've all said it all long

 

[geevee]

He was also accused of prosecutorial misconduct. I am sure he wants to disprove that accusation. jmo

Didn't JSS already rule on those motions in the big filing with about 23 rulings on all the defense motions plus 2 of JM's? Maybe my memory is lacking but I thought that part of it was decided.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

From SK:

Steve Krafft ‏@SKrafftFox10 · 25s25 seconds ago


For those keeping score at home, we are up to 6 sidebars so far. #jodiarias

 

[MissHaley]

Ya Jen just keep pounding it home Travis was not a Pedo and just a healthy ole male.

Well, yeah- how about that? They're showing he likes adult women!!!!!!!!!!! But then also saying he likes 12 yo girls, along with 6 yo boys! WTH? What a shame this is. :liar:

 

[geevee]

Steve Krafft ‏@SKrafftFox10 · 1m1 minute ago
For those keeping score at home, we are up to 6 sidebars so far. #jodiarias

 

[My-Future-Ex-Husband]

BBM - Full disclosure, uporn would have been a popup ad on Alexis iirc.:
"09:24
On June 1, 2008, what did you find?
At 03:44 hours (AZ time) user is on the site Alexa. A 03:45, uporn.com was clicked on. User was on from 03:45 to 04:36 hours.
6,435 records were found in that database. Out of that, there were 166 records associated with the uporn website."

Sounds like he was paging through the site to me. I think there's about 25 vids per page (I looked it up when they first mentioned it so youse don't have to).

 

[Truth Detector]

So it seems that with such small amount of nude photos that these could have easily come to Travis thru emails. Emails from one of his friends who had their email account hacked which then sent virus or to every one of their contacts. With a nice little message allegedly from their friend saying "You have got to see this! Hilarious"

Certainly possible; however, I still believe the seminal (ahem) points are:

1. There is no proof of child as alleged by the especially cruel murderess,
2. No one can prove who downloaded/viewed (or didn't) anything on the victim's laptop while he was alive -- ever, and most importantly,
3. None of it is mitigating in any way, shape, or form.

I thought this phase of the trial was supposed to be the especially cruel guilty murderer offering evidence to support her mitigation claims.

Instead, by highlighting her cruelty, she's affirming the previous jury's guilt findings.

 

[Kamille]

I wonder if Det. Smith even needs to testify now? The defense has nothing with this carp.

I'm curious as to what he has to say if Det Brown is dealing with the , or rather lack of it. Just what else did Det. Smith discover?

:thinking:

 

[TorisMom003]

Well if the website wasn't Kiddiefriendfinder and contain or be a website for pedophiles to "share" with one another, what difference does it really make?

Travis and JA were not married, were not engaged, were not living together. Travis was a single male who was free to date, have sex with, as many women as he wanted to.

MOO

 

[Bravo]

Seriously, now a single man isn't even allowed to visit dating sites because of a cray cray ex friend with benefits? What happened to the child allegations JW?

I'm assuming since the child became moot. Jodi instructed her Team to just go with and dating sites. Lordy!

 

[zoey]

From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 39s 39 seconds ago


Jury all stare at screen.

2 taking notes re: dates & times TA visited dating sites. #jodiarias


:gaah: Travis IS NOT on trial here :gaah:

Really????? What trial are you watching/reading???? You may be thinking he is the murderer victim, BUT you would be wrong~~CMJA is the one and only victim. Remember TA has the " " on his computer~~
this trial annoys me CMJA isn't as pure and innocent they are trying to present.

 

[NotMyselfNEMore]

Can he tell you who or what downloaded them?

Can he tell you if anyone viewed them?

Well, he can tell someone viewed something that had an ad that had a picture, but I don't think anyone downloaded anything she's babbling about. And no one can tell who used this computer - really for anything - unless they want to say it was all Deanna Reid, who registered it-
The whole line of questions is ridiculous, IMO.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

And to rehabilitate his witness JM should put JA's orifices back on the screen and ask is this ?

Yep ... put 'em all up there ... show this jury what kind of person JA really is !

 

[MissHaley]

I know it's not gonna happen, and that's ok, but wouldn't it be great if JM is letting JW hang herself, gets up on redirect and can prove JA is responsible for the May 27 attack and the popups?

I would LOVE that sooooo much!!!! It would help with my disgust.

 

[Hope4More]

From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 21s 21 seconds ago


For some reason documents on screen are under the name settings/Deanna Reid. #jodiarias

Aaaaaargh! We know why. But nobody thought to blank out her name? So now she's to be strung up for " " too?

 

[Mindmatters]

What??? After the bungholio pics and all? You know JM is going to get up there and show the whole pic. LOL

What a clever, clever girl JW is--employing the psychology of unstated messaging and power of suggestion, i.e., these pictures that the depraved TA was viewing are just so very offensive that we aren't willing to show you it. After all they only have to hoodwink one juror.

 

[geevee]

I'm assuming since the child became moot. Jodi instructed her Team to just go with and dating sites. Lordy!

Anything to smudge his character. Great big Fail, defense.

 

[Kamille]

So let's see......Match. com was bad because Travis was a married man at the time and he was planning on stepping out with a mistress. Wait, that isn't correct. Ok, how about this.......Match. com was bad because Travis was in a committed relationship at the time and he was planning on stepping out with another woman. Wait, that isn't correct either. Hmmmm. Ok here we go.......Match. com is a NON issue because Travis was a single man looking for a wife and had no serious relationships with any other women at the time. Yep, I think I finally got it right on that last one.

MOO

Or maybe the problem was that he didn't use Christian Mingle? :dunno:

 

[Val1]

Hmm where's this report from? Hopefully not one of BN's.