- Joined
- Jan 28, 2022
- Messages
- 282
- Reaction score
- 2,257
Thanks for the tip on her. Listening now.Same. Emily D Baker.
Thanks for the tip on her. Listening now.Same. Emily D Baker.
Perhaps his lying is ultimate revelation….consider that murderers rarely are truthful. They are consumed by self-importance. Lying is a linchpin to the case. Liars succeed by making others believe them. Sticking to the fact that AM has made a career of lying to honest people is powerful. So, cmon, really?Okay, we know AM is a liar. Stick to the facts of the case.
IMO I am not as passionate as many are as to the outcome of this trial. But I am curious as to what the jury is going to decide. Either way, AM is going away for life for one crime or another he has committed. I might add, it is my suspicion that there is so much more that remains hidden with these corrupt people and those they associate with.Me either. He laid out a fine case based on speculation but that’s all it is. Up to defense to provide alternative speculation. Still winnable for them, though uphill battle. There’s lot of doubt about whether he did it—probably he did, so the question, is the doubt reasonable? State is basing so much of its case on his being a liar—really irrelevant to the specific act—and the timeline, but the real question about the timeline is how he could clean himself up so quickly within that timeline. He killed them then was quickly on the move and yet still managed to get rid of virtually all forensic evidence. Not likely, MOO. And they insinuate the murder weapons had to be his, but no real proof of that, especially with Paul’s weapon missing a long time. Not feeling it.
The Defendant said it about himself, the Prosecutor said that was the only thing he agreed with the Defendant about.Sat on a jury in the 70's with the prosecutor using the same worn out “tangled web” phrase in the same dramatic way.....ended up a hung jury.
Agreed!IMO I am not as passionate as many are as to the outcome of this trial. But I am curious as to what the jury is going to decide. Either way, AM is going away for life for one crime or another he has committed. I might add, it is my suspicion that there is so much more that remains hidden with these corrupt people and those they associate with.
Ahh yes they are. I was thinking he was allowed because he has all his files to work on his case.. guess I assumed he could use a pen. It is a nice thought to know he's headed to jail and can't even have his pen.Pens are dangerous in jail--sharpened as a shank or knife.
It’s not about how long the trial took, it’s about how impactful you can be to an audience without losing their attention. Many people on this forum stated that CW at the end, summarized it really good, however if you have bored the audience for 3 hours prior to that, it’s not as impactful because some of the people on the jury have drown him out already.Imo, three hours isn't long for a 7 week trial.
Seeing these 3 coming at you on the street would be a fate worse than death. The world is just a prop to them. They love nobody but themselves. Anyone in the way is a goner. The horrible evil will follow the whole family forever. Moo. Very kennedylike...
Fits News on YouTube has been my favoriteWhat other media podcasts or video streaming services have analysis of the day in court that are more objective than the usual choices?
Add it to the list.Maybe he’s really a closet klepper
Perhaps his lying is ultimate revelation….consider that murderers rarely are truthful. They are consumed by self-importance. Lying is a linchpin to the case. Liars succeed by making others believe them. Sticking to the fact that AM has made a career of lying to honest people is powerful. So, cmon, really?
Maybe jury charges?
We saw that on live! DH did nod right off and then it's like his head falling back woke him up.Yes. I wondered why they didn't have lunch first and then start the closing. I also forget where I read this, but I read somewhere that one of the breaks was due to someone on the defense team falling asleep at the table. I don't remember where I read this so take this as unconfirmed - I don't mean to violate any rules here.
It might have already been said, but perhaps a ‘shiv’ as well? MO.I think pens might be a hot item for them.. I recall he was so excited to win 6 soups and 4 meat sticks or maybe it was the other way around over the football game betting.. maybe pens are a good for trading?
I think the State luckily had that great apple bite of revisiting verbally the haunting Moselle murder scene back in the courthouse.He lied about his alibi, pretty relevant to the case, presented all the facts of timeline data
Moo
This has been my go-to. Also used Drew's Live Blog in the MEDIA ONLY thread.What other media podcasts or video streaming services have analysis of the day in court that are more objective than the usual choices?