GUILTY SC - Christine Parcell 41, fatally stabbed by concert pianist, Greenville, 13 Oct 2021 *Arrest*

I sure wasn’t expecting a one question cross examination.
I don’t remember CP’s body at the crime scene ever being shown up till today. There were pictures of rose petals and bloody floors and couches. Correct if I’m wrong about that.
Maybe the prosecution felt the jury needed to see what ZH did to her. The calm controlled man who testified he struggled and hesitated to hit her or “strike” her, stabbed her repeatedly.
He said he felt unimaginable relief afterward. Most serial killers report that also I think.
This morning I watched ZH’s early testimony yesterday that I missed because our internet was out. I thought his testimony about his adopted sister Grace was weird. He’s sitting there with no emotion, talking about her cold shark eyes, how manipulative and evil she was etc, and all I could think of was he was describing himself.

Just my thoughts
Omg, that last line, I read in my mind exactly what you wrote, before I actually read what you wrote.
Hope I made sense of what I was trying to convey.
 
@dnolan2000


Last night John Mello was denied bond for two charges stemming from his alleged participation in Christina Parcell's murder. Parcell's sister Lutina Parcell spoke at the hearing saying "You will never get rid of me, and that is your own fault."
 
Hughes reentered the courtroom.

The judge is bringing the jury back to begin closing arguments.


The jury has been seated


State begins closing arguments
The state says this is a little bit of a unique case because it's not common for the defendant to explain what he did, and so the state explains that the closing arguments may be different.





The state tells the jury that Zach Hughes is "an admitted cold blooded killer.”





The state thanked the jury for their service. Then went on explaining to the jury that they will make their decision based on the rules from the judge.





The state says they called about 32 witnesses, and that the evidence amounts to about four terabytes of information.





The state is explaining the charges starting with harassment. The state is breaking down the difference between the harassment charges and the providing the definitions of the charges to the jurors. The state then moved on to explain the burglary charge. The state then moved on to explain the murder charge.





The state mentions malice and expressed malice to the jury. The state told the jury that they will be hearing the term malice this afternoon in the judge's instructions as well. The state provides the definition of malice.



The state says, "John Mello was in a nasty custody battle with Christina Parcell" and says that Hughes didn't know Parcell, or meet her in the year leading up to her murder. The state says that everything Hughes knows about Parcell was told to him by Mello or was certain evidence shown to Hughes. The state says that the tide changed for Mello in April 2021 when he took the daughter he shared with Parcell out of the country.



The state says that the daughter of Mello and Parcell did not know Hughes. The state says Hughes had limited interaction with the girl.



The state is going over WhatsApp messages between Mello and Hughes. The state says Hughes deleted attachments on messages in October. The state says Hughes put several pieces together including a cover letter claiming Christina Parcell was engaging in prostitution. The state says that Hughes sent out the mailers to embarrass Parcell.



The state says that South Carolina does not have a revenge 🤬🤬🤬🤬 charge, but instead there is a harassment charge. The state says Zach Hughes put a lot of work into the envelopes for someone who he never talked to and didn't know. The state calls Mello a liar.



The state says that Mello and Hughes were trying to harm Parcell because Mello had a custody problem and the only way to solve it was murder.



The state says that while they believe a lot of what Hughes said was true, that a lot of it was narcissistic junk. The state claims Hughes is trying to portray himself as a hero. The state calls Hughes a pathological killer.



The state tells the jury that the defense wants to call the morality of Parcell into question in this case as a means of justifying the murder. The state says people cannot break into houses and references vigilante justice. The state says that these are all allegations that Mello made against Parcell.

 
I would easily find him guilty, he murdered her, whatever he says his motivations were he is guilty of the crime of murder
And for somebody that says he did what he did to protect the child he has taken away her only protection her father
She is now left alone, either being taken in by the state or by a family member, so she is once again at the mercy of which ever adults take the place of her father and we can only hope that they are loving and kind and take care of her as she now has to learn to live without her father
 
The state says there was a ton of planning that went into this murder. The state says Hughes knew Parcell's schedule because he learned that from Mello. The state then moves on to go back through the timeline of events.

The state played a video showing the moments before Parcell was murdered. The state says that the video shows Hughes entering Parcell's home. The stat then continued detailing the graphic events that unfolded inside the house.


The state says Hughes stabbed Parcell in her jugular and carotid arteries, and that the blunt force trauma happened on the ground. The state then says that Hughes dragged Parcell through the house. The state says the rose petals were left on purpose. The state calls it a "sadistic, artistic sign.”


The state says that this was all not done to help the daughter Parcell and Mello shared, but instead to help Mello.


State says: "He did not want to get caught"
The state says "he did not want to get caught" while saying that Hughes cleaned up after killing Parcell. The state reminds the jury that Hughes discarded the knife and gun in a body of water.



Defense argues that Hughes admitted he killed Parcell but did not confess any crime
The defense says Hughes confessed to killing Parcell, but that does not make him guilty of murder. The defense says that the state told the jury that Hughes confessed to the crime which is not the case.



The defense reminds the jury of the state's burden of proof and reminds the jury that the state has to prove its case to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.



The defense breaks down what the state must prove for each charge.


 
The defense reminds the jury that their side has no burden of proof. The defense explains circumstantial evidence and direct evidence to the jury. The defense says the state will use circumstantial evidence where the defense will use both to explain the mental state Hughes was in during October.


The defense argues that Hughes had more information about the situation involving Christina Parcell than the state told jurors earlier in their closing arguments. The state said that Hughes only had information from Mello along with certain evidence he was shown.


The defense says that there is not malice because Hughes believed that Parcell was a danger to her daughter. The defense argues that if Hughes wanted to help Mello like the state suggested, then he wouldn't have waited to kill Parcell. The defense says that Hughes doesn't think he's a hero, but did what he thought he had to do to save an innocent child.


The defense tells the jury that none of them, nor he have been in the circumstance that Hughes was in when he killed Parcell. The defense says that Mello was out of the country with a warrant pending, that DSS did nothing, and that Hughes had reason to believe an innocent child was being abused by her mother. The defense argues that Hughes did what he thought was right to save the daughter Parcell and Mello shared.


The defense says that the evidence from the state "hasn't come close" to proving what they need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense tells the jury that no matter what your take is on what Hughes did, the defense finds it important for the jury to rely on their common sense.

 
The defense ends closing arguments:
In closing, the defense asks the jury to use the common sense that they brought with them to the courthouse and ask themselves if a person who kills another person in an attempt to save an innocent child, if that person has an evil, or angry heart. The defense says common sense would say no. The defense says the person who killed another person to save an innocent child is not a murderer.





The state's rebuttal to the defense's closing arguments:
The state reminds the jury of the mailers and that photos in those mailers were sent to Parcell's neighbors. The state says that the defense spoke about not trying to minimize this case, minimize killing Christina Parcell by trying to question her character. The state says that just because Hughes's heart is so cold that it can't be angry is not a defense.





The judge gives the jury its instructions:
The judge reminded the jury that both he and they have a duty to perform a duty. He reminds them to disregard testimony that he's told them to disregard in the deliberation room. The jury is only to consider the testimony and exhibits that have been authorized by the judge.

 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
5,042
Total visitors
5,147

Forum statistics

Threads
623,010
Messages
18,460,353
Members
240,242
Latest member
MaryjoGuin
Back
Top