ACTIVE SEARCH SD - Serenity Dennard, 9, Children’s Home Society, Pennington County, 3 Feb 2019 #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
I prayed for her last night. My only worry is, was she thrown in the trash and burned at a landfill. I hate even saying such a horrific sentence. I do pray she was found and is with someone who is good.

You "hate saying such a horrific sentence", yet you have said it on here before. I too am praying she is alive and will hold on to that prayer until we know differently.

However, I am curious as to what you mean by repeating "the sentence?" :confused:
 
  • #162
"The staff of the Black Hills Children’s Home should have called 911 immediately rather than waiting one hour and 41 minutes after a girl ran away from the facility, according to reports from two regulatory agencies.


The reports also say, among other things, that the facility lacked a sufficient emergency preparedness plan, failed to conduct training or drills for runaways, fell into complacency after previous attempted runaways, conducted an initially disorganized search for the runaway girl, used several different radio communication channels during the initial search instead of one common channel, and did not follow the organization’s own policy regarding lost children on campus."

...

"The CMS report includes quotes from an interview with the program director at the Children’s Home, Tim Fitzgerald, who said, “It took staff 1.5 hours to contact 911, that should have been done when staff first lost sight of her.”

The Children’s Home had a Lost Child on Campus policy that dated to 1999, according to the CMS report, and one of the steps in the policy was notification of law enforcement.

But the policy was not followed, because staff had not been trained or drilled on it, the CMS report said. The facility now has a new runaway policy that says that 911 must be called immediately, and staff must now receive training, testing and drilling on the policy.

The DSS report also mentioned 911, saying in part, “If a child runs from a staff member and visual contact is lost, 911 must be called immediately.”



Facility botched runaway response, reports say

ETA: Sorry for the failed formatting, my fix isn't working.
 
Last edited:
  • #163
  • #164
"The staff of the Black Hills Children’s Home should have called 911 immediately rather than waiting one hour and 41 minutes after a girl ran away from the facility, according to reports from two regulatory agencies.


The reports also say, among other things, that the facility lacked a sufficient emergency preparedness plan, failed to conduct training or drills for runaways, fell into complacency after previous attempted runaways, conducted an initially disorganized search for the runaway girl, used several different radio communication channels during the initial search instead of one common channel, and did not follow the organization’s own policy regarding lost children on campus."

...

"The CMS report includes quotes from an interview with the program director at the Children’s Home, Tim Fitzgerald, who said, “It took staff 1.5 hours to contact 911, that should have been done when staff first lost sight of her.”

The Children’s Home had a Lost Child on Campus policy that dated to 1999, according to the CMS report, and one of the steps in the policy was notification of law enforcement.

But the policy was not followed, because staff had not been trained or drilled on it, the CMS report said. The facility now has a new runaway policy that says that 911 must be called immediately, and staff must now receive training, testing and drilling on the policy.

The DSS report also mentioned 911, saying in part, “If a child runs from a staff member and visual contact is lost, 911 must be called immediately.”



Facility botched runaway response, reports say

ETA: Sorry for the failed formatting, my fix isn't working.
And let the lawsuits begin......
 
  • #165
"The staff of the Black Hills Children’s Home should have called 911 immediately rather than waiting one hour and 41 minutes after a girl ran away from the facility, according to reports from two regulatory agencies.


The reports also say, among other things, that the facility lacked a sufficient emergency preparedness plan, failed to conduct training or drills for runaways, fell into complacency after previous attempted runaways, conducted an initially disorganized search for the runaway girl, used several different radio communication channels during the initial search instead of one common channel, and did not follow the organization’s own policy regarding lost children on campus."

...

"The CMS report includes quotes from an interview with the program director at the Children’s Home, Tim Fitzgerald, who said, “It took staff 1.5 hours to contact 911, that should have been done when staff first lost sight of her.”

The Children’s Home had a Lost Child on Campus policy that dated to 1999, according to the CMS report, and one of the steps in the policy was notification of law enforcement.

But the policy was not followed, because staff had not been trained or drilled on it, the CMS report said. The facility now has a new runaway policy that says that 911 must be called immediately, and staff must now receive training, testing and drilling on the policy.

The DSS report also mentioned 911, saying in part, “If a child runs from a staff member and visual contact is lost, 911 must be called immediately.”



Facility botched runaway response, reports say

ETA: Sorry for the failed formatting, my fix isn't working.

Thank you for posting this!

Finally, what many of us have thought was at least part of it from early on. Whether we will hear everything or not, at least it has said what was obvious, that considering the location and the type of children they care for, something went very wrong here.
 
  • #166
  • #167
People - let me call your attention to the VICTIM FRIENDLY portion of the WS Rules;

Websleuths is a victim friendly forum. Attacking or bashing a victim is not allowed. Discussing victim behavior, good or bad is fine, but do so in a civil and constructive way, and only when such behavior is relevant to the case.

"The "victim friendly" rule extends to the family members of victims and suspects. Sleuthing family members, friends, and others who have not been designated as suspects is not allowed. Don't make random accusations, suggest their involvement, nor bash and attack them. Posting their personal information, including names, addresses, and background data -- even if it is public -- is not allowed. That does not mean, however, that statements made by family members and other third parties cannot come into discussion as the facts of the case are reported in the media."

