WildHeart
Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2008
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 95
The Post & Courier of Charleston has sued to get the 911 call and other case details released.I'd really like to hear that 911 call.
The Post & Courier of Charleston has sued to get the 911 call and other case details released.I'd really like to hear that 911 call.
RSBM. Here is the letter: DocumentCloud
I think Paul had become a liability.
The family owned such a huge acreage. I wonder if it was an accepted practice to let others hunt there or if they considered the whole area exclusively theirs as if it were a suburban backyard?
Typically in these situations (which are common in the Low Country), the owners will run their property as a hunting estate, meaning, that traveling sportsmen can come and hunt for a fee....it's a business. Back when I lived in that area (1988), daily fees for hunting could run anywhere from $150 to $1000, usually with a minimum stay (3 to 5 days) required. Sometimes an additional "trophy fee" will be assessed if a hunter kills a record-book buck. I don't have any idea what those fees range to now.
Another practice is to lease the hunting rights to a local hunting club, which charges a yearly fee to its members, and sometimes also an initiation fee. Usually these clubs have long waiting lists for admission.
Gosh, this case reads like a made-for-tv movie. Almost makes me feel good to lead a boring, by-no-means wealthy, life.
Idk what to think about all this…. actually the first thing I think is that libel laws - the restraint on printing unverified stories turning PM into a serial killer - don’t apply to the dead. So now it’s open season on anything bad that’s ever been said about himand allegations against him are surely bringing in web traffic…
beyond that …. If the woman who worked in their home & died in a ‘slip & fall’ was in any way injured in the home, the homeowner is likely to be technically liable whether there was any wrongdoing or not. EG if (MOO made up speculation) she stepped onto an old staircase with a rotting riser that no one knew about & had a tragic fall - or even if the M family had told her the staircase was unsafe & to stay off it - the M family would most likely be held liable if sued.
This is because they maintained the staircase in unsafe condition & didn’t try hard to enough to keep her off it …. no actual wrongdoing or even knowledge needed, more of an administrative turn of law to incentivize people to make sure their property is safe. These are general principles of law - no idea how it plays out in SC but the principles are the same all over the US.
Similarly, the M family should’ve had workers comp insurance to compensate any on-the-job injury, which would’ve protected them from lawsuit …. this is a very basic aspect of maintaining a workforce & cannot imagine the Ms didn’t have it. All that, plus them being named as beloved to her in her obituary, makes me think JMO what happened to her was most likely a tragic accident where the M fam stepped up to the plate to help with expenses & support her survivors w/o any implication of fault or wrongdoing by the M family…. MOO
as for the young man who was killed in the road …. that one sounds more curious. Altho the allegations making it curious do come from his broken-hearted mother & they don’t all quite make sense, fit together, or even nec point to PM ….. but regardless of any PM involvement, that one sounds like it could use another look MOO …. thanks to whoever started a thread for the young man Stephen Smith, I’m going to follow that too.
Your points are well taken. And in fairness, we need to factor in envy and even fear…of this very wealthy and powerful family. I don’t think much would have been made about the death of the housekeeper, and you have explained exactly why…but she died after Smith and before Beach. A storyline of rumors was building.
The rumors around the death of Stephen Smith were exacerbated by the way the investigation was handled…perhaps having nothing at all to do with the M family…but that’s how rumors become wildfire. And Mrs Smith deserved as much attention and a through investigation to her son’s death…as the M family are receiving today.
Then there was Mallory Breach’s death…and this family of prosecutors arrive almost immediately and prevent sobriety tests. Essentially, in my opinion, they used their law expertise to protect their family member…as is their right…but how often, over decades, did they use that same expertise as prosecutors and personal injury lawyers…against other families to see that their loved one was punished?
As a parent, I understand what they did. But decisions made by the court are more baffling to me.
All my opinions only.
I guess I wonder how could it be ‘justice-oriented’ if it took his mother MM too ? Given that, attempted robbery gone awry feels like a better fit MOO ….
<modsnip>
I think that Maggie does a lot to illustrate many of the points of discussion in this case. If the family is a target of envy and greed why is it all but impossible to find any criticism of Maggie beyond that she liked to wear fur, which is really more of a philosophical/political matter? Literally every interview on the family in which she was specifically mentioned, she was spoken of positively.I guess I wonder how could it be ‘justice-oriented’ if it took his mother MM too ? Given that, attempted robbery gone awry feels like a better fit MOO ….
<modsnip>
The Post & Courier of Charleston has sued to get the 911 call and other case details released.
I guess I wonder how could it be ‘justice-oriented’ if it took his mother MM too ? Given that, attempted robbery gone awry feels like a better fit MOO ….
<modsnip>
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.