Ronald has filed for divorce.

They have been granted a legal separation and either of them can seek a dissolution at any time.
 
per the earlier post "Why did RC go retrieve MC and bring her home to stay and watch his children when she had been gone on a 3 day binge as admitted by all involved"

How do you figure all involved? Who's the all? :confused:
 
How come not in Putnam County Atherella?

I'm confused and dont' know where to begin to figure it out LOL thanks in advance!

That makes two of us... what is a marriage settlement; something involving alimony?
 
That makes two of us... what is a marriage settlement; something involving alimony?
basically it's an agreement as to what properties belong to whom.
(personal belongings, vehicles, and any other properties one may own)
 
How come not in Putnam County Atherella?

I'm confused and dont' know where to begin to figure it out LOL thanks in advance!

Hi Kat,

Sorry I didn't see your post before. My green light is always on, but I'm not usually here on WS. :)

I'm not really sure why the divorce was filed in St. Johns County, to be honest. I know Ron's attorney is located in St. Augustine, which I believe is St. Johns County. Not really sure about the filing, to be honest. However, believe it or not, the divorce is FINAL, already! It became final yesterday (the 15th - for future reference).

finalh.jpg


If anyone wants to read the final divorce order (there isn't much to it since they had no debt, property, etc), you can do so here:

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/10/16/marital.settlement.agreement.pdf
 
Man, the s@#$#$$344tch did't even let her have any of the three cars. He is one selfish narcissist.....IMO

Looks like he got rid of her before the non-profit is established...can't have her hand in that pot. She may talk about it. There is the reason for his getting rid of her. He waited till her attorney was not around to get her to sign to. Gads, this guy knows how to work around his legal problems and win.....every time.
 
I posted the same thing on the RT Whisperer. He is a PO work ain't he. He couldn't even give her the 1995 car. He has the ability to work, collect child support, donations and a NPO. He doesn't pay for his kid to Amber but gets all he can from CS and anyone willing to pay up. He makes me sick.
 
Crystal should support her children. That's not about Ron; that's about what is due to the children. They not only need the financial support; they need to know that their parents are at least minimally providing for their basic needs. Why would it make you sick that Crystal was ordered to pay child support for her kids? Or that Ron can work? Or that people might donate to a non-profit to find Haleigh?

If it is or has been established that Ron has a child with another woman, she should go to court and he should pay up.

It's not up to Ron to "give" Misty a vehicle. The state determines the division of marital property unless the parties reach an agreement on their own. Up until the other day, we know that both parties had attorneys, although one report I saw said that Misty just read the papers and had them notorized. Certainly, at any point up until the time her attorney quit she could have had legal advice if she wanted to get some material item from Ronald. And frankly, we don't know which of these vehicles are operable. She would have had to be able to put plates on any vehicle and get her own insurance, as well, which would be quite expensive since she is under 18. My guess is that there wasn't much to divide up anyway.
 
For those who inquired. We now know the laws of Florida marriage/divorce priviledges between husband and wife. From link below provided by Angel Who Cares, Bless you.

Misty Cummings came under scrutiny early in the investigation after she changed her story about details leading up to Haleigh's disappearance. That scrutiny was renewed in recent weeks after she and her brother both were re-interviewed by investigators.
Florida law never prevented the couple from testifying against each other, even when they were married, former State Attorney Rod Smith said. He said there is no husband-wife privilege if the victim is a child of one of the parents.

Pick up Tuesday's Times-Union to read how the world of bloggers has become attached to the girl's disappearance and the families.


http://jacksonville.com/news/florida/2009-10-19/story/ronald_and_misty_cummings_divorce_goes_through
 
just for the record, I lived a good many years in a trailer so the t-trash comment wasn't meant to offend anyone. And apparently it did. Part of the reason I don't post often is because I get tired of having to post apologies and disclaimers a bunch of times before during and after comments. These are clearly stated opinions, of which we are all entitled to post. or so I understood.

no offense was meant .. again, I have personally lived in a trailer, worn camo print and jeans, the comment was attached to Misty only... and its my opinion of her.

my point was the abrupt CHANGE in her appearance, not a commentary on personal styles of rural Americans posting on WS or otherwise.

