Posted this on the wrong thread because the initial post I'm responding to was there, but it belongs here, so......
Quote:
Originally Posted by
texasmommy39
It has also been reported that Ron and his employer PDM where in agreement that Ron would return to work on the April 6th and was notified the 3rd that he had been terminated for failure to keep in touch with PDM. I am sure that some would feel this was inappropriate behavior for an employer of PDM under normal circumstances, but, would anyone of us had the mindset to worry about a job that you where under the impression was being held and not be focus and consumed with the fact your child had been abducted from her bed in the middle of the night?
PDM's Statement to Orlando Sentinel
"Tony McCauley, director of human resources for PDM Bridge, said Cummings' bosses never heard from him following Haleigh's disappearance Feb. 10.
McCauley said Cummings could have asked for a leave of absence.
"That never happened," he said from company headquarters in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. "Without that happening, at some point they filled his position. He was released."
Cummings operated a rolling crane at the plant north of Palatka. He was not a longtime employee. "We still have a great deal of sympathy for Mr. Cummings and his family and certainly hope for the best," McCauley said."
He didn't contact them. Sure, they knew what was happening, but they have a business to run.
Ronald's attorney at the time's perspective
“Ronald agreed to this date and was prepared to go into work when he was told on Friday, April 3, 2009, that the offer to return to work was being withdrawn for ‘abandoning his job,’”
My THEORY, my OPINION, my GUESS is that the abandonment Mr. Kimball speaks of happened the night of Haleigh's disappearance, and he never went back. As we know, we have precedent for thinking that this THEORY has merit, since recently out of Ronald's own mouth, he states he's been waiting for LE to call him.