I hate it when parents are judged, presume guilty, and sentenced before a body was found, or trial has begun. Especially when the parents have been cleared. I need to take a break. Love you guys.
I don't know the specific case, but it all ties into the whole process we have in the US and how important juries are. It really is fascinating and impressive when you stop and think about it. By and large, juries do take that responsibility very seriously and weigh the evidence in arriving at their verdict. If there is reasonable doubt, they will return a verdict of not guilty.
I do believe that jurors can be impartial, even if they have heard news reports on the case. Just like you, they know that they have not yet heard all of the facts and so it is important to keep an open mind.
This trial is the first one that I have followed closely since the trial opened and it really has forced me to think about any biases that I might have when it comes to the presumption of innocence, sufficient evidence to bring charges and the like. It was interesting to find that there are some prosecuting attorney's offices who have the attitude "let the jury decide"...IIRC, Philadelphia has that reputation.
There are leaps to judgement in crime investigation that can cause both detectives and prosecutors to be less than objective in pulling together their case. Innocent people have been found guilty, but by and large, our jury system does work.
When it comes to the case of CMJA, I have no doubt in my mind that she is guilty. I have tried every way I know how to try and find some possible way that her self-defense claim could be true and come up empty handed every time.