Sheri Coleman, sons Garett and Gavin murdered 5-5-09, Columbia, IL. Pt3

[Texas Mist]

I'm no legal eagle but are we maybe talking abt a current case which would maybe explain idlesleuths vague information?

Hhmmm...I'm a bit suspicious of Idlesleuth posting 1st message when another new poster was offline after posting continuously for past coupla days...

Just sayin' -lol

talk about a 'hit and run' post!

it is sorta hinky to do something like that...why this forum?

 

[mikeysmommom]

Hahahaha~ YOUR computer?! You should see mine! OMG!

No worries tho...we promise to sleuth the hell out of your case and bring you justice. I prefer to keep you around instead...so if you ever find yourself in a position to get whacked...let us know. We will arrive with computers blazing and LE riding shotgun. :Banane37: :cop:

ETA: Where is everyone?

Thank you LOL I dont think I will be whacked but I am nosy so you never know LOL LMAO at the visual:blowkiss:

 

[Kimster]

What do you think Coleman was really doing for his Employer? Why was JM so invested in this guy and his "work"?
Why do you think Coleman was always traveling? Who was he working with? WHERE?
Why do you think Coleman chose the "I'm being threatened" alibi? Why would he believe that others would find it plausible that someone would be so very , very angry with Coleman and his "work" that this person would commit triple murder? Why the threats?

These are the comments that are intriguing me the most. The phantom poster is suggesting CC was doing something other than what has been reported, IMO.

 

[pres101]

Folks,

Why do you think LE seized Coleman's "work related security equipment"? Hint, he wasn't guarding anyone and his equipment was related to surreptitious surveillance.
What do you think Coleman was really doing for his Employer? Why was JM so invested in this guy and his "work"?
Why do you think Coleman was always traveling? Who was he working with? WHERE?
Why do you think Coleman chose the "I'm being threatened" alibi? Why would he believe that others would find it plausible that someone would be so very , very angry with Coleman and his "work" that this person would commit triple murder? Why the threats?
What do you think are the supposed code of conduct violations that s the official reason for JMM firing Coleman (after the fact)? Hint: it wasn't about his alleged affair and it involved his work related activities.

Come on sleuths, see if you can put this together........

Find out what *exactly* Coleman did for a living and where and you will be half way there.

Black Male. 18 years, U.S.C. class of 1875

Analytical, do you have the inside scoop on this?

 

[Kimster]

talk about a 'hit and run' post!

it is sorta hinky to do something like that...why this forum?

Perhaps it is a member who wants us to know something but is afraid that if they tell us, someone else will know it is them? I took their actions to be out of fear of being exposed more than anything.

 

[christee]

talk about a 'hit and run' post!

it is sorta hinky to do something like that...why this forum?

Gosh, IDK

People do some strange things for attention
Maybe it's an ego thing

or my brain is too mushy to make any sensible thoughts!

 

[analytical]

BLACKMAIL and EXTORTION in connection with surveillance

U.S.C. 18 section 873
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/index.html

US CODE: TITLE 18,873. BLACKMAIL
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE/PART I - CRIMES/CHAPTER 41 -EXTORTION AND THREATS ===========================
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/s...tml/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000873----000-.html

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 41 > § 873

Blackmail

Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
----------------------------------------
IdleSleuth ... is this why he submitted voluntarily to questioning for approx. 7 hours of the day of the murders but this "side" issue requires criminal defense and hired Margulis for defense of something "revealed", if you will, during questioning. Hmmmmm .....

Well ... seems obvious!

 

[RR0004]

Having TOD (TOD as pronounced by the coroner on scene) is common in obits down here.
It means NOTHING more than the time the coroner pronounced TOD.

The Coleman's bodies were not removed from the home until sometime after the 6pm news on that Tuesday. I recall a newscaster reporting on it at 6pm that evening saying that investigators and the deceased family was still in the home during that broadcast.

And Google is your friend...

Google: Family Choice Chester IL

Now that makes sense...thought it was odd that they would have removed the bodies so early on as it was an active crime scene.

 

[mikeysmommom]

I think its really great that LE continues to observe CC. More than one poster here has mentioned that there is a strong possibility that CC could decide to "do himself in" and possibly take other innocent lives with him!

IMO If I lived in that town I would be going crazy.Anyone who can murder in cold blood like this is a coward and may want to go out in a hail of gunfire.I would be a nervous nelly till he is in a cell where he belongs.

