Sustained
Justice for Stacy
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
- Messages
- 2,902
- Reaction score
- 7,683
One theory I haven't seen talked about is the following :
Suppose PM had some incriminating information about one of the boat occupants or one of their close relatives. And just maybe it came to a point where PM said "if I'm going down, you're going down" or something to that effect to the boat occupant. Or maybe it was "if you testify against me, you're going to jail".
So the closer both the criminal and civil cases approached trial, the more pressure on said boat occupant was feeling to lie on the stand about PM driving the boat. At least it's not out of the realm of possibilities IMO that PM was murdered to prevent the possible incrimination of said boat occupant or relative. With trial testimony looming and a civil settlement not happening, the pressure was on. Also, if the boat occupants testified that PM was NOT driving the boat, then someone had to be driving. I find it strange that CC waited until PM was murdered to file his civil petition, especially if he had the backing of the other boat occupants. If this possible incrimination was drug-related, it might explain how PM obtained his cocaine and weed. It could be that PM knew something about the participants in the SS death and threatened to blow the whistle on them.
In this scenario, MM was collateral damage or just maybe she knew of the criminal activity.
Suppose PM had some incriminating information about one of the boat occupants or one of their close relatives. And just maybe it came to a point where PM said "if I'm going down, you're going down" or something to that effect to the boat occupant. Or maybe it was "if you testify against me, you're going to jail".
So the closer both the criminal and civil cases approached trial, the more pressure on said boat occupant was feeling to lie on the stand about PM driving the boat. At least it's not out of the realm of possibilities IMO that PM was murdered to prevent the possible incrimination of said boat occupant or relative. With trial testimony looming and a civil settlement not happening, the pressure was on. Also, if the boat occupants testified that PM was NOT driving the boat, then someone had to be driving. I find it strange that CC waited until PM was murdered to file his civil petition, especially if he had the backing of the other boat occupants. If this possible incrimination was drug-related, it might explain how PM obtained his cocaine and weed. It could be that PM knew something about the participants in the SS death and threatened to blow the whistle on them.
In this scenario, MM was collateral damage or just maybe she knew of the criminal activity.
Last edited: