SIDEBAR #18- Arias/Alexander forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
What does motion for change venue mean ?
I think it's about time for this to be over and she goes to prison either death are LWOP
this is going on and on

Change of Venue is asking the Court to hold the hearing in another location for other jurors than locals, or in the alternative, ship in prospective jurors from another location. Location meaning another city or county.

Really, it doesn't matter now, she is convicted, sentencing is the only thing left. Those that watch the news know of the case, but probably not a lot of details. Not many follow cases like we do here. Some don't watch news at all. Some refuse to even think about bad news and murder cases.
 
Change of Venue is asking the Court to hold the hearing in another location for other jurors than locals, or in the alternative, ship in prospective jurors from another location. Location meaning another city or county.

Really, it doesn't matter now, she is convicted, sentencing is the only thing left. Those that watch the news know of the case, but probably not a lot of details. Not many follow cases like we do here. Some don't watch news at all. Some refuse to even think about bad news and murder cases.

BBM~ Yip. She is a convicted murderess. And correct, when I used to talk to others about the case, they'd say: "Who's that?". It's amazing how many people don't follow the news and don't care to. Also, not many out there who are true crime addicts. ;)
 
What does motion for change venue mean ?
I think it's about time for this to be over and she goes to prison either death are LWOP
this is going on and on

-----------
Means DT. wants the penalty trial moved to another County in Az..I will be amazed if they get it! She deserves what she gave Travis, DEATH nothing else..:seeya:
 
-----------
Means DT. wants the penalty trial moved to another County in Az..I will be amazed if they get it! She deserves what she gave Travis, DEATH nothing else..:seeya:

Jodi knows darn well she will get the DP. She is using these frivolous motions to stall. I wish JSS would just put her foot down and just say ENOUGH!!! :scream:
 
Jodi Arias ‏@JodiAnnArias 5h
The trouble with peanut butter is that it gets EVERYWHERE.


She needs to stay in di-da-s-du-di (prison) for life grrrr!
 
Here's a link to an article from the spring talking about 5 cases in Maricopa county where there were penalty phase retrials. http://www.azcentral.com/news/arizo...hat-couldnt-decide-on-death-penalty-prog.html

One of the five was due to a hung jury in the first penalty phase. Oddly enough, the defendant's name was Martinez. From an article on AZCentral " He first went to trial for the murder charge on August 31, 2009 and was found guilty on November 3, 2009. But that jury deadlocked over life and death on Dec. 1.

Martinez' attorneys tried several tacks to get the death notice dropped, but to no avail, and a new jury began considering the death penalty on March 3.

So his first trial took just over two months to reach a guilty verdict. According to the article, it took four more weeks before the jury deadlocked on the penalty decision. This was not a high profile case, but it still took more than four months for the retrial to begin.

The moral of the story...the delay we are seeing now is not unusual.

Keep the faith.
 
Jodi Arias ‏@JodiAnnArias 5h
The trouble with peanut butter is that it gets EVERYWHERE.


She needs to stay in di-da-s-du-di (prison) for life grrrr!

I'd really like to know who is tweeting on her behalf?? Family member? Prison worker? A pen pal?
 
Here's a link to an article from the spring talking about 5 cases in Maricopa county where there were penalty phase retrials. http://www.azcentral.com/news/arizo...hat-couldnt-decide-on-death-penalty-prog.html

One of the five was due to a hung jury in the first penalty phase. Oddly enough, the defendant's name was Martinez. From an article on AZCentral " He first went to trial for the murder charge on August 31, 2009 and was found guilty on November 3, 2009. But that jury deadlocked over life and death on Dec. 1.

Martinez' attorneys tried several tacks to get the death notice dropped, but to no avail, and a new jury began considering the death penalty on March 3.

So his first trial took just over two months to reach a guilty verdict. According to the article, it took four more weeks before the jury deadlocked on the penalty decision. This was not a high profile case, but it still took more than four months for the retrial to begin.

The moral of the story...the delay we are seeing now is not unusual.

Keep the faith.

I have faith there will be Justice for Travis. :angel:

This is why i'm still here! lol
 
Jodi Arias ‏@JodiAnnArias 5h
The trouble with peanut butter is that it gets EVERYWHERE.


She needs to stay in di-da-s-du-di (prison) for life grrrr!


Is that tweet a complaint or is she taking a shot at trying to be comical.
Either way, Travis's blood was everywhere...that didn't seem to bother her much.
 
Jodi Arias ‏@JodiAnnArias 5h
The trouble with peanut butter is that it gets EVERYWHERE.


She needs to stay in di-da-s-du-di (prison) for life grrrr!

my stomch turned at the thought of that,i seriously need to go bleach mind or go spend a week in a monastery :floorlaugh:
 
JMO........I understand that this is a pro-victim forum. What I do not understand is the utter disbelief that I see in most posts, that a perpetrator, or a convicted murderer would try to spin the truth to save themselves from the vengeance of "society". The DT Always has their work cut out for them. They MUST advocate for their client. In this case, they had to scrape up witnesses for the defense. They thought they had a doosey in ALV! Who knows how many people "experts" they combed through before they found her? They did dream up a plea deal before the trial started (plead to 2nd degree) but no way was JM going to accept it, for obviously good reasons. ALV was a witness for the SOLE purpose of finding domestic violence in the relationship and blaming Travis. She knew what the job required and did nothing more. It wasn't her job to look at ALL angles. She was NOT privy to all the evidence, just very selective evidence. I personally think that she's a fool, but she did what was required of her. She may WELL know the truth NOW, but I'm not convinced that she knew it at the time of her testimony. (I also think that the "death threats" aren't keeping her away, rather, DT doesn't WANT her, because now she would HAVE to perjure herself). If they want her, they can subpoena her..........
 
Is that tweet a complaint or is she taking a shot at trying to be comical.
Either way, Travis's blood was everywhere...that didn't seem to bother her much.

Evening Ricki :seeya:
It bothers me to no end that she is able to tweet her nonsense tweetles to the world :scared: (and that people read them!!! :stormingmad:).
I tried to search the Arizona prison/jail rules and regulations to find out if there is some kind of why to stop her on social media . This is all I found (not very enlightening, IMO):
====================================================
31-128. Unauthorized communication with prisoner; classification
A person not authorized by law who, without permission of the officer in charge of a jail, communicates with a person imprisoned or detained therein, or who takes any letter, writing, literature or reading matter to or from a person imprisoned or detained therein, is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.
31-235. Prisoner correspondence; definitions
A. The department shall mark all mail written by a prisoner committed to the state department of corrections indicating that the mail was sent from a prison maintained by this state.
B. An inmate shall not send mail to the victim of the offense for which the inmate was convicted, or to members of the victim's family or household denoted by the victim, if the victim has requested not to receive mail pursuant to section 13-4411.01. The department shall inform the inmate of persons to whom the inmate is forbidden to send mail pursuant to this section and section 13-4411.01. The department shall impose appropriate sanctions, including reducing or denying earned release credits, against an inmate who corresponds or attempts to correspond with a person in violation of the request pursuant to section 13-4411.01.
C. An inmate shall not send mail to or receive mail from a communication service provider or remote computing service. The department shall impose appropriate sanctions, including reducing or denying earned release credits, against an inmate if either of the following applies:
1. The inmate corresponds or attempts to correspond with a communication service provider or remote computing service.
2. Any person accesses the provider's or service's internet web site at the inmate's request.
D. On receipt of notice that an inmate has violated subsection B or C of this section, the department shall review all of the inmate's outgoing mail to ensure that no further correspondence is sent to the victim or to the victim's family or household members who have requested not to receive inmate mail or to the communication service provider or remote computing service or any person who accesses the provider's or service's internet web site.
E. For the purposes of this section:
1. "Communication service provider" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3004.
2. "Remote computing service" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3004.
31-242. Internet access; violation; classification; definitions
A. Except as authorized by the department, an inmate shall not have access to the internet through the use of a computer, computer system, network, communication service provider or remote computing service.
B. An inmate who violates this section is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor.
C. For the purposes of this section:
1. "Communication service provider" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3004.
2. "Computer" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-2301, subsection E.
3. "Computer system" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-2301, subsection E.
4. "Network" means a complex of interconnected computer or communication systems of any type.
5. "Remote computing service" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3004.

http://www.azleg.gov/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp?Title=31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
BBM Can this encompass a Twitter a/c (a "communication system")?
I also looked for the rules of Twitter: - also nothing, except maybe this??
"Impersonation: You may not impersonate others through the Twitter service in a manner that does or is intended to mislead, confuse, or deceive others."
http://support.twitter.com/articles/18311-the-twitter-rules
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very far- fetched, I know, but just who is posting for missy? Can he/she be doing something illegal by posting for her ( could he/she be conceivably impersonating her)? :scared:
Just :scared: :banghead:
 
Evening Ricki :seeya:
It bothers me to no end that she is able to tweet her nonsense tweetles to the world :scared: (and that people read them!!! :stormingmad:).
I tried to search the Arizona prison/jail rules and regulations to find out if there is some kind of why to stop her on social media . This is all I found (not very enlightening, IMO):
<respectfully snipped for space>
Very far- fetched, I know, but just who is posting for missy? Can he/she be doing something illegal by posting for her ( could he/she be conceivably impersonating her)? :scared:
Just :scared: :banghead:

:stormingmad: This makes me furious. How can this be allowed?
 
No jokes...lots of talk about all the motions. Getting dizzy from too much motion. :floorlaugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
175
Guests online
490
Total visitors
665

Forum statistics

Threads
625,786
Messages
18,509,977
Members
240,846
Latest member
riversmama23
Back
Top