 

[Kimster]

BLACKMAIL and EXTORTION in connection with surveillance

U.S.C. 18 section 873
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/index.html

US CODE: TITLE 18,873. BLACKMAIL
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE/PART I - CRIMES/CHAPTER 41 -EXTORTION AND THREATS ===========================
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/s...tml/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000873----000-.html

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 41 > § 873

Blackmail

Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
----------------------------------------
IdleSleuth ... is this why he submitted voluntarily to questioning for approx. 7 hours of the day of the murders but this "side" issue requires criminal defense and hired Margulis for defense of something "revealed", if you will, during questioning. Hmmmmm .....

Well ... seems obvious!

vvvvvveeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyy interesting!!!

 

[mikeysmommom]

What do you think Coleman was really doing for his Employer? Why was JM so invested in this guy and his "work"?
Why do you think Coleman was always traveling? Who was he working with? WHERE?
Why do you think Coleman chose the "I'm being threatened" alibi? Why would he believe that others would find it plausible that someone would be so very , very angry with Coleman and his "work" that this person would commit triple murder? Why the threats?

These are the comments that are intriguing me the most. The phantom poster is suggesting CC was doing something other than what has been reported, IMO.

Maybe he was black mailing JM, set up camera s she did not know about, or maybe her hubby doing something?

 

[chestergal]

I'm no legal eagle but are we maybe talking abt a current case which would maybe explain idlesleuths vague information?

Hhmmm...I'm a bit suspicious of Idlesleuth posting 1st message when another new poster was offline after posting continuously for past coupla days...

Just sayin' -lol

I hope you don't mean me because I get logged out often on WS or I lose my internet connection. Sometimes I forget to check the remember me icon at log in and once I close my browser window or if I lose my isp connection I have to log back in.

I am going to stay logged in and go do dishes. I'll see if I get logged out again before I get back to the board after doing dishes.

 

[Kimster]

I hope you don't mean me because I get logged out often on WS or I lose my internet connection. Sometimes I forget to check the remember me icon at log in and once I close my browser window or if I lose my isp connection I have to log back in.

I am going to stay logged in and go do dishes. I'll see if I get logged out again before I get back to the board after doing dishes.

Doing dishes in the middle of the night? Now THAT's suspicious!

 

[pferrin]

And who would he be blackmailing? JM?

 

[Kimster]

And who would he be blackmailing? JM?

I don't know but I'll bet you Miss Motive knows! That might be what she'll be testifying about for the Grand Jury!

How would it be against JM though? When she first heard about the murders, she ran over and gave him support. I don't think she would have done that if she was being blackmailed?

:waitasec:

 

[Texas Mist]

Perhaps it is a member who wants us to know something but is afraid that if they tell us, someone else will know it is them? I took their actions to be out of fear of being exposed more than anything.

you're probably right, Kimster...just a little skeptical after reading so many different "facts" on the various message boards.

hope we can figure this one out!

 

[analytical]

And who would he be blackmailing? JM?

Don't know. I'd felt all along there was MUCH more to this case than meets the eye.

He did own or operate a "video surveillance company" .. it's in the posts somewhere but at this hour I'm not too "swift" to find that post.

Could his actions have resuilted in the deaths of his wife and children? He was blackmailing someone ... he got warned to "stop" ... he didn't so he got "payback.."
----------------
Obviously this came out during questioning the day of the murders .. the standard question .. "do you have any enemies ... is there anyone you know that might have a reason to want to harm your family"?

 

[Texas Mist]

I hope you don't mean me because I get logged out often on WS or I lose my internet connection. Sometimes I forget to check the remember me icon at log in and once I close my browser window or if I lose my isp connection I have to log back in.

I am going to stay logged in and go do dishes. I'll see if I get logged out again before I get back to the board after doing dishes.

I certainly didn't think the reference was to you, chestergal.

:blowkiss:

you are much appreciated!

 

[RR0004]

you're probably right, Kimster...just a little skeptical after reading so many different "facts" on the various message boards.

hope we can figure this one out!

I wouldn't be surprised if we don't hear anything else.

 

[DairyGirl]

BLACKMAIL and EXTORTION in connection with surveillance

U.S.C. 18 section 873
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/index.html

US CODE: TITLE 18,873. BLACKMAIL
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE/PART I - CRIMES/CHAPTER 41 -EXTORTION AND THREATS ===========================
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/s...tml/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000873----000-.html

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 41 > § 873

Blackmail

Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
----------------------------------------
IdleSleuth ... is this why he submitted voluntarily to questioning for approx. 7 hours of the day of the murders but this "side" issue requires criminal defense and hired Margulis for defense of something "revealed", if you will, during questioning. Hmmmmm .....

Well ... seems obvious!

Was he the blackmailer or the blackmailee?