faefrost
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 2,285
- Reaction score
- 0
I think it's an old law about testifying for or against a spouse. Whether they were married or divorced, I do not believe it means anything legal these days. I believe that Ron has probably thought about everything that has gone on since all this happened and really saw the light, after all of these months. I do believe that Misty is drowning at this time, she is trying to grasp at straws. I really believe that she is panicking and that is why she took a trip to Disneyworld. I think she knows that soon she maybe another Casey Anthony, behind bars. So a trip to DWorld was the last harrah. I believe the party is soon over for Misty.
It certainly doesn't mean anything in this case. For 2 reasons. In Florida I do not believe spousal privelege is retroactive, so anything that happened or was said BEFORE they were married would not be protected. (granting what was said when is dificult to prove). And second, in Fl, spousal privelege does not apply when the investigation or crime involved harm to a child of either of the adults. So there is no way they would have ANY spousal privelege regarding Hayleigh.