Was reading another feed on this, and was so pleased to see the Judge’s ruling on no apparent guard rails for the defendant cross if he elects to take the stand. Quite a marvel if even asked. Guess someone is also working to minimize potential damage and if for appeal? IMO. Sorry I’ve not linked to an earlier suitable post. There are many. Sure do appreciate the Judge‘s rulings, no rulings, and handling of this.
ETA: in other reports, some appear to have forgotten IIRC that it was the defense examination questioning of (was it their own witness?) a witness that had opened the scope to some past financial considerations or other potential motive? And to now then want to narrow scope…… amazing! IMO.