and the mess that took place last week I really think she knows what happened and is covering for her boyfriend. issue in general. Reading the SWA there seems to be some question as if it was a child or not. A person into child would have MASSIVE amounts of it. It's not "iffy" Not 1-3 photo's. Perhaps it was something like those young appearing 18 year old dressed up in a school girl outfits? at all on the memory stick from Billies house. How long has LE lead us to believe it was?:waitasec: I have a problem with that. 
I totally agree with you FTK. I'm starting to see the light on her. After all this stuff with the child
I am growing concerned about the child
IMO The bulk of what he had on his computer would be what he was "into" and it seems to me the bulk of what he's into is legal. ( As disgusting as I think it is)
I'm not convinced, especially after reading there was no child
I think LE's goal was to get them separated by any means necessary.
images found on the mother's computer, not very many of those images was illegal CP. Glad they were at least able to use what they did find to obtain the search warrants for the grandmother's place.
I am growing concerned about the child
IMO The bulk of what he had on his computer would be what he was "into" and it seems to me the bulk of what he's into is legal. ( As disgusting as I think it is)
I'm not convinced, especially after reading there was no child
I think LE's goal was to get them separated by any means necessary.
at his mother's while he was living there during the time they were broken up or even during the years he was living with his mother prior to his relationship with BD. That might have been the only computer he really had access to for some time. And perhaps he did get a laptop of his own at some point so he downloaded the pictures to the memory sticks and deleted them off his mother's computer. He may have then uploaded them to his own computer and kept the flashdrives for a second copy. is too much.
I am growing concerned about the child
IMO The bulk of what he had on his computer would be what he was "into" and it seems to me the bulk of what he's into is legal. ( As disgusting as I think it is)
I'm not convinced, especially after reading there was no child
I think LE's goal was to get them separated by any means necessary.
Just one image of child
~jmo~
as Shawn does ( every free second of his day) could inadvertently stumble upon a pic or two of CP. . I didn't click anything, I was FREAKED out and reported the link to the FBI. . and I have parental controls set up!
I am also thinking that of the approx 108000
Personally I think that SA did have his own laptop computer for his "hobby" and that it, along with any flashdrives/memory cards have long been destroyed and/or discarded.
It's just too odd that from the beginning it has been stated numerous times by BD and her "friends" that neither BD or SA had a computer or any access to the internet after finding out how much SA seemed to enjoy his computer time.
MOO
I am growing concerned about the child
IMO The bulk of what he had on his computer would be what he was "into" and it seems to me the bulk of what he's into is legal. ( As disgusting as I think it is)
I'm not convinced, especially after reading there was no child
I think LE's goal was to get them separated by any means necessary.
{as I believe I have basically done in these past weeks with what we were led to believe}.. and beastiality on the memory stick taken from Billie's bedroom..We now read today that is FALSE.. is even "child" ..Especially when he gets specific stating that the ONE PHOTO FOUND ON GRANDMA'S COMPUTER IS SIMILAR TO ONE ON MOM"S COMPUTER IN BIG SPRING..AND IT IS NOT EVEN FOR SURE A MINOR THAT IS IN THE ONE PHOTO..AGAIN THE ONE PHOTO SEEMS TO BE THE SAME AS THE PHOTO ON MOM"S COMPUTER>>THAT EQUALS ONE PHOTO>>>ONE PHOTO THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE A MINOR!!!!!!!!!!!! AS IN VIEWING IT! pix that the girl looks young.....IF THE AGE IS QUESTIONABLE..IT EASILY COULD BE ON A TEEN SITE IS WHAT I AM SAYING..THEREFOR THE PERSON VIEWING THE BEL;IEVES THAT ALL ON THE SITE ARE OF AGE..i JUST AM VERY UPSET ABOUT THIS..I AM RELIEVED IN A WAY BECAUSE I KNOW THIS MAN IS NOT DEALING cp..HE'S NOT ADDICTED TO IT..I just am holding all judgements until this LE is clear on what the he!! is even on the devices!
...that would put other affadavits in doubt in this case, at least for me.
Linda I am right there with ya..and believe me I've wanted Shawn and Billie both strung up for what all's happened..so I would be the first in line to condemn them and blast them to he!! myself for child
And let's talk about what we've been led to believe.. namely just as you mentioned LE made direct statements to the media{therefor to us the public}that there was in fact child
In fact we also read today and find that actually there seems to be a question as to whether or not this child
Not hundreds of thousands of pics and VIDEOS WE HAVE BEEN LED TO BELIEVE..not any VIDEOS AT ALL!
I HAVE A VERY VERY BIG PROBLEM WITH WHAT IS GOING ON AS FAR AS SHAWN ADKINS AND THE CHILD
IMO WE HAVE BEEN GROSSLY MISLEAD!!!!
THESE ARE NOT THE COMPUTER..ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES OWNED SEARCHED AND ANALYZED..THESE ARE NOT THOSE OF A CHILD PORNOGRAPHER NOR OF SOMEONE WHO ENJOYS CHILD
It seems to me that most like we are talking 2-maybe to 5 questionable
anyone google hot teens? take a look at what comes back just from googling that?? those girls are all 18 and up but could pass for 14 some of them..
I am disgusted with this and not in the way that I expected that I would be when the affidavits were released..but in a way that IMO Shawn Adkins as far as CP is concerned has been grossly inaccurate in the press by LE..and they should be concerned IMO about a real quick..slam dunk slander lawsuit..
I'm disgusted..and yet still no sign of Hailey..Someone needs to get on the ball NOW!
, based on the wording of the affidavit. It may be that we were misled just days before the 911 trafficking convention when the pornographic deviancy was revealed to the public. But, imo, there's as good a chance that LE simply revealed as little as possible to secure a search warrant (being that this is a high profile case and possibly very near the point of filing charges; keeping it close to the vest). I'm choosing to believe the latter right now, but I share your worry that it may be the former. We shall see (soon, I hope). with teenagers and LE is racing to prove reasonably that none of those depicted could be of legal age to consent. It's time consuming investigative work to track down individuals in an underground industry, but must be done (and discreetly) before charges are filed or reasonable doubt will be pervasive, imo. JMO...
found. Man this won't be good then for LE and I agree with smooth operator that a lawsuit could be in the works. Man.
I read the affidavits and didn't realize that made it sound like there were hardly no
Willen; we're just not sure how much of it is illegal at this point. Whether it's because LE isn't yet sure or they just don't want it public at this time is debatable... Inquiring minds want to know!
