Ron C. #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
The difference here is that KP NEVER represented Marie at all, and she made it clear that her representation of Crystal was in regard to the custody issues. I have never seen a statement that she or Crystal made that implied that she was an intermediary between Crystal and LE for any reason.

ON THE OTHER HAND......Ron and his attorneys made it clear that their number ONE priority was that they represented him in his interactions with LE, as made clear in their publicly issued statement quoted above.

It is a legal issue and it is a clearly stated matter of representation on the part of both Ron and his attorneys. All posters here may not understand that this is how it works technically in this situation, but it is a fact. They stated that they represent him and WILL ASSIST in his interaction with LE. Therefore, they are obligated to do this, or WERE until they dismissed him as their client.
 
Everyone in the their "right mind", huh? Nice. :rolleyes:

Sorry, that's not how it works in real life. In real life - an attorney accompanies his or her client to the police station and is present while the client is being interviewed. If there is a question the attorney does not want the client to answer, the attorney stops the client from answering, or they confer briefly. An attorney does not stop a client from speaking to LE.

You are exactly right on this, and you have confirmed the point we have been trying to make. When LE directly states that they have had no contact with the law firm, then that obviously means that they have had no contact with Ron during that same time period. In order for them to accompany Ron and advise him during any interview, that necessitates that the law firm representative also would be "in contact" with LE.
 
I understand RC was not speaking to the media except thru the law firm. I do not believe talking to LE was an issue. IMO

What's the point of having an attorney if you don't take them with you when you talk to LE?
 
I might be missing it but where does it state that RC has not had contact with LE at all for 3 out of the 5 months?
iirc last statement from LE was late April or early May, and they said folks were coperating, and they have never said Misty lied iirc, actually iirc one of the last statements was that Misty was not the only one either who is being pulled back in for more questioning or who has inconsistencies, someone wll have the link it was discussed endlessly at that time
 
you are exactly right on this, and you have confirmed the point we have been trying to make. When le directly states that they have had no contact with the law firm, then that obviously means that they have had no contact with ron during that same time period. In order for them to accompany ron and advise him during any interview, that necessitates that the law firm representative also would be "in contact" with le.

b i n g o
 
iirc last statement from LE was late April or early May, and they said folks were coperating, and they have never said Misty lied iirc, actually iirc one of the last statements was that Misty was not the only one either who is being pulled back in for more questioning or who has inconsistencies, someone wll have the link it was discussed endlessly at that time

LOL....yeah there are links, many many video links that show the inconsistencies that LE is dealing with in many person's accounts. Go back through any of the earlier video links in this forum, you will find a multitude of inconsistencies besides Misty's: Ron's, TN's, GGS, Misty's mom, etc.
 
I guess we both were wrong about DCF publically releasing information regarding an investigation.

What I am talking about is what's in the report, that will never see the light of day. I have no problem with them saying they found no abuse in the house and the case is closed
 
I might be missing it but where does it state that RC has not had contact with LE at all for 3 out of the 5 months?

I guessed I missed it too. Just because the lawyers didn't talk to LE doesn't meant Ron has not talked to them.

I would assume Crystal talked to LE whether Kim talked to them or not.
 
I am sorry we will just have to agree to disagree - AH sources close to the investigation don't mean much to me at all. The last statement directly from LE stated that RC and Misty were cooperating.

I think AH has lost his source "close to the investigation". :D
 
I am wondering if this is all in the interpretation of what talking to LE means. If LE wants to question RC I am sure the attorney would be present. However, for RC to get a status of the investigation, to call and see if anything new is up or LE has a quick question for RC I don't see the presence of an attorney necessary. People are making it sound like RC has had no contact with LE for the last two months and I just don't believe that is the case.

If LE wanted to question RC then why were they not making repeated request to the attorney for this, if they haven't spoken to the attorney for two months then obviously they are not wanting to question RC.

What's the point of having an attorney if you don't take them with you when you talk to LE?
 
What I am talking about is what's in the report, that will never see the light of day. I have no problem with them saying they found no abuse in the house and the case is closed

Just a difference of opinion then. I consider the Conclusion and Recommendations (e.g. parenting classes) to be part of the Report.
 
Wow! It's like watching a tennis match in here.

Someone holds the key to where Haleigh is. I can't believe she has not been found.
 
Could it be that RC doesnt need assistance in those areas because he is cooperating with LE?

I believe that Ronald Cummings and his family to be very familiar with LE...that does not necessarily equate to cooperation in this particular case.
 
I stated an opinion. Not against TOS and I do not want to take the bait. I am sure you can think about it and get there yourself, you are very intelligent. :)
Yes thank you for stating that i was intelligent. imo and that why i feel that ron and misty are innocent and will stand behind them.
 
Snipped.

Ron believers?

I would think that Ron being cleared in this investigation should make EVERYONE happy! The fact that HaLeigh & Junior were not abused should be WONDERFUL news to each and every person that cares about these children, or children in general. What that has to do whether or not you think Ron has anything to do with HaLeigh's disappearance is beyond me. The kids were not abused - why can't people be happy about that? Do people really hate Ron that much they cannot be happy for the children? Is that what this case has boiled down to?
-----------
Fact is DCF couldn't find factual evidence to prove that Ron abused the children, it doesn't mean that they weren't abused, just that it could not be proven. I would think that everyone would want the truth to come out. Ron has managed to slide through this charge just like the other legal charges he slid through. BTW, OJ was found not guilty too, but that doesn't mean that he didn't do it, does it? There are lots of children living with abuse everyday where DCF cleared the parent through their investigation. There are also a lot of children who did not live through it.
 
-----------
Fact is DCF couldn't find factual evidence to prove that Ron abused the children, it doesn't mean that they weren't abused, just that it could not be proven. I would think that everyone would want the truth to come out. Ron has managed to slide through this charge just like the other legal charges he slid through. BTW, OJ was found not guilty too, but that doesn't mean that he didn't do it, does it? There are lots of children living with abuse everyday where DCF cleared the parent through their investigation. There are also a lot of children who did not live through it.

Yes and it is extremely insulting to those who did live through and are living through just such an experience to negate the fact that it happens.
 
I understand that I have not seen anything stating that RC has not spoken to LE.


Thursday, Sheriff's Office spokesman Johnny Greenwood said detectives had not received any "credible information" from the law firm and had not had contact with them since April or early May

http://www.staugustine.com/stories/071709/news_1754651.shtml

If the law firm had no contact with them then that means Ron has not either, as they speak for him,or should I say did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
152
Guests online
1,216
Total visitors
1,368

Forum statistics

Threads
627,286
Messages
18,542,530
Members
241,244
Latest member
tayder_tot
Back
Top