Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 6- Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
I truly don't trust MK. All along he has not acted professionally in the entire case nor does he have a clue that reporters are to remain bias free. I do think he has KNs number on speed dial.

Even the tweets he has done from inside the courtroom this time have a passive/aggressive tone to them.

He has let his biases be shown throughout. I cant believe the owner of the newspaper hasn't called him out on it but maybe they are dripping with biases too.

I really try to ignore his tweets since he always seems to get a dig in during most of them.

I think he would like nothing better than to see this end in a mistrial. I really wouldn't put anything past him, Katie. He has been way too involved in this case on a personal level imo. His hatred for Juan has clouded his judgment and his attraction to JA is obvious.

We read all the other tweets from those who are inside the courtroom and they tweet pretty much the same things as they all are tweeting but then MK is the one that comes out of left field and will tweet an off the wall tweet.

I agree with everything you've said. I don't read him either in fact he had me blocked on twitter for a long time. He shows up rarely because, frankly, he doesn't tweet that much considering he's the reporter for the local paper covering "the courts". His tweets are biased, passive aggressive as you say and infrequent. They hold no credibility for me anyway. But that @justice4jodiann sure likes to retweet them.
 
Yep, the "new beau" was reported to be in the courtroom ... :waitasec: sure wish we could have seen a photo ... :gaah:

Anyway ... I think her "new beau" is zervokas ... seriously ... lol !

:moo:

Nothing in this case would surprise me anymore. I've long given up hope of watching the verdict in real time. Let's hope we can at least know what the verdict is. I can picture Arias throwing a tantrum and demanding that the verdict be sealed till the 'haters stop hating'. :what: I'm only half kidding.
 
I've been following with interest a particular tweeter who goes under the handle @justice4jodiann

He/she posts courtroom observations like they are factual but opposing the majority of the other verified tweeters in there. Observations on the Alexanders (always caustic) and the jury (always like they are for Jodi) and the players (highly against Juan Martinez).

What has interested me about this poster is that it appears, to me, that they are in the courtroom daily.

This means one of 3 things:

1. They are part of the media but flying under the radar and not identifying themself.

2. They are part of Jodi's family or friends (who are very limited in there).

3. They are courtroom staff.

KCL, the twitter handle you mention belongs to a few people (primarily one) who has a supporter website, trying to rake in cash. There is a corresponding FB page. I don't believe that the person who mistakenly posted in public on the JAII (who pretends to be or is in the courtroom) is the same person.
 
That part of the post says to me the tweeter is full of it.

Hope I have bounced back and forth on this tweeter all week, first thinking that too. I've delved a little deeper today and now I land on them being in there.
 
It's also funny to me that j4ja keeps assuring you they're not affiliated with jaii even though the name on the post in question is Justusforall. It also has nothing to do with your question. Protesting too much?
 
I agree with everything you've said. I don't read him either in fact he had me blocked on twitter for a long time. He shows up rarely because, frankly, he doesn't tweet that much considering he's the reporter for the local paper covering "the courts". His tweets are biased, passive aggressive as you say and infrequent. They hold no credibility for me anyway. But that @justice4jodiann sure likes to retweet them.

He blocked me for a while too lol.
 
KCL, the twitter handle you mention belongs to a few people (primarily one) who has a supporter website, trying to rake in cash. There is a corresponding FB page. I don't believe that the person who mistakenly posted in public on the JAII (who pretends to be or is in the courtroom) is the same person.

Then their style of posting is identical and they both claim to be in the courtroom. I don't believe there are TWO Jodi Arias supporters in that courtroom daily flying under the radar. I just find that very hard to believe.
 
*IF* the mystery witness is JA and she is giving/has given her allocution, is that a sign this whole circus is quickly nearing an end? TIA

[Please say yes, please say yes, please say yes!]
 
It's also funny to me that j4ja keeps assuring you they're not affiliated with jaii even though the name on the post in question is Justusforall. It also has nothing to do with your question. Protesting too much?

dingdingding
 
*IF* the mystery witness is JA and she is giving/has given her allocution, is that a sign this whole circus is quickly nearing an end? TIA

[Please say yes, please say yes, please say yes!]

I want to kiss your face for even suggesting that.
 
Why did JA's mother leave the courtroom yesterday, ahead of this so-called mystery witness?
 
It could be. But they are definitely trying to make it appear as if they are inside. And I, having been kind of monitoring this account coupled with the screenshot, have formed an opinion that they are in there.

I had blocked all JA supporters on twitter, I just can't stand all the hate that they are spewing, but will now unblock them and will try and monitor those tweets, it surely seems suspicious.
 
I've never been to any of those sites and not sure how this screen shot even got out. I just saw it this am on twitter and thought "well there she is" (@justice4jodiann) who I've always thought was a she just by posting style. I'm gender neutral now.

I DO know exactly how it got out, who put it out there and why. There are folks who are very involved in keeping tabs on the pro-CMJA folks. Monitoring them, if you will. They've been tracking this J person for a long time. This person is NUTS. Seriously not OK in addition to being appallingly cruel.
And again, none of these folks believe J is in the courtroom.

The claim about her testifying yesterday was MOCKED.
 
KCL, I looked at the tweets of this tweeter on twitter (say that five times fast). The tweeter slams Juan Martinez and the Alexander family constantly. Why on earth would this tweeter have a problem with the Alexanders? And Travis himself? What have they done? I kinda understand the slams against Juan as there are slams against the DT posted here all the time.

is this kind of a *thing* with the Jodi supporters? I didn't do twitter much during the trial nor see much of that activity (being either in the courtroom or posting here). So I really don't know but I do know Kiefer and this tweeter share those sentiments.
 
I DO know exactly how it got out, who put it out there and why. There are folks who are very involved in keeping tabs on the pro-CMJA folks. Monitoring them, if you will. They've been tracking this J person for a long time. This person is NUTS. Seriously not OK in addition to being appallingly cruel.
And again, none of these folks believe J is in the courtroom.

The claim about her testifying yesterday was MOCKED.

I may be late to this party but I'm gonna keep questioning these rats as their ship sinks. This one wanted that hidden immediately. I wanna know why.
 
Terribly off topic.....did sidebars ever get released from Casey's trial??? I wish states would be consistent in their rules.
 
I had blocked all JA supporters on twitter, I just can't stand all the hate that they are spewing, but will now unblock them and will try and monitor those tweets, it surely seems suspicious.


:seeya: Great idea !

" ... keep your friends close and your enemies closer ..."

:waitasec: KWIM ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
223
Guests online
483
Total visitors
706

Forum statistics

Threads
625,759
Messages
18,509,445
Members
240,839
Latest member
Mrs.KatSmiff
Back
Top