Mrs. Plum with the Quiche in the Conservatory.Baloney! There was not two shooters. And this guy did not do a good job of trying to convince anyone of that.
One shooter. MOO.
Mrs. Plum with the Quiche in the Conservatory.Baloney! There was not two shooters. And this guy did not do a good job of trying to convince anyone of that.
One shooter. MOO.
I can't speak for OJ I didn't follow it much.I think juries now expect something out of "Criminal Minds", spoon fed to them. With video, DNA, and 10,000 other things. That is the only way I can understand why Casey Anthony and OJ Simpson are free.
A strange duck, that's a nice way of putting it. I agreeI know Buster isn't on trial so we aren't really able to dig into his life but the guy stumps me in trying to read him. He has such a flat demeanor most of the time in court, yet he saunters in and out lots of days smiling and chatting with family/gf. His interaction with Alex on jail calls doesn't feel engaged. He really comes off as a strange duck to me.
Money honey?Palmbach formed his opinion while out of state based on information provided by the defense and only visited the scene a few days before testifying, at which visit he noticed the pellet indents and the pellet embedded in the upper frame of the door.
So, I ask you: how likely is it that this witness considered that new evidence (new to him) without bias toward the opinion he had formed and communicated prior to seeing those pellet indents and the pellet embedded in the doorframe, knowing he was to testify on behalf the defense today?
DH wants the jury to visit Moselle so each can form (and include in consideration of guilt) their own impressions. But, their own witness merely rolled his own on-scene impressions into whatever preformed opinion he already had. (ETA: IMO).
I think this will end up being a win for the Prosecution.
After she had been shot in the abdomen, yeah right.Yes the waist.
As someone said earlier, he was prolly looking for his pills.
BBM so hard to believe it's been that long. I have an appointments tomorrow and Wednesday and I'm so hoping that the field trip is tomorrow and I don't want them to start deliberating until Thursday and wrap it up Thursday afternoon, lol.Ok that was a rough. What was the point of hiring these gentlemen from out of state who never worked on this case and literally just visited Moselle this weekend? And how are they getting paid?
Also, please pass a note to the jury to take their time if they start deliberation on Wed/Thurs. I have a dentist appointment on Thursday morning.
And we've been here for 6 weeks. Six weeks. What are we going to do when this is over?
That’s what I was getting out of it, but guns and such are not my area, thus why I didn’t get the point . But, to maybe muddle things and in the end shout out the two shooter scenario.Haven't the Defense witnesses contradicted one another?
Pathologist said that armpit temperature would give nothing, Blood spatter expert said the shootings should've come from above so by someone taller or at least from up top.
JMO
That would be a no-no. But you'd think they'd have contacted the defense lawyers who would have spotted contradictions...but alas, this did not happen it seems?Haven't the Defense witnesses contradicted one another?
Pathologist said that armpit temperature would give nothing, Blood spatter expert said the shootings should've come from above so by someone taller or at least from up top.
JMO
Yeah. Sure, no third party actually witnessed the shootings, but if that's what someone considers "reasonable doubt" then very few crimes would end in convictions. That tight time line seals it for me.I think juries now expect something out of "Criminal Minds", spoon fed to them. With video, DNA, and 10,000 other things. That is the only way I can understand why Casey Anthony and OJ Simpson are free.
Got the chicken drinking again and dancing on the bar with it's Purple Heart medal lol. Drinks are flowing the sleuths trying to absorb the defenses two shooter and can't hold two weapons theory. Think it's time for some top shelf shots to keep us in the game so we can try to deal with the smoke, pellet, bullets and mirrors.No chicken! We just gave her a medal, geeez
He said there DEFINITELY wasn’t any unknowns around. He was quite emphatic about it. It was odd. I don’t think he realized what that implied.Someone help me out. On Friday AM was asked if any dog was alerted to any strangers while he was at the kennel. He said no. There is more to this part. I can't find it in my notes.
My point? No dogs alerted to a stranger... And didn't he say he didn't think a stranger was around?
Help me find this....
Did the defense object? LOLTheir own witness just referred to “the defendant “ as the killer.
Yes I was pointing it out since I saw several posts on here commenting on the family's attendance today. But thank you.That is a common and respectful thing to do.
@meanddblj, thank you for posting this as a visual is helpful.Basically if you think of AMs last act before the murder he would have had to get the chicken from Bubba lay it on the lil house and take Bubba over to the kennel. Based on the crime recreation te guns were propped up against the feed room outside so he shot PM 1st and got the other gun and shot MM.
I know Buster isn't on trial so we aren't really able to dig into his life but the guy stumps me in trying to read him. He has such a flat demeanor most of the time in court, yet he saunters in and out lots of days smiling and chatting with family/gf. His interaction with Alex on jail calls doesn't feel engaged. He really comes off as a strange duck to me.
I think the defense knows that’s the only way to get anyone halfway reputable. If they had full access I don’t think they could get anyone. JMO—this is definitely not my field.One huge problem that I have with these defense experts is that the defense didn’t have them write a report and only gave them limited discovery.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.