The discussion here has gone off the rails and away from the victim in this case. The parental figures here including the new wife of the adoptive Dad are considered victims too. Please refrain from derogatory comments about them especially with regard to information we do not know. Speculation, drawing negative conclusions about their personal lives, parenting shortfalls, etc. is out of bounds. What we have is their interviews with the Senator, information in MSM and from LE and that is all. We know nothing about marital troubles, grounds for divorce or their own mental health issues.
Also, this is not a psychology forum. We have no official diagnoses of Serenity's issues from a qualified professional. Statements have been made and that is all. The deep discussion of the psychology of RAD and etc. is both unnecessary and inappropriate and so, for now, is off limits unless someone has personal information about them and becomes a Verified Case Insider.

Please ease up on these other victims, have some compassion for their loss and get back to the Active Search for the missing child Serenity Dennard.

 
  • #168
No training. No good.

How long would it have taken LE to get there?
 
  • #169
"The staff of the Black Hills Children’s Home should have called 911 immediately rather than waiting one hour and 41 minutes after a girl ran away from the facility, according to reports from two regulatory agencies.


The reports also say, among other things, that the facility lacked a sufficient emergency preparedness plan, failed to conduct training or drills for runaways, fell into complacency after previous attempted runaways, conducted an initially disorganized search for the runaway girl, used several different radio communication channels during the initial search instead of one common channel, and did not follow the organization’s own policy regarding lost children on campus."

...

"The CMS report includes quotes from an interview with the program director at the Children’s Home, Tim Fitzgerald, who said, “It took staff 1.5 hours to contact 911, that should have been done when staff first lost sight of her.”

The Children’s Home had a Lost Child on Campus policy that dated to 1999, according to the CMS report, and one of the steps in the policy was notification of law enforcement.

But the policy was not followed, because staff had not been trained or drilled on it, the CMS report said. The facility now has a new runaway policy that says that 911 must be called immediately, and staff must now receive training, testing and drilling on the policy.

The DSS report also mentioned 911, saying in part, “If a child runs from a staff member and visual contact is lost, 911 must be called immediately.”



Facility botched runaway response, reports say

ETA: Sorry for the failed formatting, my fix isn't working.
Thanks.
I don't think anybody on here is doubting the fact that LE should have been called after she was seen outside, off the Home property, and then was out of sight. I can possibly understand during the first 15 minutes when they thought she was hiding inside, like she had done before, but once it was known she was outside and off the grounds, the protocol should have been to call LE immediately.

They will learn from this, and make sure all staff knows and is drilled in proper procedure, but that doesn't help find Serenity.
 
  • #170
  • #171
<modsnip>The issue, it seems, had more to do with a communication issue between DG and CD than anything else. We are too quick to jump to conclusions without knowing what was actually happening. Let's not assume that DG had no desire to be part of Serenity's life. Nothing is as simple at it seems.

Very well said, and I agree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #172
Yeah......but who really lost here......her.
No one wins, they’ve all lost but Serenity paid the ultimate price. I do hope some of the funds that were donated around the time she disappeared will go towards weather shelters. Just simple little 6’ x 6’ wooden structures around the property. They could be for unexpected rain, wind, snow, etc. In zoos, parks and botanical gardens we have rain shelters which are open pavilions. They’re very helpful.
 
  • #173
In the end, all that matters is somehow, someway they find Serenity... hopefully alive!
 
  • #174
You "hate saying such a horrific sentence", yet you have said it on here before. I too am praying she is alive and will hold on to that prayer until we know differently.

However, I am curious as to what you mean by repeating "the sentence?" :confused:
Yes, I repeated that sentence BECAUSE I am worried about that having happened. If they do not find her remains, sadly this is the possibility of what happened and that bothers me.
 
  • #175
  • #176
Yes, I repeated that sentence BECAUSE I am worried about that having happened. If they do not find her remains, sadly this is the possibility of what happened and that bothers me.

Fair enough, do you think it involved the center, or elsewhere IF that would have happened? I am not questioning an idea you may have, just curious is all.
 
  • #177
  • #178
If they searched for 15 mins and then called LE who arrived in 20 mins, if she was outside she was probsbly very very ill
There is no proof that she was outside that entire 15 minutes though.
On the other hand, it would have taken another 20 minutes minutes after LE got there, assessed the situation, and called for S&R for S&R to get there and even begin searching. Notice that it was 43 minutes from the time the first deputy got there (12:45) until the time S&R got there (1:28). So it still would have been over an hour until S&R began their search. So yes, by then the cold definitely would have been affecting her.
As it was, by the time S&R got there, she had already been out in the cold for over two and a half hours, and the temperatures were dropping and the wind was picking up. So unless something else happened, she definitely would have been in severe distress.
 
  • #179
Another case I saw back when was put down to lack of training and very similar issues found.

It does show all employees are not experienced nor trained in every facility nor is every facility the same.

To me that also comes most likely to the almighty $$ which is all too common. Cameras, training, hiring and retaining experienced help. I will also add it is not so far fetched now to believe if not trained in one area nor knowledgeable about protocols and rules, they may not be trained in how to handle the children and more either and what to do. That is not really a leap.

I do wish this report had addressed security and cameras.

Whether any of it would have made a difference, we may never know. What really happened, we may never know.

I do hope and pray she is found. I doubt it will bring the answers though.
 
  • #180
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
2,587
Total visitors
2,706

Forum statistics

Threads
632,085
Messages
18,621,816
Members
243,017
Latest member
thaines
Back
Top