I follow the case because I am interested in Haleigh , not the people who surrounded her. Fair enough for you?

you are reading a tone to my post that wasn't there. sorry to have offended, and it certainly wasnt aimed at you .

This little girl is still missing and the people "who loved her so much" are still not offering the information needed to locate her. I am upset because Ron and Misty, the two in charge of her little person, are making money, appearing on all the flashy news shows and STILL NO CHILD, Misty gets new clothes, a stylist, a flight to NY again, another news show appearance, A wealthy mentor, a wedding, and a divorce, attorneys. Pretty good time for a 17 yr old kid who had LE running around chasing their tails and STILL wont give up what she knows. She can barely string two thoughts together and yet another exclusinve interview where she says nothing of value.

that's my point.

IMO apologies to anyone who is offended by me and my opinions, my posts and observations...yadda yadda and so on etc.

I am going to stick with reading only... then no one gives a crap or takes offense from what I think

i live in a trailer home im not offended.. im trailer park royalty hehe :)
 
For those who inquired. We now know the laws of Florida marriage/divorce priviledges between husband and wife. From link below provided by Angel Who Cares, Bless you.

Misty Cummings came under scrutiny early in the investigation after she changed her story about details leading up to Haleigh's disappearance. That scrutiny was renewed in recent weeks after she and her brother both were re-interviewed by investigators.
Florida law never prevented the couple from testifying against each other, even when they were married, former State Attorney Rod Smith said. He said there is no husband-wife privilege if the victim is a child of one of the parents.

Pick up Tuesday's Times-Union to read how the world of bloggers has become attached to the girl's disappearance and the families.


http://jacksonville.com/news/florida/2009-10-19/story/ronald_and_misty_cummings_divorce_goes_through

...and so from early on when Misty came under scrutiny, exactly why WHY! did Ronald Cummings and his mother (and occasionally his grandmom) support this person every opportunity they had?
 
...and so from early on when Misty came under scrutiny, exactly why WHY! did Ronald Cummings and his mother (and occasionally his grandmom) support this person every opportunity they had?

Because they Believed? Just like I do, Misty didn't harm Haleigh.
 
Because they Believed? Just like I do, Misty didn't harm Haleigh.


............no, that can't be it. Ronald divorced her and laid claim to at least her inconsistencies as being ONE reason. Media attention was listed first, family issues listed second, and oh yeah, I am not sure about her inconsistencies.

Inconsistent regarding the disappearance of a child. I'd be all over that like stink on a monkey. I M O.
 
............no, that can't be it. Ronald divorced her and laid claim to at least her inconsistencies as being ONE reason. Media attention was listed first, family issues listed second, and oh yeah, I am not sure about her inconsistencies.

Inconsistent regarding the disappearance of a child. I'd be all over that like stink on a monkey. I M O.


I'm sure you will. It's your right, and I shall never stand in your way. Hugs~~~~
 
yeah Debs, they went way overboard in their support under the circumstances. It would seem to indicate some collusion. That is why I can't shake the suspicion that Ron has knowledge or has some interest in preventing the world from finding out the facts. The children's actual mother, Crystal garnered only scorn.
 
I've got one or two opinions about this divorce, but it sounds so gossipy, that I'm going to withold my thoughts until I see just what I'm looking for. This is one of the times I really hope I'm very wrong.

I do think Ron and family believed what Misty said, and since I haven't seen them actually say they don't, I'm not going to let the drive of a potential rumor looming fool me into seeing something I haven't seen happen, not yet.
 
KL..I think you just posted Misty didn't harm Haleigh as your belief. I think I can correctly assume that you don't think RC did either. IF I am reading your last post the right way, it appears that you have a good idea why they are divorcing. You also stated that you think RC and his family also believe what Misty said is the truth.

Ron believes Misty
Ron marries Misty
Ron divorces Misty

If you can contribute anything logical about this, it would be appreciated because frankly it makes no sense to me.
 
I fully believe Ron was totally pressured and ridiculed into divorcing Misty. If Ron and associates read here. It's not Kool to forsake your wife dude.

Is this what you were looking for Whisperer, if not elaborate, I'll try to reply.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
213
Guests online
574
Total visitors
787

Forum statistics

Threads
627,117
Messages
18,539,026
Members
241,193
Latest member
karmic14U
Back
Top