The other thing I'm wondering...
DH has said AM and Paul were riding around looking at trees (was that before or after dinner the three ate at the house?). And, since neither Maggie's nor Paul's vehicles were near/at the dog kennel area (I'll assume for now they were up near the house instead), I will guess that AM drove them to the kennel area.
Then, murders.
Then, AM left to go to his mom's to create his alibi. Did he leave from the kennel area or did he first run by the house again to wash/change?
When he returned, did he come in the driveway by the kennel end because it's how he always drove in or because it was the closer entrance driveway when coming from his mom's or because he knew there was a scene there for him to "discover"?
If he was innocent & actually turned in & saw the bodies, why/when did he have the wherewithal to take his truck around the "lean-to" building so that his vehicle could be parked to shine the lights on Paul? (I think that's what was described during testimony today, correct?)
To borrow from
@LetsSolvIt 's
photo with labels in the media thread, I've added where I think (& I could be **totally** wrong) AM's car might have been. If so, why would he come in that way so late, after dark, drive around the building & "know" to look there? Or did he drive straight in (parallel to the kennels), then stop when he noticed Paul? When he went to the house to get a gun while waiting on LE, how did he drive? Past Paul, possibly obliterating evidence? Or back up a little, then circle the "lean to" building, then up to the house? When did he see or discover Maggie? It seems like she might have been slightly around a corner of the building?
View attachment 398085
I would like to know the supposed car movements. All of them.
This entire post is very much my own speculation & MOO.
ETA:
And a closeup of that photo with the vehicle headlights on...
View attachment 398101